3 hours ago3 hr comment_233512 So are we all in agreement they won't be trading for Garrett? He's going to be 31 this season, he's not going to sit out a season no matter how much he dislikes the Browns off-season plans. Of course another team may give them what they want. Report
2 hours ago2 hr comment_233514 7 minutes ago, Stinger226 said:So are we all in agreement they won't be trading for Garrett?He's going to be 31 this season, he's not going to sit out a season no matter how much he dislikes the Browns off-season plans. Of course another team may give them what they want.It depends on the price. If they would take 2 firsts, we'd have a welcome parade. Report
2 hours ago2 hr comment_233515 Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players. Report
2 hours ago2 hr comment_233516 1 minute ago, Stinger226 said:Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players.He's aging and had a ton of snaps to break the sack record. I'm leary... Report
28 minutes ago28 min Author comment_233517 2 hours ago, Stinger226 said:Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players.The reason is if Garrett is holding out, then they either get something for him, or nothing. That's why they'd take less. But they ONLY have to take as little a price as the second highest bidding team Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.