Da Bears 88 Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Just wondering if we've seen the last of Lance Briggs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Well, I think he'll play football again somewhere, so I doubt that we've seen the last of him totally... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Right now it looks like it is the end of him in Chicago. However, I think we'll know more when we see whether the Bears spend big bucks on other positions early in FA (ie the offensive line position). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenom283 Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Yeah will see him, when hes tackling our RB behind the line of scrimmage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkBomber Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Yeah will see him, when hes tackling our RB behind the line of scrimmage. The jokes on you, we dont have a RB! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 I think the Briggs decision will depend a lot on how bad Urlacher's back turns out to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Just wondering if we've seen the last of Lance Briggs? I believe so. I don't think we can afford him. Too many bigger problems to fill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChileBear Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 I believe so. I don't think we can afford him. Too many bigger problems to fill. Think you're right about Briggs. Rosenhaus is going to get some team to pony up big $ and the Bears will say thanks, but no thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Think you're right about Briggs. Rosenhaus is going to get some team to pony up big $ and the Bears will say thanks, but no thanks. You said it Chile! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Think you're right about Briggs. Rosenhaus is going to get some team to pony up big $ and the Bears will say thanks, but no thanks. And whatever team winds up being the big spender that goes after him will probably wind up being one of those teams a lot of people thinks will surprise a lot of people next year. And, just like the team that spent a ton in FA last season, they'll implode next year for various reasons due in no small part to trying to fix problems by throwing money at them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 You must be referring to the Redskins. And whatever team winds up being the big spender that goes after him will probably wind up being one of those teams a lot of people thinks will surprise a lot of people next year. And, just like the team that spent a ton in FA last season, they'll implode next year for various reasons due in no small part to trying to fix problems by throwing money at them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 You must be referring to the Redskins. Actually, on that one I was casually referring to the 49ers, who spent a lot of money on a couple guys last season but wound up taking a big step backwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 True enough! Imagine if they didn't spend that though! They'd be right there with Miami hoping for one win! Actually, on that one I was casually referring to the 49ers, who spent a lot of money on a couple guys last season but wound up taking a big step backwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 True enough! Imagine if they didn't spend that though! They'd be right there with Miami hoping for one win! Well, if they didn't go "all out" to try to win this year, they probably wouldn't have convinced themselves that swapping their 08 pick for the Patriots' 07 pick was a good idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkBomber Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 I wouldnt be surprised to see the Niners or the Redskins make a good push for him. Rosenhaus has a ton of clients on the Redskins and deals with their front office a lot and they are always a team looking to net big name free agents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 I wouldnt be surprised to see the Niners or the Redskins make a good push for him. Rosenhaus has a ton of clients on the Redskins and deals with their front office a lot and they are always a team looking to net big name free agents. It's not nearly as detailed as the look that our guys took at the Bears cap status, but here's Peter King's analysis from a few weeks ago about where teams stood in relation to the 08 cap. The 9ers have more room than the Bears. The Redskins, uh, don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkBomber Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 It's not nearly as detailed as the look that our guys took at the Bears cap status, but here's Peter King's analysis from a few weeks ago about where teams stood in relation to the 08 cap. The 9ers have more room than the Bears. The Redskins, uh, don't. I saw that article a while ago and initially thought they were screwed cap wise. I think theyve been pretty good at maneuvering contracts and working the cap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattymac Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Briggs is very good, but not great. I'd love to have him back, and unless the Bears go after both Bryant Johnson and a top-flight O-lineman, I think they should make every effort to sign Briggs. He's young, good, and a core player on a championship caliber defense (when everyone's healthy). While I feel the focus of this off-season should be squarely on improving the offense, I'm trying to look at this from the perspective of the overall impact on the team. Losing Briggs probably would hurt us more than signing any of the available offensive free agents would help us. Our biggest area of need is the OL, and this year the best available talent is in the draft, not free agency. All this considered, it won't break my heart if Angelo lets Briggs walk. He's been a beneficiary of playing with a lot of great players in Chicago, and I think Jamar Williams is a capable football player, so it's not liek we're doomed if we let him go...I just think we're better with him than without him, and I don't see a lot of areas where that money would be better spent, based on available free agents. Gonna be a damn interesting off-season, and I'm very anxious to hear what Angelo has to say tomorrow... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 They're a poorly run franchise (SF). I'm sure the Pat's knew exactly what they were doing, laughing all the way to the bank! Well, if they didn't go "all out" to try to win this year, they probably wouldn't have convinced themselves that swapping their 08 pick for the Patriots' 07 pick was a good idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.