Jump to content

2017 Draft and QB Analysis and Grading


Lucky Luciano
 Share

Recommended Posts

my thoughts are this... we decided as a franchise this was the time to go for that franchise qb. we had the draft slot this year to do so. waiting for another year guarantees nothing. we could pick in the middle of the draft.

 

the qb class next year is uncertain. even if there is a can't miss qb 'ready to start' how in the world would we be able to move up to get him? in all likelyhood he would go #1 without a trade option. that leaves us looking at a qb of much lower ratings and having to trade up to get him anyway. by picking trubinsky we got the best qb prospect in the draft this year with real potential to be a star in chicago.

 

we also have the luxery of not having to start him this year which is also a plus as to why trubisky was so valuable to us this year. we can groom him to be ready to play in the NFL. it's smart forward thinking.

 

i think we did very well this year and took the gambles we NEEDED to take at the RIGHT time.

 

onward...

 

i've put together a lot of information on this years draft in regards to qb's. to me the entire process of 'most' of these analysts post draft grades has no basis in this dimensions reality. it's a contradiction to common sense and their own predraft analysis.

 

it reeks of media prejudice against chicago which has gone on for decades. most sporting 'news' sources are based out of new york or certainly an east coast (new york, washington, new england or philidelphia especially) influence and chicago is a second class franchises who constantly gets bad or no press.

 

in my opinion we should have been rated for this draft a C+ to B-. if trubisky hits it's an A+ draft.

 

i've tried to show the differences in predraft ratings and post draft grades. below are what was given to move up for the top 3 qb's in this years draft...

 

chicago - up one slot from #3 to #2 - picked trubisky

swapped firsts, gave up their 3rd round pick 67 and their fourth round pick 111 plus a 2018 third-rounder

 

kansas city - moved up 17 slots from #27 to #10 - picked mahomes

swapped firsts, gave up a third round pick #91 and a 2018 FIRST ROUND PICK

they gave up a lot more, in my opinion, than chicago to pick the third or fourth ranked QB in this draft with a TOP 10 pick and get a much higher post draft grade for doing so? BullShite

 

houston texans - move up from #25 to #12 - picked watson

swapped firsts PLUS a 2018 first round pick to get the first/second ranked QB in this draft. next years FIRST ROUND pick is a lot to give up yet they get an A in some of the post draft grades and the bears get a D or F?

 

2017 NFL Draft - the Quarterbacks

 

Predraft Analysis:

 

Beacher Report

1. Mitch Trubisky

2. Deshaun Watson

3. DeShone Kizer

4. Patrick Mahomes II

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2693145...backs-available

 

POST DRAFT GRADES:

Bears - D

they gave the trubisky pick a D

Chiefs - B

they gave the mahomes pick a B

Texans - A-

they gave the watson pick a B

all of these grades are complete BS and reek of unjustified prejudice or complete stupidity. the analyst should stick to his strengths as a writer... bird watching and how it effects my inner being.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2706361...-2017-nfl-draft

 

Fox Sports

1. Deshaun Watson Clemson

2 . Mitchell Trubisky North Carolina

3 . DeShone Kizer Notre Dame

4 . Patrick Mahomes Texas Tech

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-d...-12-2017-042117

 

POST DRAFT GRADES:

Bears - C

Chiefs - B

Texans - B

in my opinion these are 'reasonable' grades although a bit high on the chiefs and texans.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-d...-team-do-042917

 

SBNATION

1 Deshaun Watson Clemson

2 Mitchell Trubisky North Carolina

3 DeShone Kizer Notre Dame

4 Patrick Mahomes Texas Tech

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl-mock-draft/201...patrick-mahomes

 

POST DRAFT GRADES:

Bears - C

Chiefs - C

Texans - C+

in my opinion these are fair grades

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl-mock-draft/201...-losers-results

 

Sports Illustrated

1 Deshaun Watson Clemson 6' 2", 221 lbs.

2 Patrick Mahomes Texas Tech 6' 2", 225 lbs.

3 DeShone Kizer Notre Dame 6' 4", 233 lbs.

4 Mitchell Trubisky North Carolina 6' 2", 222 lbs.

Trubisky is such a mixed bag: He might be the first QB off the board, and he also might need the most seasoning before he’s ready to start.

https://www.si.com/2017-nfl-draft-quarterback-rankings

 

POST DRAFT FIRST ROUND GRADES:

Bears - D

Chiefs - B+

Texans - A-

in my opinion Sports Illustrated may want to stick with the swim suit issue as the top spot in their sporting analysis. it's obvious this guy had his eye on something besides football before and after the draft. dumb or dumber sports writers? you make the call.

