February 28, 201610 yr comment_155189 Looks sloppy, slow, Unimpressive. He looks more suited inside as a 4-3 3T than what the Bears need. Report
February 29, 201610 yr comment_155215 Yeah, I was underwhelmed. The film still looks good and I wouldn't hate the pick if he falls to the 3rd though. Report
February 29, 201610 yr Author comment_155218 Yeah, I was underwhelmed. The film still looks good and I wouldn't hate the pick if he falls to the 3rd though. It IS kind of funny how guys rise/fall in the combine, changing how everyone thinks of them and slots them. I'd be happy with a 3rd, but not a 2nd on this guy. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.