-
Posts
7,700 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About BearFan PHX
- Birthday 12/01/1965
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Phoenix Arizona (moved from nyc)
-
Interests
Family, Music, Recording, Chicago Bears
Recent Profile Visitors
32,501 profile views
BearFan PHX's Achievements
-
One wonders where Austin Booker is left in all of this. He's still young, and maybe he can come on this year, but it feels like his window to impress was only open a very short time. I know DA likes em bigger, but as a pash rush specialist, Booker could have a role on this team IF he is productive. He'd better bring it quick or he's gonna be gone before he even got a change to get his footing. Pressure is on, Booker. Prove us all wrong!
-
I think he was talking about Campbell playing upright, which is what I see too. around 2:35?
-
I know that he would make a great OG, but Im saying why consider that when he plays LT really well? I mean, you could probably take any really good starting LT in the league, and put them at OG and theyd be even better because LT is harder, you have no help. But why would that be any kind of negative on them playing LT? That they could be a better OG doesnt make them any less good as a LT than they are? Like saying Banks is a top notch LT, but he would be even better at basketball so we shouldnt draft him at LT? And Im saying, my opinion, Banks is a really good LT right now, and has TONS of untapped potential. I think with Roushar's help, if he is dedicated, the sky's the limit for him. Hes good now, but he has traits to be even better if he polishes up. And he's young. As to competing, yes. Whoever is the best player should start of course. If Banks is everything I say, and Jones shows up and kills everyone and dominates, then of course he is the starter. But Im saying I think that is less likely than Banks being that guy.
-
I think by the tape, Banks is a considerably better LT than Jones, and will grow. I dont think we will move him to OG. He would do well there too, but hes got the goods to play LT at a high level, so why move him inside?
-
Outstanding. This is basically my preferred draft, although i dont usually find a trade down, so id have to choose between Saywer and Fanning. I also oscillate on which DL it'll be in the 2nd. But this is the way.
-
Of course. Any player that kicks ass on the field earns the respect that this is currently their level. Nothing said before can ever overshadow what they do on the field, or put on tape. The only caveat to that is that a couple good games doesn't overshadow a long history. If you do it, and do it consistently over multiple weeks, or the whole season, especially when against good opponents, then hell yeah.
-
Yes, I was probably over speaking in passion in regards to the #10 pick, Warren will be a starter in this league somewhere. I just dont think he will shine in the NFL. I dont think his game translates to the kind of numbers he had in college. Id jump at him in the 3rd round, thatd be a no brainer, so his real value is somewhere between 70 and 10. Id say below 20, maybe lower. But I also want to repeat that Im just projecting how the player I saw on film will do in the NFL. So how their current toolbox will apply. There will be some players who will learn from NFL coaches and become a lot better. You can guess at who those will be too based on attitude, flashes of tools that they arent consistent with etc., but some player in the first round will shine and prove any doubters wrong. So Im not saying I KNOW Warren is gonna just be average in the NFL, but if I had to bet right now, that'd be my bet. I also think he's a bit of draft smoke all the GMs are using to disguise their true intentions. Maybe he will go early, but I wont be shocked if Warren slides on draft day.
-
Oh yeah, I forgot to include him, he's amazing too. I would love to us go R1 LT Banks, R2 DL/S, R2 HB Kaleb Johnson, R3 TE Fannin, and pick up WR Jack Bech and then go for depth. And in the 5th round TE Oronde Gadsden is pretty good too!
-
and Courtland Loveland is a true middle field matchup problem, just like McMillan is. Either one could play the LaPorta role better than Warren. And I know Johnson isn't going to replicate his Detroit offense here, but Warren doesnt really do anything that well. he just has big production numbers. He doesnt body people to get the ball well, and he certainly doesnt get away from anyone. he doesnt break well at the top of his route. He's just a poor man's Kmet. At least Kmet bodies people. They both run like Frankenstein. lol
-
If any player is going to be a HOF player for example, then yes of course you want them. But I dont see it with Warren. I see a lot of hype, but the film doesnt back it up. I don't even think he is the best TE in this draft. I think he had production in college because they had no WRs on his team, so they funneled the ball to him a lot, and schemed him open, but youre not going to hide him in the NFL. I didnt see him beating guys for balls, or blocking a ton, I didnt see spectacular catches, I saw a rumbling guy how found dead spots in zones and got the ball a lot. Kmet is better. It's another case of people (writers) reading stats and not watching film to put it into context. Same with Omarion Hampton. And again, it's not like i have some secret talent at film evaluation. ANYONE can see it if they watch the tape instead of reading the numbers and what other writers wrote about the numbers. If you watch a game that Tyler Warren is in with a 12 year old and say nothing, the kid is not begging you to buy his jersey at the end of it. that's as simple as this is.
-
I have no doubt that Braxton Jones will be motivated this year, but i dont think even his best will be good enough to be the LT on this team going forward. hes been a great value, and a team player when the roster sucked and holes were everywhere, but now that so many are filled, the spotlight turns to his position, one of the most important on the field, and hobbling along with a substandard player that needs Thuney next to him, and growth and motivation to project to succeed seems too much. I think the likelihood of Amagadje being our starting LT in 2 years is much greater than Braxton's and so of course I think we are spending a high pick on LT. I personally hope it's Banks at 10, but it could be Ersery at 41 for example.
-
Its so funny. The media narratives go round and round and every day its a different player. But if you watch the film, you don't need to be a genius, you just see it. And then you're where the media will end up months later from the beginning?
-
yeah, please do I had no idea!
-
I totally agree. Of course I want Banks at 10, but i can understand Jeanty or a Defensive lineman at 10 if you just cant pass them by. But Tyler Warren is not that good, hes dramatically overrated in my view. I thin Courtland Loveland is a better TE, and looks like LaPorta. Id understand a WR here like Golden even more than Warren. Yuck!
-
So of course we disagree, and that's cool. But I think the more the Bears talk about how happy they are with Braxton here a week before the draft, the better the chance of drafting an OT early - it's lying season, and if they werent looking at OT theyd want everyone to think they were? Doesnt prove anything of course, and even if it did, I have no idea how the draft falls, and if Jeanty is there whether hes the pick anyway even if I am right about LT. Id expect Ersery in the 2nd then, if he's still available, but even if Banks is everything I say he is, he still isn't the only player with talent in the draft. And this kind of goes back to a (friendly) debate you and I were having a few months ago, where i said they revamp the whole OL except for Wright, and you said theyd keep Tevin, and Bates would be healthy and Braxton would be LT. So far theyve overhauled a lot of it. Let's see if they finish that job. I just dont think that you can add Kiran and Braxton together because they dont both play at once. Whoever you put out there has to block that blind side, and Jones has shown he is susceptible to bull rushes, and you saw how Caleb was running for his life last year, not just from Braxton of course, but from all of them. So I think I predicted 4 new OL starters, and you had 1 or 2, and we are at 3 right now, so we'll see if it continues. I think the disciplined thing to do is to replace Jones, but I get the allure of Jeanty if he is there, so it may not be with 10, but probably by our last pick of the 2nd round. But I cant see passing ojn Banks for Warren or something like that. Maybe a DL is worth it. But not because we dont need a LT, but because someone else might just be a dominant player you cant pass up at 10? But in no way do i think we are set with Jones who may not even be ready for camp with his injury.