March 21, 200917 yr comment_60764 Bears | Earl agrees to one-year deal Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:57:08 -0700 Updating a previous item, Vaughn McClure, of the Chicago Tribune, reports free-agent S Glenn Earl (Texans) agreed to terms on a one-year deal with the Chicago Bears. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Report
March 21, 200917 yr comment_60774 Bears | Earl agrees to one-year deal Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:57:08 -0700 Updating a previous item, Vaughn McClure, of the Chicago Tribune, reports free-agent S Glenn Earl (Texans) agreed to terms on a one-year deal with the Chicago Bears. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wow, waking up to good news. I am starting to enjoy the day already. lol. I don't know what it is but I have always been high on this guy. Report
March 21, 200917 yr comment_60775 Wow, waking up to good news. I am starting to enjoy the day already. lol. I don't know what it is but I have always been high on this guy. Finally we are starting to sign people! The fact it is just another body that could be a training camp cut, but I guess I will be positive. Report
March 21, 200917 yr comment_60776 Bears | Earl agrees to one-year deal Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:57:08 -0700 Updating a previous item, Vaughn McClure, of the Chicago Tribune, reports free-agent S Glenn Earl (Texans) agreed to terms on a one-year deal with the Chicago Bears. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Chicago Sun Times reported yesterday that we would sign him purely for depth. My guess is he's likely to not make the team, unless we're desperate. Report
March 21, 200917 yr comment_60786 I think this is the signing of a former starter in the league who got cut when injured. If healthy he could be a good signing Report
March 21, 200917 yr Author comment_60791 I think this is the signing of a former starter in the league who got cut when injured. If healthy he could be a good signing I would have just taken the FS from ND Burton instead of Earl Report
March 22, 200917 yr comment_60797 I would have just taken the FS from ND Burton instead of Earl No reason not to get both. Report
March 22, 200917 yr comment_60803 I would have just taken the FS from ND Burton instead of Earl That requires he is available when we want to draft him. Peace Report
March 22, 200917 yr Author comment_60806 That requires he is available when we want to draft him. Peace Yes i think he will be there in the 3rd round but Earl will whined up being cut Report
March 22, 200917 yr comment_60813 Yes i think he will be there in the 3rd round but Earl will whined up being cut I don't think they gave Earl a bonus so there is absolutely no risk. Peace Report
March 23, 200917 yr comment_60869 If he's completely healthy it could be a good signing, if not the deals ias most likely minimum so no foul Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.