Tuesday at 02:14 AM5 days comment_233512 So are we all in agreement they won't be trading for Garrett? He's going to be 31 this season, he's not going to sit out a season no matter how much he dislikes the Browns off-season plans. Of course another team may give them what they want. Report
Tuesday at 02:24 AM5 days comment_233514 7 minutes ago, Stinger226 said:So are we all in agreement they won't be trading for Garrett?He's going to be 31 this season, he's not going to sit out a season no matter how much he dislikes the Browns off-season plans. Of course another team may give them what they want.It depends on the price. If they would take 2 firsts, we'd have a welcome parade. Report
Tuesday at 02:29 AM5 days comment_233515 Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players. Report
Tuesday at 02:33 AM5 days comment_233516 1 minute ago, Stinger226 said:Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players.He's aging and had a ton of snaps to break the sack record. I'm leary... Report
Tuesday at 04:49 AM5 days Author comment_233517 2 hours ago, Stinger226 said:Not sure why they would settle for less than they want for the best defensive player in the league. Several think 3 firsts or 2 and a significant player. My guess is a young cheap option not high salary players.The reason is if Garrett is holding out, then they either get something for him, or nothing. That's why they'd take less. But they ONLY have to take as little a price as the second highest bidding team Report
Tuesday at 11:49 AM4 days comment_233520 6 hours ago, BearFan PHX said:The reason is if Garrett is holding out, then they either get something for him, or nothing. That's why they'd take less. But they ONLY have to take as little a price as the second highest bidding team He's going to be 31 this football year, I doubt if he sits out or forces a trade. He has no leverage. He literally talked to the organization to change some contract language. Doesn't seem to me to be a failsafe point yet. He wants the sack record meaning he has to play. Report
Tuesday at 04:50 PM4 days comment_233524 Or does he want the sack record and a Super Bowl ring? Report
Wednesday at 12:01 AM4 days comment_233532 7 hours ago, AZ54 said:Or does he want the sack record and a Super Bowl ring?I'm sure he does, I just don't think the bears are giving up that much capital for Garrett. Not sure why the Browns would trade their best assert when Crosby cost 2 1sts and Parsons got 2 firsts and a quality player. Report
8 hours ago8 hr comment_233599 An all-pro shutdown CB could only take care of one WR, Myles Garrett can shut down the whole offense. 2 firsts and a 2026 second, my final offer. Report
7 hours ago7 hr Author comment_233600 right. with a pass rush ALL your defenders get "better" at coverage.Edge is a force multiplier for sure. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.