Bears4Ever_34 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Bears needs are WR,DT,CB,OLB,OL. We didn't get Baldwin, I say Greg Little would be a nice consolation prize. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I say they look hard at WR and DT, and end up with Stephen Paea. Leonard Hankerson wouldn't be a bad choice. I doubt Marvin Austin will be available at 62. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawhizz Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Bears needs are WR,DT,CB,OLB,OL. We didn't get Baldwin, I say Greg Little would be a nice consolation prize. If they were really looking to get Baldwin, then I think Little's a good call. I'd love Hankerson, but I think he'll be gone. If they aren't targeting a WR, I have to think it's a good fit at DT like Drake Nevis, Jurrell Casey, or Christian Ballard (who might fall in their lap after his drug test). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Bears needs are WR,DT,CB,OLB,OL. We didn't get Baldwin, I say Greg Little would be a nice consolation prize. Our DT's are putrid and there ain't much availble. Round #2 seems ideal. Possible options: Steven Paea, Marvin Austin, Jurrell Casey, Christian Ballard, Terrell McClain, Jarvis Jenkins, or Drake Nevis. I'll be shocked if one of those guys don't go to the Bears in Round #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 arent the coaches all about McClain this offseason? I still think we need a real WR...but FreeAgents are there for WR....DTs arent at all. unless another OL is avail we need a DT who can start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I say they look hard at WR and DT, and end up with Stephen Paea. Leonard Hankerson wouldn't be a bad choice. I doubt Marvin Austin will be available at 62. Pea or Austin (I really want Austin cause I buy into Marinelli working with him) would look awful nice. And I wouldn't be completely stunned if Bowers was still around when we pick. His injury sounds really bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I think Austin might fall to the 3rd round. Hankerson or Little, especially Little would make my day if the Bears could nab him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I think Austin might fall to the 3rd round. Hankerson or Little, especially Little would make my day if the Bears could nab him. Austin is not going to fall all the way to our 3rd round pick. No way, no how. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Austin is not going to fall all the way to our 3rd round pick. No way, no how. I agree because if he's there when the Bears pick he's ours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 The Bears rarely draft how fans mock them. I'm thinking they take Ras-I Dowling (because Austin will be gone), and then Terrell McClain in round 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.