Stinger226 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 This draft seems realistic to me as far as the Bears view players and needs. 2-Johnson/DE/Georgia Tech 3-Beckwith/LB/LSU 4-Barden/WR/Cal Poly 5a-Turner/WR/USC 5b-Hamlin/FS/Clem 6-Brewster/OT/Ball State 7a-Fletcher/CB/Iowa 7b-McCall/FB/Ala They view defense a priority, they think they can get DBs in later rounds, and draft a couple of WRs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I'd be content with that. I'd prefer an OL taken higher...but I don't see that in the cards with our off-season moves so far and JA's history... This draft seems realistic to me as far as the Bears view players and needs. 2-Johnson/DE/Georgia Tech 3-Beckwith/LB/LSU 4-Barden/WR/Cal Poly 5a-Turner/WR/USC 5b-Hamlin/FS/Clem 6-Brewster/OT/Ball State 7a-Fletcher/CB/Iowa 7b-McCall/FB/Ala They view defense a priority, they think they can get DBs in later rounds, and draft a couple of WRs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 This draft seems realistic to me as far as the Bears view players and needs. 2-Johnson/DE/Georgia Tech 3-Beckwith/LB/LSU 4-Barden/WR/Cal Poly 5a-Turner/WR/USC 5b-Hamlin/FS/Clem 6-Brewster/OT/Ball State 7a-Fletcher/CB/Iowa 7b-McCall/FB/Ala They view defense a priority, they think they can get DBs in later rounds, and draft a couple of WRs. Overall, not bad, I'd be a bit surprised. But drafting a LB that high is ridiculous considering the talent on the team and the deficiencies at other positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defiantgiant Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 This draft seems realistic to me as far as the Bears view players and needs. 2-Johnson/DE/Georgia Tech 3-Beckwith/LB/LSU 4-Barden/WR/Cal Poly 5a-Turner/WR/USC 5b-Hamlin/FS/Clem 6-Brewster/OT/Ball State 7a-Fletcher/CB/Iowa 7b-McCall/FB/Ala They view defense a priority, they think they can get DBs in later rounds, and draft a couple of WRs. I like this draft from round 4 onward, but it would be insane for the Bears to spend their 3rd on a linebacker, and Johnson is like a less-talented, rawer version of Vernon Gholston. He's going to be a massive bust for whoever's dumb enough to take him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 PS - I still like your mock best! And I do say go for the recipe! Overall, not bad, I'd be a bit surprised. But drafting a LB that high is ridiculous considering the talent on the team and the deficiencies at other positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 This draft seems realistic to me as far as the Bears view players and needs. 2-Johnson/DE/Georgia Tech 3-Beckwith/LB/LSU 4-Barden/WR/Cal Poly 5a-Turner/WR/USC 5b-Hamlin/FS/Clem 6-Brewster/OT/Ball State 7a-Fletcher/CB/Iowa 7b-McCall/FB/Ala They view defense a priority, they think they can get DBs in later rounds, and draft a couple of WRs. Where is the VOMIT icon? i need it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Where is the VOMIT icon? i need it.... When you find it let me know. I have no desire for a part time college DE to join our team with the 2nd Rd pick. Johnson is lazy and it's naive to think Marinelli or anyone will get him to be different once he has lots of money to spend. The LB too would be another part time player (SLB), if he sees the field. Grabbing a WR in Rd 2 might also be a part time player for us this year but it's a lot bigger need. If that fails then grab a FS who is likely to be a fulltime player on D again where we have a huge hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.