****!

D needs to step up here.  Too many missed tackles.  Can't allow GB to find a rhythm on offense.  Need to be more disruptive.  Hope Roquan isn't hurt too bad.

The Defense does not have an answer

Hope Roquan comes back. Fingers crossed. 
 

Shame that Danny was matched up on the speedy wideout

Cards are Up!

7 minutes ago, 50england50 said:

Hope Roquan comes back. Fingers crossed. 
 

Shame that Danny was matched up on the speedy wideout

Danny had no shot at cover a WR like that especially after faking the blitz.  That was too easy.   Can't gift them TD's

5 minutes ago, 50england50 said:

Shame that Danny was matched up on the speedy wideout

Hate to say it but Pagano tried to do a blitz and this is what happened. Unfortunately they had old man Danny T doing the coverage in the slot AND while pretending to blitz. If anyone that works better if you have Roquan in...or Urlacher. 

How can a receiver be that open?

7 minutes ago, Bertva said:

Cards are Up!

Don’t really want the Bears in the playoffs if they have to hope somebody else wins to do it. 

2 minutes ago, Bertva said:

How can a receiver be that open?

Daryl Johnston’s right.  They’ve figured something out with their #3 receiver.  That’s the D’s weakest link right now with NB (Shelly) and LB coverage in those situations.  With Smith out that’s a big issue.  

Any news on Roquan. Is he in the concussion protocol?

This is ND vs Bama. The Bears may be able to score by grinding out drives, but it doesn’t matter if GB scores with such ease.

5 minutes ago, jason said:

This is ND vs Bama. The Bears may be able to score by grinding out drives, but it doesn’t matter if GB scores with such ease.

This 100%.  Settling for FG's in the red zone won't help when we let GB do whatever they want on offense.   They also got a huge break on the "fumble" by Kmet he was down when the ball came loose, ruled wrong on the field and then again on review.  

7 minutes ago, jason said:

This is ND vs Bama. The Bears may be able to score by grinding out drives, but it doesn’t matter if GB scores with such ease.

Other than the Kmet (questionable) fumble and Triubiskys near miss at the end of the game, the offense is doing well.  They were playing smart Bears-type ball-control offense.  But with GB being able to do as they please on offense, won’t matter how good the Bears O plays.  
 

Weird to have to be worried about the D playing well.  

2 minutes ago, Alaskan Grizzly said:

Weird to have to be worried about the D playing well.  

Ironic isn't it.   The offense finally can do something then the D just escorts the opponent to the end zone.  We can never get even 2 of the 3 phases to play well in one game

They need to get pressure on Rogers.

A play on Defense!

Great series by the O come on D lets have another stop ?

If I haven’t said it enough it bears repeating that I love Moody!  He’s an absolute stud little receiver.  

D needs to make a play! and they !

 

How unlucky was the D. I hate Rogers he’s a jammy ?

Edit:  delete this post.  Apparently I had a moment of delusion. 

17 minutes ago, 50england50 said:

jammy

What’s a ‘jammy’?  Lol. 

Are the Packer D staying pretty pretty much in there lanes or are the starting to try to jump things?

 

and that's the ball game.  Down 12 with under 4 to go and it takes us forever to move the ball.  Red zone failure is the story of this game along with the D letting GB do whatever they want.