AZ54

You only gave two options; keeping him or losing him. It's the third option: replacing him in a more cost effective manner that might make us a better team overall as it would not only replace most of his production but allow us to sign another player that would also improve the offense. If the money gets ridiculous I think there's enough options in FA at WR and in the draft to solve this problem.

Read somewhere this week that Ced had been paid 13.8 million so far.

He's a great 3rd QB, relatively cheap and with enough experience that he doesn't need reps in practice. Look at the AZ Cardinals whose 3rd QB is Anquan Boldin and tell me that a guy like Griese isn't a better option. More likely if a team is in a spot where they'll be spending a 5/6/7 rd pick on a QB to fill that 3rd spot trading that pick for Griese might make more sense. Especially if you don't have much confidence in your #2 QB.

I think in the end we'll just draft a guy to compete at RB. Adrian Peterson is on the way out unless Benson comes back poorly from his injury. In that case Ced gets cut in camp and we keep AP, new guy, and Wolfe.

After reading the Suntimes article http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2008/02/mo...offense_ag.html I started laughing at this line: RAY BUCHANAN: “Not too really burn a bridge with the Chicago Bears man, but what was it like not really being able to be yourself? I know the Moose that we’ve seen back in Carolina, but tell them what it was like actually being there with Chicago.” I would love to see what Ray says when he sees Moose has no speed and no quickness on top of the questionable hands. Just how exactly is an OC supposed to use a guy that can't run away from anyone and needs 3 steps to come out of a cut and drops a significant % of passes that hit his hands? Equipment manager comes to mind.

I totally agree. Right now with the cash available we can probably sign two good WR that will help us more than Berrian alone. Then draft one more. I think we tendered Davis as a stopgap in case everything falls apart on us but he doesn't offer much as a slot WR. I don't want him back and hope we find another option. Keep Hester and Bradley sign two FA WR, one a good second tier guy, one a third tier depth player with experience to compete with Hass. Draft another WR in the 3rd round. It's a lot of turnover at the WR spot but given what we had last year those numbers (and drops) aren't a difficult thing to replace. ON top of that I think Olsen will really shine this year and become our go to guy.

It's easy to say he may lose a step after the surgery. He might also gain a step if he actually works hard at rehab. Right now none of us know. Regardless we need help at RB.

I'd rather have the LT who can anchor that position for the next 7-10 years instead of a stopgap that leaves us in the same spot in a year or two. You don't get many chances to do that so when opportunity is knocking it's best to answer the door. Decent OG are easier to find than LT so fill that in later rounds or with one of the FAs available.

Not interested in Colvin for all the reasons other already listed. Just doesn't fit the scheme.

Josh Barrett. I like him a lot athletically but he seems a bit raw (i.e. late reacting) in how he plays the position. Definitely worth a look on day 2. Had he stayed healthy ASU would have made a bigger finish at the end of the year, he was that important to their defense.

I'd be happy if we picked up Hester on the second day. I like the way he runs and (from what I've read) he blocks well too. I think he'd block as well as McKie but his versatility out of the backfield is what could really change things for us. I think he'd also be good enough to fill in as the RB if injuries depleted the roster. Of course, that's only if the Oline gets upgraded. I'd still keep Wolfe and get rid of Runnels or McKie.

I'll add one more thing I really want in a QB and that is accuracy in hitting a WR in stride. The QB needs intelligence enough (at least football smarts) to understand what a defense is doing but no matter what, passing windows in the NFL are often small even 30 yards downfield and the QB has to be able to get the ball in there. It's a big reason I'm no fan of QBs who come from systems that run a lot of hooks or sit-down routes. I'll name one guy, Akili Smith, who in college could only hit a WR when he stopped. He still got a big contract because of his measurables but couldn't do anything in the NFL. I'll also add that a QB who can't consistently complete passes to a WR in stride might not be that good at reading what a defense is doing.

