Jump to content

Pixote

Admin
  • Posts

    3,143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Pixote

  • Birthday 01/12/1949

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Loves Park, Illinois

Recent Profile Visitors

1,601 profile views

Pixote's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Superstar Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I'd still go for it. We can still get a blue chip at 22 and the two 2nds (50 + 53) would awesome.
  2. Without a doubt, yes, but I doubt they'd offer both 2nd rounders. If they did, it would be an awesome opportunity to fill three needs, after the selection of CW, with quality players in the top 53 of the draft. Then we'd still have a 3rd, 4th and their 6th. Yowsa!
  3. Hell no., 10 wins minimum unless we suffer significant injuries to our blue-chip players. Last year, the Bears won 7 games. There were 2 games I still cannot figure out how we lost, which would have made it 9 wins. We've made strategic changes to our coaching staff, bolstered our defense with a legit Safety, and added depth to our offense with a RB, TE, WR, and strengthened our OL. These are significant improvements that should inspire confidence. Now it appears we will draft our franchise QB and add another blue-chip player. That isn't worth another 2 or 3 wins? Nope, there's no reason to slow my roll.
  4. Oh, Hell Yeah. Excited isn't the word to describe what I'm feeling. I haven't been this 'excited' since my wife and I left the wedding reception in '73 to return to our hotel room. ๐Ÿ˜‰ With our limited picks, Poles will wait to see cuts from other teams after the draft. Hopefully, the FAs available will match our needs to fill any holes needed until we finish the roster rebuilding process next year. If we have any less than 10 wins next year I will be disappointed. Now is the time I need to buy a new TV to better enjoy the upcoming season. OH, Yeah, my friend! We are going to rock!
  5. I read the Bleacher Report often and found this article interesting. I still suspect it will be a difficult contract negotiation. I was surprised by the last paragraph of the article (see below). Although I hope the author's viewpoint is correct, I think it is presumptive. CW, make it so!
  6. If nothing else, I'm sure he knows the scramble drill. LOL Let's hope Caleb can stay in structure and not have to resort to hero ball.
  7. Pixote

    Would you?

    Personally, I wouldn't. Maybe our #9 and our 2nd from next year - which will hopefully be around pick #64 ๐Ÿ˜‰ I love Nabers and RO as much as Harrison. All three have the potential to be future Pro Bowlers and top-five WRs.
  8. NO! LOL Statistically, yes. Anyone looking at the in-depth game stats will see an improvement in the number of sacks/hits/pressures allowed. However, stats can be misleading. Remember when, according to the 'stats,' Leno was a top-tier OLT instead of a turnstile for any speed rusher opposite him? While having CW on our side will undoubtedly make life easier for the OL, it's crucial for them to demonstrate their potential and strive to be a top-10 OL. This is the key to unlocking the full explosive potential of our offense, which we all eagerly anticipate.
  9. Pixote

    Draft Day

    I value Spielman's opinions. I was sorry he left the Bears, but he deserved his promotion. I have also always enjoyed listening to Greg Gabriel. I'm not a big Wannsted fan, but I love hearing what Charles Davis says. So we all (except for PHX?).) have our favorite professionals to read/listen to for their opinions. But, as you noted, you are not claiming they are right; you just value their opinion. The same is true here.
  10. Pixote

    Draft Day

    I just saw this proposed trade on NFL.com as one of three possible round 1 trades that would be a win/win for teams involved. This one had Chicago trading #9 to KCC. I personally do not like the deal. The first, being the last pick of rd 1, and he second rounder, again near the bottom of round 2, are not much better than a 2nd & 3rd instead of a 1st & 2nd. The extra 4th round is cool, but the 2025 #1 will probably be near the end of round 1. What do you guys think? Would you do this trade?
  11. I'm noticing some recent mock drafts showing the Bears trading down and then drafting JC Latham (Alabama ยท OT). Is he a blue-chip OT? I don't know the guy. On a side note, the last one I saw with this trade-down scenario pissed me off because they had us trading down with the Colts, who then selected Nabers at #9. If the Bears passed on Nabers I'd be pissed.
  12. Anthony Thomas was the last Bear player to be named OROY (in 2001). After 23 years, Caleb Williams wins OROY. The runner-up to CW for OROY is Rome Odunze, WR, Chicago Bears. One can only dream. ๐Ÿ˜‰
  13. Pixote

    Draft Day

    Just saw this article on NFL.com. I have always thought highly of Charles David as an analyst for NFL.com. He has had success identifying players who are not as well known as the ones getting all of the hype, but wind up being drafted and making rosters. This article identifies 16 prospects that he thinks could be drafted on day 2 or 3 of the draft. The only one I recognized was QB Rattler. There were several DTs, Edge, OGs, an OT, and a Center that he is high on. Maybe you guys are familiar with some of them. 2024 NFL Draft: Prospects Charles Davis would pound the table for
  14. Pixote

    Draft Day

    Hell, I didn't realize we already signed a Punter (maybe just another leg for training camp, but who knows?) Corliss Waitman: Corliss Waitman's 47-yard punt pins 49ers inside own 1-yard line
  15. Pixote

    Draft Day

    100% - That was vintage Mikey.
×
×
  • Create New...