 

WalterFootball.com

1. Mitch Trubisky*, QB, North Carolina

Height: 6-2. Weight: 222. Hand: 9.5.

40 Time: 4.67.

Projected Round (2017): Top-25 Pick.

 

2. Deshaun Watson*, QB, Clemson

Height: 6-2. Weight: 221. Hand: 9.75.

40 Time: 4.66.

Projected Round (2017): 1.

 

3. Pat Mahomes*, QB, Texas Tech

Height: 6-2. Weight: 225. Hand: 9.25.

40 Time: 4.80.

Projected Round (2017): 1.

http://walterfootball.com/draft2017QB.php

 

POST DRAFT GRADES:

Bears - F

Chiefs - C+

Texans - C-

WOW? in my opinion it's OBVIOUS this pundit has severe brain damage and if not he should stick to grading bowling-for-dollars as his chosen field of sports analysis.

http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftgrades.php

 

CBS Predraft analysis:

12 *Mitch Trubisky QB 1 North Carolina rJr 6-2 222 1

15 *Deshaun Watson QB 2 Clemson Jr 6-2 221 1

34 *DeShone Kizer QB 3 Notre Dame rSo 6-4 233 1-2

35 *Patrick Mahomes II QB 4 Texas Tech Jr 6-2 225 1-2

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2017/QB

 

POST DRAFT GRADES ROUND 1:

Bears - D

Chiefs - B+

Texans - C

all over the board here. again either stupid or out of touch with the reality of their own grading system.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2017-nfl...-round-1-picks/

 

 

================================================================================

 

Sports Illustrated 2017 DRAFT GRADES

 

Round 1, Pick 2 (No. 2 overall, from 49ers)

 

BEARS: Mitchell Trubisky, QB, UNC: Pick 2 and the first massive surprise of the night. The Bears sent picks 3, 67, 111 and a 2018 third-rounder to the 49ers to move up one spot for Trubisky. That’s a pretty strong indication that a.) the Bears believe Trubisky is destined to be a star, and b.) multiple teams were lining up for Trubisky (or San Francisco at least made Chicago believe that). It is a massive commitment that comes right after the Bears signed Mike Glennon in free agency. Is Trubisky here to take the job in 2017 or to sit and watch? Given the price, it almost has to be the former. This is a huge gamble by the Bears on a quarterback who drew mixed reviews throughout the draft process.​ GRADE: D

 

Round 2, Pick 13 (No. 45) (From Arizona)

 

Adam Shaheen, TE, Ashland: Just like that, we have a tight end run on our hands. The Bears needed depth at the position—Zach Miller’s been banged up a lot, Dion Sims has never had 300 yards receiving in a season and the rest of the depth chart is thin. Shaheen’s solid pass catching, suspect blocking combo actually will fit well with those other options. But there were a lot of other directions Chicago could have gone here. Grade: C

 

Round 4, Pick 5 (No. 112) (From Buffalo) Eddie Jackson, S, Alabama

 

Round 4, Pick 13 (No. 119) (From Arizona) Tarik Cohen, RB, North Carolina A&T

 

Round 5, Pick 3 (No. 147): Jordan Morgan, G, Kutztown University

 

===================================================================

 

Round 1, Pick 10 (No. 10 overall, via trade with the Bills):

 

CHIEFS: Pat Mahomes, QB, Texas Tech: How ‘bout that? As rumor had it all day long, the Chiefs swung for the fences, moving up a whopping 17 spots in Round 1 at the cost of picks 27, 91 and a 2018 first-rounder. But with Cleveland and Arizona lurking at picks 12 and 13, respectively, Kansas City had little choice if it wanted to guarantee itself Mahomes. The gunslinger from Texas Tech lands in a perfect situation, with a QB-friendly coach in Andy Reid, a veteran in Alex Smith to hold down the fort and an opportunity to take over the starting job soon. The rub: The Chiefs paid a huge price for a developmental quarterback, choosing Mahomes over Deshaun Watson. This is the type of move that can make or break a front office. GRADE: B+

 

======================================================================

 

Round 1, Pick 12 (No. 12 overall, via trade with Cleveland Browns):

 

