1 hour ago1 hr comment_233512 So are we all in agreement they won't be trading for Garrett? He's going to be 31 this season, he's not going to sit out a season no matter how much he dislikes the Browns off-season plans. Of course another team may give them what they want. Report
1 hour ago1 hr comment_233514 7 minutes ago, Stinger226 said:So are we all in agreement they won't be trading for Garrett?He's going to be 31 this season, he's not going to sit out a season no matter how much he dislikes the Browns off-season plans. Of course another team may give them what they want.It depends on the price. If they would take 2 firsts, we'd have a welcome parade. Report
1 hour ago1 hr comment_233515 Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players. Report
1 hour ago1 hr comment_233516 1 minute ago, Stinger226 said:Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players.He's aging and had a ton of snaps to break the sack record. I'm leary... Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.