February 24, 201115 yr comment_89277 Agreed. But I hope that's a good sign that everyone agrees, for the most part, on what the Bears need: OL, DL, S, WR. Expect it to get louder around the draft, and a hell of a lot louder if the Bears' management doesn't follow the agreed upon needs. Report
February 24, 201115 yr comment_89278 Agreed. But I hope that's a good sign that everyone agrees, for the most part, on what the Bears need: OL, DL, S, WR. Expect it to get louder around the draft, and a hell of a lot louder if the Bears' management doesn't follow the agreed upon needs. Ah, the nature of the board. Team makes questionable move and the board goes nuts. Team makes good moves and board is kinda quiet Report
February 24, 201115 yr comment_89279 So true. I really think this is the first time in a long while a vast majority of us agree on the needs. And a serious overwhelming majority agree on the 1st priority, OL. From there, we have some differing opinions on ranking DL, S and WR. If only the brain trust would consult us... I'll pine for that as I hope I win the Lotto... Agreed. But I hope that's a good sign that everyone agrees, for the most part, on what the Bears need: OL, DL, S, WR. Expect it to get louder around the draft, and a hell of a lot louder if the Bears' management doesn't follow the agreed upon needs. Report
February 24, 201115 yr comment_89280 Kinsd of a sad state that over the past few years, we've been going more nuts than not! Ah, the nature of the board. Team makes questionable move and the board goes nuts. Team makes good moves and board is kinda quiet Report
February 24, 201115 yr Author comment_89281 Kinsd of a sad state that over the past few years, we've been going more nuts than not! Ape shit, I believe is the proper term...lol Report
February 24, 201115 yr Author comment_89282 So true. I really think this is the first time in a long while a vast majority of us agree on the needs. And a serious overwhelming majority agree on the 1st priority, OL. From there, we have some differing opinions on ranking DL, S and WR. If only the brain trust would consult us... I'll pine for that as I hope I win the Lotto... I agree and if Angelo fails to deliver a quality draft, I say Chuck U. Farley and send him on his way. Report
February 24, 201115 yr comment_89283 Hell, I want him gone regardless! I agree and if Angelo fails to deliver a quality draft, I say Chuck U. Farley and send him on his way. Report
February 24, 201115 yr comment_89285 Agreed. But I hope that's a good sign that everyone agrees, for the most part, on what the Bears need: OL, DL, S, WR. Expect it to get louder around the draft, and a hell of a lot louder if the Bears' management doesn't follow the agreed upon needs. Agreed except for the safety position unless Manning cannot be resigned...if he is signed I think we are fine there with Major Wright working into the mix and starters Harris and Manning....let's get one or two O linesman, a nice DT, and a big target WR. I still think we could really use a quality WR...maybe even in FA? Report
February 24, 201115 yr comment_89287 I say Tommie Harris gets cut soon unless he agrees to a new deal with a much lower price tag. Report
February 25, 201115 yr comment_89288 You guys are welcome to check out the Bears board on www.chicitysports.com/forum Report
February 25, 201115 yr comment_89289 Agreed except for the safety position unless Manning cannot be resigned...if he is signed I think we are fine there with Major Wright working into the mix and starters Harris and Manning....let's get one or two O linesman, a nice DT, and a big target WR. I still think we could really use a quality WR...maybe even in FA? For the record, I actually agree with more with you than not, but I included WR and S in there because several others have mentioned it. Personally, I want the following positions to be addressed: OT, DT, OG, C, DE, P, Backup QB...and I wouldn't be terribly upset if it happened in that order. Report
February 26, 201115 yr comment_89306 For the record, I actually agree with more with you than not, but I included WR and S in there because several others have mentioned it. Personally, I want the following positions to be addressed: OT, DT, OG, C, DE, P, Backup QB...and I wouldn't be terribly upset if it happened in that order. Not far off from my wish list, which would be OT, DT, WR, OG, and then best athlete type picks...maybe a LB as some of ours are a getting a bit old. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.