TEXANS: Deshaun Watson, QB, Clemson: Three quarterbacks in the top 12, three pricey trades up for the teams that took them. For the Texans to get from No. 25 to here, the cost was that 25th pick plus a 2018 first-rounder. Remember, the Browns already own Houston’s 2018 second-rounder, as part of the Brock Osweiler salary dump. But the Texans could not carry a playoff-ready roster into next season with Tom Savage and Brandon Weeden manning the QB depth chart. Watson threw too many interceptions in college and he’ll need time to transition into Bill O’Brien’s offense, but he is the most talented quarterback there by a wide margin. This has to work, because the Texans mortgaged their ‘18 draft to solve a mess of their own creation.​ GRADE: A-

 

=========================================================================

 

this is a list of teams quarterback needs prior to the 2017 draft

 

ESPN - Teams expected to draft a quarterback

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/page/32for...s-draft-qb-2017

 

Arizona Cardinals

 

With everything coach Bruce Arians and general manager Steve Keim have said over the past few months, the Cardinals will do everything in their power to take a quarterback if the right choice is there. This much we know: Whomever the Cardinals draft won't start in 2017 and will spend the season sitting behind starter Carson Palmer and backup Drew Stanton while he learns the playbook inside and out. If the right quarterback is available at No. 13, it's not out of the realm of possibility for the Cardinals to draft one in the first round. If not, picking a quarterback on the second day would be likely. -- Josh Weinfuss

Baltimore Ravens

 

Drafting a quarterback is far down the list of priorities right now, but it could happen. This would be a good time to get one in the middle or late rounds and develop him as a long-term backup, because Ryan Mallett is signed only through next season. Baltimore has drafted only one quarterback in the past five drafts, and Keith Wenning lasted one year on the practice squad. The Ravens don't have to worry about finding a starter; Joe Flacco is under contract through 2021. -- Jamison Hensley

Buffalo Bills

 

If Tyrod Taylor had not accepted a $10 million pay cut and the Bills had released him last month, then I think quarterback would have been their go-to position at No. 10 in the first round. But now that Taylor is in the fold for at least another year, I foresee a quarterback going to Buffalo on Day 2 or possibly Day 3. For now, 2016 fourth-round pick Cardale Jones projects as their No. 2 quarterback, but he is an unknown, and the Bills have room for another developmental option on their depth chart. It would be good business for the Bills to keep taking swings at finding their franchise quarterback. -- Mike Rodak

Carolina Panthers

 

Editor's Picks

 

Biggest remaining hole for every NFL team

 

The Seahawks still need depth at cornerback behind Richard Sherman. And -- surprise! -- the Browns and Texans could use quarterbacks. NFL Nation picks the position of need for each team in 2017.

Kiper and McShay's dueling two-round mock drafts

 

Sixty-four picks, two draft experts and not a whole lot of agreement about who will go where. Mel and Todd predict the first two rounds of the 2017 NFL draft.

Browns' dilemma with No. 1 pick: Pass-rusher, QB or ... neither?

 

Myles Garrett? Deshaun Watson? Jimmy Garoppolo? The Browns have plenty of viable ways to spend the top pick in the 2017 draft. Bill Barnwell examines whether one makes more sense than the others.

 

I say the Panthers will draft a quarterback only because "maybe" wasn't an option. Carolina hasn't selected a quarterback since making Cam Newton the top pick of the 2011 draft. Backups Derek Anderson and Joe Webb are in the final year of their contracts, and both are in the 30-plus age group. With eight picks and Newton recovering from surgery on his torn rotator cuff, it's time for Carolina to at least toy with the idea of taking a quarterback who could replace the 2015 NFL MVP should he get hurt again. -- David Newton

Chicago Bears

 

The Bears drafted only three quarterbacks (Dan LeFevour, Nate Enderle and David Fales) in the Jay Cutler era. That oversight (or neglect) forced Chicago to sign veteran Mike Glennon instead of turning Cutler's old job over to a homegrown talent. The Bears are high on Glennon, but drafting a quarterback is still a priority. The Bears probably don't take a quarterback at No. 3 overall, but it's easy to envision them grabbing one somewhere between Rounds 2 and 4. -- Jeff Dickerson

Cleveland Browns

 

The Browns absolutely will draft a quarterback. It won't be with their first pick, but the Browns will take a quarterback either 12th or 33rd -- and if they don't, it will be a shock. Whether it's Mitch Trubisky or Deshaun Watson at No. 12 or Patrick Mahomes II or Davis Webb at No. 33, the Browns must leave this draft with a quarterback to add something to a position of great need. -- Pat McManamon

Dallas Cowboys

 

