Jump to content

THE BEAST of an off-season


Stinger226

Recommended Posts

We need to look at the overall off-season to see what Poles has accomplished this year.

Got the best coach on the market and spent good money on assistants. 

Added to both lines with quality additions. Added contracts for Gordon and Jackson who were on last years. 

The draft gave us 4 quality players in the first 4 picks. 2 potential all pro types and 2 first year contributors. 

The rest of the draft gave us high risk high upside players.

Dane Brugler has the most complete draft guide on the market. Well respected in football circles.

We ended up with 4 top 100 prospects. Loveland -11, Burden-27, Turner -56, Trapilo -79 

He had mentions of all our draft picks on his draft guide. I thought they were obscure but people were aware of them.

 Hiopolote 35th LB 

Zak Frasier 23rd CB 

Newman 22nd OG 

Monangai 20th RB.

I think this were high ceiling high risk type picks. 

It's going to be 2 years before we can start rating this draft.

Lots of people saying Monangai is a dark horse good RB that fits what the bears are looking for. 

We have a front row seat to a winning season whether fans think it still has problems or not. The off-season is not over yet, now rumors of Nick Chubb. It never stops.

Enjoy the ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The league is a head-to-head league, and normally when one team gets better another team gets worse, at least relatively speaking. 

The Bears had a huge gap to make up in the division as a 5-win team this offseason. Every other team made the playoffs and had no less than 11 wins.  So to close the gap, they needed a massive coaching staff upgrade, check, an impactful free agency, check, and a really solid draft, check. It still means nothing until Week 1, but the groundwork is in place to be in the mix with DET, MIN, and GB this season. 

There is a good chance that the entire NFCN has 10+ wins. I think DET and MIN will come down to earth, GB will be around 9-10 wins, and CHI will be somewhere in the mix. The 4th place team in the NFCN probably misses the playoffs again, and they may be a 10 win team. I am hoping the Bears can get to 11 wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, adam said:

The league is a head-to-head league, and normally when one team gets better another team gets worse, at least relatively speaking. 

The Bears had a huge gap to make up in the division as a 5-win team this offseason. Every other team made the playoffs and had no less than 11 wins.  So to close the gap, they needed a massive coaching staff upgrade, check, an impactful free agency, check, and a really solid draft, check. It still means nothing until Week 1, but the groundwork is in place to be in the mix with DET, MIN, and GB this season. 

There is a good chance that the entire NFCN has 10+ wins. I think DET and MIN will come down to earth, GB will be around 9-10 wins, and CHI will be somewhere in the mix. The 4th place team in the NFCN probably misses the playoffs again, and they may be a 10 win team. I am hoping the Bears can get to 11 wins.

I think youre right in the ballpark. We had 5 wins last year, but it should have been 8 if Flus didnt mess up the end games. Clearly we are a MUCH better roster this year, and the gameplans will be superior as well.

I figure 10 or 11 wins and a playoff appearance. Like always, I wont put a ceiling on what the team could be in December - if they gel, who knows how far they could go, but as it stands right now, I think 10 or 11 wins is about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BearFan PHX said:

I think youre right in the ballpark. We had 5 wins last year, but it should have been 8 if Flus didnt mess up the end games. Clearly we are a MUCH better roster this year, and the gameplans will be superior as well.

I figure 10 or 11 wins and a playoff appearance. Like always, I wont put a ceiling on what the team could be in December - if they gel, who knows how far they could go, but as it stands right now, I think 10 or 11 wins is about right.

Correct we played well enough to reach 9-10 wins. But the calamity of Flus and lame OCs prevented that. 4-2 and should have been 5-2, boom, the team quit on him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Stinger226 said:

Correct we played well enough to reach 9-10 wins. But the calamity of Flus and lame OCs prevented that. 4-2 and should have been 5-2, boom, the team quit on him 

yup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...