Jump to content

The Bears Big Board


ASHKUM BEAR
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The Bears use the term BPA a lot but by who's list? It's their list. They're 32 different big boards, they will just tell you he was the  highest rated player on their board. Almost by everyone's list, Bjan Robinson is probably going to be the best player available at that spot. It's also position value  that will come in to play. If they took Robinson, I won't hate it but their is value later in the draft at RB, so I don't see them doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stinger226 said:

The Bears use the term BPA a lot but by who's list? It's their list. They're 32 different big boards, they will just tell you he was the  highest rated player on their board. Almost by everyone's list, Bjan Robinson is probably going to be the best player available at that spot. It's also position value  that will come in to play. If they took Robinson, I won't hate it but their is value later in the draft at RB, so I don't see them doing that.

I would say they don't want to reach too far by their grading scale/list.  Poles and Flus have traits and skills they might value differently.  If Bijan rates 9.8 and Wright 8.2, do they pass that value for a need?  I know I value need myself, but I'm just a fan that loves this process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stinger226 said:

The Bears use the term BPA a lot but by who's list? It's their list. They're 32 different big boards, they will just tell you he was the  highest rated player on their board. Almost by everyone's list, Bjan Robinson is probably going to be the best player available at that spot. It's also position value  that will come in to play. If they took Robinson, I won't hate it but their is value later in the draft at RB, so I don't see them doing that.

It bothers me that the NFL has devalued the RB position.  I could argue that a great running back can offset a lack of talent elsewhere.  If he's a great pass catcher, he's a reviving weapon.  If he's a great blocker, it makes his QB better.  If he's a great runner, he keeps his defense off the field a little longer.  Making everything about the quarterback has hurt every franchise that doesn't have one or that has overpayed for one.  It's simply a trend I disagree with and don't care for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RBs and Strong Safeties are 5' 11" and 220 pounds. If you assume that athletic ability is equally randomly distributed to all size of people, and you know that there are many more people who are 5' 11" and 220 than 6' 6" and 320 pounds, then you see that there are many more potential RBs in the world than OTs.

Also, a RBs success depends so much on the OL. A lesser RB has more yards behind a good OL than a good RB does behind a poor one.

And finally, RBs take so many hits, they dont usually play so long. Most arent homerun hitters.

RBs are important, but you can see why the NFL devalues the position.

That said, every now and again a player comes along at any position who can take over a game. Ed Reed, Gronk, even Deion Sanders can take over a game from a position that isnt usually where that influence comes from.

Having Jim Brown, Walter Payton or Barry Sanders is always going to be a winning move, but shy of a superstar like that, while it is extremely important to have a good RB, you can see why the NFL would rather have another younger one cheaper than pay that position in salary and draft capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...