The Cowboys opted not to address the backup to Dak Prescott with a high-priced veteran in free agency and instead signed Kellen Moore to a one-year deal after he missed last season with a broken ankle. Had they added a Josh McCown type along with Moore, then I would have answered no to this question. Without the veteran, the Cowboys need another arm. They went from the fourth round in 2009 (Stephen McGee) to the fourth round last year (Prescott) without selecting a quarterback in the draft. While they have said they need to look to the defense in the draft, they will take a quarterback in the middle to late rounds as a potential backup of the future. -- Todd Archer

Denver Broncos

 

You're talking about a general manager in John Elway who used two draft picks on quarterbacks during the four seasons he had both Peyton Manning and Brock Osweiler on the roster. One of those quarterbacks -- Trevor Siemian -- was the team's starter in 2016 and will be difficult to unseat as the starter this time around. Elway and coach Vance Joseph have said Siemian and Paxton Lynch will battle it out in training camp for the starting job, but with 10 draft picks it's a good bet the Broncos will use a second- or third-day pick on a quarterback. Elway likes to have a developmental prospect somewhere, either on the roster or on the practice squad. -- Jeff Legwold

Detroit Lions

 

The Lions have two quarterbacks on the roster, and general manager Bob Quinn has said he would like to draft a quarterback every year or two for development as backups to starter Matthew Stafford. With Stafford and Jake Rudock, there isn't a true need at the position, but the Lions could take a quarterback with a third-day pick. It's not a lock the Lions will draft a quarterback, but Detroit will surely add a third (if not a fourth) arm for spring workouts and training camp. Also, a seventh-round quarterback could be an option here if the player is right. -- Michael Rothstein

Houston Texans

 

Even if the Texans had been able to acquire Tony Romo, they would still be looking at quarterbacks in the draft -- maybe even in the first round. There are still a lot of questions marks at the position for Houston, but the Texans do need to draft and develop a signal-caller to hopefully stop this quarterback carousel they have been dealing with since the franchise's beginning. Houston has drafted only three quarterbacks since 2005 (Alex Brink, T.J. Yates and Tom Savage), and none of them have started more than seven games for the Texans. -- Sarah Barshop

Jacksonville Jaguars

 

The Jaguars don't know if Blake Bortles is the long-term answer after a disastrous 2016 season, so they have to have a backup plan in place other than Chad Henne and Brandon Allen. It's not likely the Jaguars will take a quarterback in the first several rounds, unless they really like one who slips and is surprisingly available, so expect a mid-round pick to be used on one. -- Mike DiRocco

Kansas City Chiefs

 

This is an excellent year for the Chiefs to draft a quarterback, perhaps in the first round for the first time since 1983. Alex Smith has two seasons left on his contract, giving the Chiefs plenty of time to groom a quarterback to step into the starting lineup by 2019. The Chiefs have two backups on their roster, but neither Tyler Bray nor Joel Stave entered the NFL as a draft pick. The Chiefs have 10 draft picks this year, so they have the resources to move up a few spots in the first round to take a quarterback such as Texas Tech's Patrick Mahomes, if they so desire. -- Adam Teicher

Los Angeles Chargers

 

The Chargers have drafted a quarterback just once under the direction of general manager Tom Telesco -- Brad Sorensen in the seventh round of the 2013 draft. However, both Telesco and coach Anthony Lynn have said they want to bring in a young quarterback to learn behind franchise signal-caller Philip Rivers. The Chargers had private workouts with Patrick Mahomes and DeShone Kizer. And offensive coordinator Ken Whisenhunt attended Nathan Peterman's pro day at Pitt, so the team is doing its homework. -- Eric D. Williams

New Orleans Saints

 

It's not a must, since Drew Brees is still thriving at age 38. But it's definitely a strong possibility -- maybe 50-50 at this point -- since the Saints have five picks in the first three rounds. Even if they trade one of those picks for Patriots cornerback Malcolm Butler, they'll be filling one of their biggest needs before the draft, freeing up their options. It would be a surprise if the Saints draft a quarterback as high as No. 11, since they are still in win-now mode and have glaring needs on defense. But someone such as Patrick Mahomes at No. 32 or No. 42 or Joshua Dobbs in Round 3 is an intriguing possibility. -- Mike Triplett

New York Giants

 

