Guest TerraTor Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/footbal...from=blog_last3 Oh well, cant be worse than benson. A broken foot alexander is more dangerous than a healthy benson, which there hasnt ever been anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 If Alexander got healthy he could still have another year or two left (obviously he can't be given the ball 30plus times like he did in his prime, but still there could be value there. The problem is he's the type of back that needs good blocking to succeed and Chicago really doesn't have that. I'd rather have Alexander as a backup plan/guy to push Benson than Peterson (who I know isn't a legit starter). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 If you are a RB who needs good blocking to succeed then you are a RB with lots of company, and little value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Pass. I have a friend who is a diehard Seattle fan, and he's hated Alexander for several years. Alexander runs weak, seeks the sideline whenever possible, breaks no tackles, and would get destroyed behind the Bears' OL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.