Good article. I like both players but I see more upside with Roach's youth.

 

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/be...-bear07.article

 

Peace

It appears Pisa still isn't 100% recovered from the knee injury, although he must be pretty close. If Pisa ends up the backup that's not bad depth at all, and it also means Roach is playing better now than when he lost the battle last year.

Good article. I like both players but I see more upside with Roach's youth.

 

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/be...-bear07.article

 

Peace

Agreed. Roach was a tackling machine last year. The experience he gained was huge for his development. We can't go qrong with either guy.

I still think Pisa has more upsite. While Roach may be younger, I simply don't see him as much more than an average player. Pisa I see more as a playmaker. Either way, this is a good situation to have though. So long as both are happy, we should be solid with whoever wins, and have great depth to boot.

 

Good article. I like both players but I see more upside with Roach's youth.

 

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/be...-bear07.article

 

Peace

 

I still think Pisa has more upsite. While Roach may be younger, I simply don't see him as much more than an average player. Pisa I see more as a playmaker. Either way, this is a good situation to have though. So long as both are happy, we should be solid with whoever wins, and have great depth to boot.

 

 

If ya can't stay on the field what good is upside?

In All fairness Flea, Pisa really had not missed many games prior to that injury. or did he?

Active in all games 4 out of 7 years. But only 1 year in the last four.

http://www.nfl.com/players/pisatinoisamoa/...le?id=TIN225467