Eli Manning is 36 years old, and the Giants haven't been coy about their interest in finding his eventual replacement. They would be foolish not to at least be doing their due diligence. But picking 23rd and with a weak quarterback class, it's unlikely they find an answer in the first two rounds, unless either Mitchell Trubisky or Deshaun Watson suffers an unlikely tumble. The most likely scenario is the Giants grab a quarterback in the middle rounds, someone such as Pittsburgh's Nathan Peterman, Virginia Tech's Jarrod Evans or Tennessee's Josh Dobbs. -- Jordan Raanan

New York Jets

 

If they don't do it with the No. overall 6 pick, the Jets almost certainly will draft a quarterback at some point. They've conducted private workouts with the top four prospects -- Mitchell Trubisky, Deshaun Watson, Patrick Mahomes and DeShone Kizer. They like Trubisky, but is he worth a high pick? The Jets have selected a quarterback in each of the past four drafts, but they're still searching for that elusive franchise player. -- Rich Cimini

Philadelphia Eagles

 

The Eagles feel very confident they have landed their franchise quarterback in Carson Wentz. However, owner Jeffrey Lurie believes in regularly investing in the quarterback position regardless of who the starter is and might do so later this month if the stars align. Given the team's other pressing needs, a Day 3 selection makes the most sense. -- Tim McManus

Pittsburgh Steelers

 

The longer the pre-draft process moves along, the stronger the indications become that the Steelers could grab a Day 2 quarterback and groom him for the next one to two years behind Ben Roethlisberger. The situation would have to be ideal, though. They will target a few preferable signal-callers and won't reach for one. If the draft board falls right, they'll pounce. But the defensive rebuild isn't yet done, and this offense could use one more playmaker, too, so the situation is hardly "quarterback or bust." Stocked with eight picks, the Steelers will likely walk away with one passer out of that bunch. -- Jeremy Fowler

 

San Francisco 49ers

 

It's not out of the realm of possibility the Niners could take one in the first round, but they've so far proved willing to be patient to find their franchise quarterback, and that probably won't change now. The more likely scenario is they'll ride with Brian Hoyer as the starter this season, draft a quarterback on Day 2 or early Day 3 they can develop and then reassess where they stand after the 2017 season. -- Nick Wagoner

Teams that are likely set at quarterback

Atlanta Falcons

 

The Falcons have reigning MVP Matt Ryan, who has started every game for the past seven seasons. And they re-signed veteran backup Matt Schaub to a two-year, $8 million contract ($6.25 million guaranteed). The Falcons are fine with going with just two quarterbacks on the active roster and are likely to add another to the practice squad. There's no need to use a draft pick on a practice-squad player. -- Vaughn McClure

Cincinnati Bengals

 

The Bengals are set with Andy Dalton as a starter and have a very capable backup in AJ McCarron. They have no reason to draft a new quarterback after carrying three on the active roster last season. This changes only if McCarron is traded before the draft. Judging by the high price the Bengals appear to be asking for him, it's a toss-up as to whether that will happen. -- Katherine Terrell

Green Bay Packers

 

First off, there are too many other holes on the roster, especially on defense. And it's too early to draft Aaron Rodgers' successor, especially after coach Mike McCarthy said last week that he believes Rodgers could play into his 40s, and they are set with Brett Hundley as the backup for another year. The Packers also like what No. 3 quarterback Joe Callahan showed last summer and want to see how he develops. -- Rob Demovsky

Indianapolis Colts

 

The Colts have franchise quarterback Andrew Luck with Scott Tolzien as his backup and young, talented Stephen Morris as the team's third quarterback. The Colts are in the position of not needing to draft a quarterback anytime soon. -- Mike Wells

Los Angeles Rams

 

Not a chance. The Rams need a break from this position, for obvious reasons. They moved up 14 spots and ultimately gave up this year's No. 5 overall pick for the right to select Jared Goff first overall in 2016. Goff enters 2017 as the starter. His backup will be Sean Mannion, a third-round pick from 2015 who has yet to receive much playing time. They need to see what they have in their young quarterbacks under new coach Sean McVay. Their hope is that they won't have to address this position in the draft for years to come. -- Alden Gonzalez

Miami Dolphins

2017 NFL DRAFT

 

NFL DraftRound 1: Thursday, 8 p.m., ESPN/ESPN App

Rds. 2-3: Friday, 7 p.m., ESPN/ESPN App

Rds. 4-7: Saturday, noon, ESPN/ESPN App

Where: Philadelphia

 

NFL draft home page »

 

• 2017 NFL draft order »

• Mel Kiper's final Mock Draft »

• Todd McShay's final Mock Draft »

• McShay's ultimate draft preview »

• McShay's final prospect rankings »

