Here are the teams with extra picks in the top 3 rounds:

HOU: #2, #12, #33, #65, #73

SEA: #5, #20, #37, #51, #83

DET: #6, #18, #48, #55, #81

CAR: #9, #39, #61, #93

PHI: #10, #30, #62, #94

PIT: #17, #32, #49, #80

NYG: #25, #57, #89, #100

Even after blowing the 1st pick, HOU is still in decent shape, 5 picks in the top 73. SEA and DET both have 4 picks in the top 60. 

When I was thinking about trading partners, I was looking into which teams had more flexibility to move up. Compared to someone like IND, who the Bears are linked to, would basically not pick again until the 4th round if they move up to #1. 

With the sake  of

moving down a couple times ask from Indy to throw in Buckner for the 1 spot and then trade with Carolina for 4 and ask them to throw in  Burns in the deal. A front line of Rookie, Buckner, rookie, Burns might not be to bad. You eliminate the growing pains of a bunch of rookies in the DL.

Would you trade with Detroit to get 6, 48, 81 and a first next year?

Id rather 6, 18, and 55 and next years second.

1 hour ago, Stinger226 said:

With the sake  of

moving down a couple times ask from Indy to throw in Buckner for the 1 spot and then trade with Carolina for 4 and ask them to throw in  Burns in the deal. A front line of Rookie, Buckner, rookie, Burns might not be to bad. You eliminate the growing pains of a bunch of rookies in the DL.

Would you trade with Detroit to get 6, 48, 81 and a first next year?

Using the ole NFL trade value chart,

Detroit value:

Rd1-6=1600, rd1-18=900, rd2-55=350 and a 2024 2nd rd pick = 250-300.

Chicago pick 1 = 3000.

12 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said:

Using the ole NFL trade value chart,

Detroit value:

Rd1-6=1600, rd1-18=900, rd2-55=350 and a 2024 2nd rd pick = 250-300.

Chicago pick 1 = 3000

That would be two extra top 55 picks and could draft Tyree Wilson at that spot. Would you guys do that?, 6-18-53-55 

That's the old chart, and it doesnt fit what's been going on for the last 10 years. Here is the revised chart that more accurately fits the last 10 years of actual trades. Our #1 pick is worth more than the old chart would say.

https://www.patspulpit.com/2018/4/21/17256758/2018-nfl-draft-value-chart-rich-hill

Our pick is worth 1000 points.

Detroit would have to give:

R1 P6    (446 points)

R1 P18   (286 points)

R2 P17   (118 points)

2024 R1 pick  (150 points)

I'd take that in a heart beat. And that's just the FAIR value. If a bidding war starts, who knows what could happen.

3 minutes ago, BearFan PHX said:

That's the old chart, and it doesnt fit what's been going on for the last 10 years. Here is the revised chart that more accurately fits the last 10 years of actual trades. Our #1 pick is worth more than the old chart would say.

https://www.patspulpit.com/2018/4/21/17256758/2018-nfl-draft-value-chart-rich-hill

Glad to hear that then we could get a one for next instead of a two.

9 minutes ago, Stinger226 said:

Glad to hear that then we could get a one for next instead of a two.

I think whatever we do, we need that #1 next year. Its worth more to us strategically than the 2nd this year. If we got picks 6, 18 and a third rounder (under your chart) to make it a first next year, thatd be worth it.

Also remember a 2024 pick is worth one round later. So the 6th pick in the first round in 2024 is worth the 6th pick in the second round this year in value.

43 minutes ago, BearFan PHX said:

That's the old chart, and it doesnt fit what's been going on for the last 10 years. Here is the revised chart that more accurately fits the last 10 years of actual trades. Our #1 pick is worth more than the old chart would say.

https://www.patspulpit.com/2018/4/21/17256758/2018-nfl-draft-value-chart-rich-hill

Our pick is worth 1000 points.

Detroit would have to give:

R1 P6    (446 points)

R1 P18   (286 points)

R2 P17   (118 points)

2024 R1 pick  (150 points)

I'd take that in a heart beat. And that's just the FAIR value. If a bidding war starts, who knows what could happen.

I would do it. 

I knew there was a newer chart but had the old one saved.