Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 The more and more I think of it, the more I wouldn't mind if we took Rashard Mendenhall, RB out of Illinois. He is an absolute monster- a muscular, faster, better attituded Cedric Benson. However, I'd only do this if we could trade Benson to a team for a 2nd rounder, so that way, we could go Flacco in the 2nd, then somebody like Carl Nicks, then Roy Schuening. What are your thoughts on taking Mendy if we could get a 2nd, or 3rd, for Benson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Doesn't the cap hit murder the team if they try to trade Benson? And, IMO, I don't care which RB they put back there. If they don't fix the O-Line first, then it'd take Barry Sanders before this team had a good looking RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iguana Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 no way any team is stupid enough to give up a 2nd or 3rd for Benson. Hell, Randy Moss netted a 4th, IIRC and Benson isnt even in his league in terms of production or pure physical talent. Plus, I really doubt JA would even think about cutting Benson loose...not to mention the cap hit. Not going to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 The more and more I think of it, the more I wouldn't mind if we took Rashard Mendenhall, RB out of Illinois. He is an absolute monster- a muscular, faster, better attituded Cedric Benson. However, I'd only do this if we could trade Benson to a team for a 2nd rounder, so that way, we could go Flacco in the 2nd, then somebody like Carl Nicks, then Roy Schuening. What are your thoughts on taking Mendy if we could get a 2nd, or 3rd, for Benson? We'd be lucky to get a bag of used jocks for Benson at this point. Plus the cap hit is fairly significant if I can remember. He is with us for 1 more yr. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted February 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Well OK then let's rephrase. JA said that OL should be picked in rounds 2-7. How unhappy would you be if we went Mendenhall at 14, then Flacco with our 2nd rounder? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Well OK then let's rephrase. JA said that OL should be picked in rounds 2-7. How unhappy would you be if we went Mendenhall at 14, then Flacco with our 2nd rounder? Mendenhall, Brohm, or Phillips would be the only players I would consider at #14 if I was not selecting OL. So I would not mind that pick. It gives Benson some real competition, and gives us a legit back for the next 5 years. The only issue I see with that scenario would be not drafting an OL until the 3rd. I guess FA will determine some of these possibilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted February 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Mendenhall, Brohm, or Phillips would be the only players I would consider at #14 if I was not selecting OL. So I would not mind that pick. It gives Benson some real competition, and gives us a legit back for the next 5 years. The only issue I see with that scenario would be not drafting an OL until the 3rd. I guess FA will determine some of these possibilities. But if we sign a guy like Bell or Faneca for G, and then a guy who might be cheap, like Stacy Andrews for T, then I wouldn't feel so guilty not selecting an OL until round 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 But if we sign a guy like Bell or Faneca for G, and then a guy who might be cheap, like Stacy Andrews for T, then I wouldn't feel so guilty not selecting an OL until round 3. Absolutely. If we do that, go for it. Mendenhall is a stud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 I've like Mendenahall for a while. I personally would rather have him over about any player on offense for the 1st round depending on how it shakes out. The more and more I think of it, the more I wouldn't mind if we took Rashard Mendenhall, RB out of Illinois. He is an absolute monster- a muscular, faster, better attituded Cedric Benson. However, I'd only do this if we could trade Benson to a team for a 2nd rounder, so that way, we could go Flacco in the 2nd, then somebody like Carl Nicks, then Roy Schuening. What are your thoughts on taking Mendy if we could get a 2nd, or 3rd, for Benson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenom283 Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 But if we sign a guy like Bell or Faneca for G, and then a guy who might be cheap, like Stacy Andrews for T, then I wouldn't feel so guilty not selecting an OL until round 3. Well you can cut Andrews out of that he just got franchised. Who's left, Starks but he has too many knocks on him but a change of scenery might help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 The more and more I think of it, the more I wouldn't mind if we took Rashard Mendenhall, RB out of Illinois. He is an absolute monster- a muscular, faster, better attituded Cedric Benson. However, I'd only do this if we could trade Benson to a team for a 2nd rounder, so that way, we could go Flacco in the 2nd, then somebody like Carl Nicks, then Roy Schuening. What are your thoughts on taking Mendy if we could get a 2nd, or 3rd, for Benson? The problem I see is that in 2005 we took Benson in the first round, and in 2007 we took Wolfe in the 3rd round. Any player you draft in rounds 1 through 4 you expect them to be able to start. We've done that twice at the same position and have crap to show for it. I don't think JA can justify doing that 3 times in 4 years. Our best option is free agency. Justin Fargas resigned with Oakland for 3 years, 12 million, with 6 million guaranteed. I'm guessing we'd be able to sign Julius Jones or Derrick Ward for something in that price range. (Ward looked like a hall-of-famer against the Bears, but it scares me that every running-back the Giants played all season looked monstrous.) Michael Turner has a better "up-side" but would cost more and has proven less. Either way, Cedric has ZERO value. If the cap number was minimum, a team might throw us a 6th or 7th rounder for him, just to take a chance. That's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 I think if we drafted Rashard which I definitely would do, we could use him and Benson as a combo atleast for a year. I think it would work out, Benson would be the starter and Rashard be the change of pace back or vise versa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chwtom Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 There is a cap hit for trading/releasing Benson but iirc it is under $2 Mil, so relatively manageable. Maybe the Bears can trade Benson to the Broncos for Javon Walker. Not sure who has more trade value, but I know the Broncos like Benson and if anyone could harness Benson's talent, it's them. That would make Mendenhall (or Jonathan Stewart, who might have more pass-catching ability) more of a possible target. I think Javon Walker has a roster bonus due pretty soon, so I would imagine Denver will want to do something with him relatively soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 There is a cap hit for trading/releasing Benson but iirc it is under $2 Mil, so relatively manageable. Maybe the Bears can trade Benson to the Broncos for Javon Walker. Not sure who has more trade value, but I know the Broncos like Benson and if anyone could harness Benson's talent, it's them. That would make Mendenhall (or Jonathan Stewart, who might have more pass-catching ability) more of a possible target. I think Javon Walker has a roster bonus due pretty soon, so I would imagine Denver will want to do something with him relatively soon. Why would the Broncos want Benson when they can basically turn any runner into a 1,000 yard back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chwtom Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Why would the Broncos want Benson when they can basically turn any runner into a 1,000 yard back? They are likely to lose Travis Henry, and have expressed interest in Benson. They also might have to get rid of Walker, so they might as well turn a malcontent into someone who they can turn into a franchise back. He wouldn't come with any signing bonus, so he'd be fairly cheap for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 I could see Benson in a Broncos uniform. Will it happen? Probably not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 If we pick up Faneca then id def go for Mendy or Stewart in the first round. Bensons a free agent after this year anyway right? I think we have plenty of room financially to have benson stick around for a year till his contract is up. I'd personally take Stewart over Mendy. They are both outrageously huge guys and I seen a piece on Stewart and he seems to have a tremendous work ethic. Both these kids are gonna be studs in this league and IMO gonna be x times better then benson. If Stewart is there and the bears have signed Faneca then they need to seriously take a long hard look at him and snatch him up. Stewart + faneca= playoffs imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.