• Kiper's final Big Board: Top 300 »

• Kiper v. McShay: Head-to-head Mock »

• McShay's biggest needs for all 32 »

• McShay's 2017 All-Satellite Team »

 

The Dolphins have one of the league's most stable quarterback pairings in starter Ryan Tannehill and veteran backup Matt Moore. Neither quarterback is elite, but both are solid in their respective roles, and that showed last season when the pair combined to go 10-6 to get Miami into the playoffs. Drafting a quarterback this year would be a wasted pick because that player, at best, would be the No. 3 option. -- James Walker

Minnesota Vikings

 

The Vikings signed Case Keenum to be Sam Bradford's backup last week, and they've still got third-year undrafted free agent Taylor Heinicke on the roster. And then there's Teddy Bridgewater, who is trying to return from a catastrophic knee injury to continue his career in Minnesota. There's an argument to be made for another developmental quarterback, but the Vikings might be able to get one as a rookie free agent. They have eight draft picks, but they also have enough other needs that they'll likely fill those before looking at a quarterback. -- Ben Goessling

New England Patriots

 

The Patriots have Tom Brady (contract through 2019), Jimmy Garoppolo (2017) and Jacoby Brissett (2019) on the depth chart, and they won't draft a quarterback who wouldn't project to be on the active roster. The team usually carries only two quarterbacks but will be happy to carry three in 2017 given Garoppolo's promise and value as a high-end insurance policy. The outside chance exists they use a seventh-round pick on a signal-caller with the practice squad in mind, but even that seems like a long shot. -- Mike Reiss

Oakland Raiders

 

The Raiders already have an MVP-level franchise quarterback in Derek Carr, who is expected to make a full comeback from the broken right fibula he sustained in Week 16. Plus, they have Connor Cook, who was drafted in the fourth round last season after Oakland traded up to grab him. And the Raiders signed a first-round pick in EJ Manuel last month after he played four seasons in Buffalo. The Raiders, for the first time since the salad days of Rich Gannon, are set at quarterback. -- Paul Gutierrez

Seattle Seahawks

 

In seven drafts under coach Pete Carroll and general manager John Schneider, the Seahawks have drafted one quarterback: Russell Wilson. Wilson is only 28 and is signed through the 2019 season. The focus of Seattle's draft will be on surrounding him with talent to extend the Seahawks' window for a title. The organization could explore backup options more seriously after Wilson suffered three different injuries in 2016. If the season started today, Trevone Boykin, an undrafted free agent last year, would be the backup. The Seahawks are expected to add another option to compete with Boykin, but using a draft pick for that purpose seems unlikely. -- Sheil Kapadia

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

 

Despite losing backup Mike Glennon, coach Dirk Koetter said at the recent owners meetings that he believes Ryan Griffin and Sean Renfree are viable replacements for Glennon at the No. 2 spot and said it'll be a "nice competition." In fact, Koetter had been eyeing both players for that spot when the team drafted Jameis Winston two years ago. "The two quarterbacks that we always had our eye on that were, at that time No. 3s in the league, were those two guys, and now we have them both," Koetter said. "In both of those guys' case, they haven't had their chance; they haven't had their opportunity yet to prove that when the money's on the line, they can do it." With that being said, general manager Jason Licht believes in leaving "no stone unturned," and the door is always open if there's an upgrade out there who can grasp their system. -- Jenna Laine

Tennessee Titans

 

The Titans are set for the long term with Marcus Mariota as their starter. Matt Cassel will run the offense while Mariota completes his rehabilitation from a surgically repaired broken leg this offseason. Tennessee also likes its third quarterback in Alex Tanney. -- Paul Kuharsky

Washington Redskins

 

I've gone back and forth on this one because the Kirk Cousins long-term situation remains cloudy at best. So at some point they must address the fact he might not be here beyond 2018 and that they need a viable long-term replacement. The Redskins have told Cousins they won't trade him, so clearly he'll be around this coming season. That's why I say "no" here: They don't have an immediate need to find one in the first three rounds. Beyond that? They should draft one. Colt McCoy would be their bridge quarterback, and, as of now, Nate Sudfeld, a sixth-round pick in 2016, is the No. 3. Former general manager Scot McCloughan believed Sudfeld could develop into a starter; that belief is not shared by all. If the Redskins do draft a quarterback in the higher rounds, any chance of a long-term deal with Cousins evaporates. My guess is they'll wait until 2018 to draft one in the early rounds. -- John Keim

================================================================================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...