20 hours ago20 hr comment_236334 8 minutes ago, Pixote said:Let's hope he doesn't wind up in Minnesota.With Jones and Mason in MIN, it feels like RB is a bigger need in GB. Report
20 hours ago20 hr comment_236335 27 minutes ago, adam said:With Jones and Mason in MIN, it feels like RB is a bigger need in GB.I don't think GB has given up on Jacobs. Jones is injured again (needs to hang it up), and Mason is a far cry from a difference-maker.I know there is no chance in hell it would happen, but could you imagine Taylor lined up behind Caleb? Report
12 hours ago12 hr comment_236338 8 hours ago, Pixote said:I don't think GB has given up on Jacobs. Jones is injured again (needs to hang it up), and Mason is a far cry from a difference-maker.I know there is no chance in hell it would happen, but could you imagine Taylor lined up behind Caleb?Taylor would be bonkers in Johnson's offense.With all the legal stuff going on with Jacobs and the fact that he is actually running worse than the backups they were already playing seems like they may have less patience with the legal stuff. We will see. Report
5 hours ago5 hr comment_236342 Almost every site I visit for Bears info has strong rumors that we are still trying to get K Mack to add to our defense, even after acquiring Simmons. They say it would cost a late-day 3 pick and about $8 million this year. Report
1 hour ago1 hr Author comment_236346 I agree, and was trying to post this earlier before my job got in my way. There is still a lot of noise about Mack returning to the Bears. I didn’t view him as a worthwhile centerpiece to get our D over the top but adding him to a front anchored by Jeffrey Simmons is different. Reportedly Mack wants out of LA and a shot at a Superbowl…don’t know if that’s true of just media speculation. It would make sense for an elite vet in what might be his last season. I’m surprised to see him, at age 35, still handling starter amount of snaps but maybe I shouldn’t be. If this trade were to happen I don’t know how we fit him in under the salary cap so it seems like we might be sending them a player. I don’t see anyone they’d want but I would absolutely trade Sweat for Mack.Since I”m already troling around the AI search:"Khalil Mack played 68% of the Los Angeles Chargers defensive snaps in the 2026 season. This figure represents his snap participation through the first six games of that season, during which he recorded 11 solo tackles and 3 sacks." Report
57 minutes ago57 min comment_236347 I’m not giving up more than say a 5th and we get a 6th back or something. If im making a trade I am getting a DB. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.