The Hawaii WRs seem to be nothing more than just a replacement for Davis, same type of player. And since we already have that guy on the roster who knows the plays why make the pick? I agree with those guys being picked in the 7th Rd but I just don't see it as much of an upgrade. If he's there I'd rather pick Dennis Dixon with the plan to just put him on IR. We will be drafting another QB much earlier than that but we also have Rex to experiment with for one more year and Orton for two more years. If neither Rex nor Orton show enough to warrant being our starter in 2009 then we can cut ties with Rex, let the high draft pick take the reigns in '09 with Orton as the #2 and Dixon as the #3. We have a year to evaluate Dixon and if he doesn't look like he's got a future in the NFL then we can draft a #3 or find one in FA.

I get it and I like it. $5 mil bonus for a couple more years on the contract. TE is the most injured position in the NFL and having two solid players there is a huge boost to consistency on the offense. As stated above it also gives us more options in receiving since there are so many questions about who our starting WRs will be next year. It can also help our Oline since there are so many questions about who will be starting there as well.

I'd take Bryant Johnson too over Stallworth.

Everyone is not on board with taking Flacco in the first round, or second round for that matter. He's a project QB IMO, one with some good physical talents but he'll need one year at a minimum to contribute but likely at least two. My doubts are also based on his accuracy, or lack thereof and in the NFL that will kill you. Can that improve if his mechanics improve? Likely. Then there's the level of competition he's played against and it's nowhere near as fast as the NFL defenses. Think about what Danieal Manning was like (still is) when it comes to reacting to plays. If we go with a QB on day two then he should be in the mix but not on day one IMO.

No it's a 1 year 3mil deal with 1.5 mil in bonus. Rex can earn a total of 5mil if he hits performance incentives. I would bet being the starter on week one is one of them.

Maybe a valid point but I still remember Orlando Pace running down some DB after an INT. I think he chased the guy about 50 yards and tackled him. So while I agree the 40 time isn't a defining stat for an OT the slow time does point out that his quickness and athletic ability might not be as good as people thought. This is important for a LT (which is what we need) because at times a quick DE will get the outside edge and the OT has to run with them and push them behind the pocket. Slow feet won't allow a guy to make that play. In this case the scouts have to look at other tests and definitely see what's on film against first rate pass rushers. More important for lineman I think are the splits when they run: 10yds, 20yds.

I don't think we're drafting Flacco. Too much hype linking the Bears and Flacco which means there's a high probability JA is using him as a smoke screen of the QB we'd really like to have. Next question is how much cap space will we save when Griese is gone. Going back to LT2's excellent cap analysis it seems we'll take a hit of -$100k when he's gone. I doubt he gets cut before the draft as that would not help us in anyway. Will we be able to trade him for a late round pick after the draft? Or if we draft a QB early in the draft could we trade Griese on day 2 of the draft? He'd make more sense for a team needing a 3rd string QB than going with a 5th Rd draft pick.

I'm thinking there was more of an agreement that he would not get tagged by them when he signed that 1 yr contract. He lived up to his end of the bargain and played great all year. He's just too talented of a player in that offense for them to allow him to just walk away. To put it another way: If the organization was willing to tag Asante Samuel then they'd be willing to tag Moss.

If the Vikings sign Berrian he'll love catching passes from Travaris Jackson. Unless money is far and away better than other offers I suspect BB will look at the big picture as far as who is throwing the ball.

I really think we're going after Bryant Johnson. He's young enough to have his best years ahead of him. Physically talented enough to be a better overall WR than Berrian and he's probably going to cost less.

That's because nothing happened today except watching guys walk around in their underwear. Things pick up a bit tomorrow and the real action is over the weekend. http://www.nfl.com/combine Live Workouts: Hosted by Rich Eisen with NFL Network analysts Charles Davis, Mike Mayock and Rod Woodson providing daily reports on the prospects participating in the workouts. Airs live Saturday, Feb. 23 through Tuesday, Feb. 26 beginning at 11 a.m. ET each day. Schedule: Sat: Oline, TE, specialists Sun: QBs, RBs, WR Mon: Dline, LB Tue: CB, Safeties.

I thought the tag was gonna get placed on him but I was wrong. Although we'll never know I'm really curious what JA's limit is on the salary he's willing to pay BB.

I hope your wrong. 1200 yds does not come anywhere close to impressing me. It's a measly 75yds/game.