adam Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2009/08/du...n_harrison.html Tony Dungy didn't hesitate stepping out and questioning the leadership ability of Jay Cutler earlier this year, something he wasn't alone in doing, but now he's got a suggestion for the Bears. Sign Marvin Harrison if you need a wide receiver. Speaking earlier today on the Waddle and Silvy Show on ESPN-1000, Dungy said that the former all-pro can contribute this season. "Yeah, Marvin can play the game,'' Dungy said. "Marvin can get open and catch the ball. Marvin's whole thing is precision. And he's the guy that needs work in a system, you know. I think he definitely can play and I would encourage Lovie to sign him if they had that opening." Now that Dungy has helped Michael Vick land work with the Philadelphia Eagles, maybe he can make something happen for Harrison. The 36-year-old probably isn't going to jump at any offer but a club with an established quarterback could surely land him. In 13 seasons he has amassed 1,102 catches for 14,580 yards and 128 touchdowns. Would he be worth it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 At this point, why the hell not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 When did Dungy become an agent? Harrison would be with a team if his contract demands weren't so high. Now it appears that demand might just be getting lower but it's too late IMO unless some injuries hit us. I know we don't have a great WR corps but I like the talent and I prefer to let them go through the growing pains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I think the Bears are pretty set on sticking with the receivers they have now. If Marvin Harrison could play anymore he would probably be with a team by now. We aren't the only team that needs receivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I think the Bears are pretty set on sticking with the receivers they have now. If Marvin Harrison could play anymore he would probably be with a team by now. We aren't the only team that needs receivers. Thats sad to hear =( I dont really care so much for harrison, hes washed up i think. But our guys are just god awful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Thats sad to hear =( I dont really care so much for harrison, hes washed up i think. But our guys are just god awful JA and company have been known for a stubborn streak. I have a feeling if they don't see what they want to see, desparate measures wll be taken. They have too much money and have invested too much already to let the Cutler deal be a failure. I'm simply the most worried about the D. That being said, I think the O will hold it's own as the season wears on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butkusrules Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2009/08/du...n_harrison.html Would he be worth it? If you heard" that interview , Dungy was asked about it and while he said those words he could not be less emotional or enthusiastic about it. What is he supposed to say. "Marvin to the Bears?.....No Marvin is washed up? Frankly I think Marvin Harrison in Chicago would be nothing but trouble. He is at the end of his career and was used to being served filet mignon from one of the best QB's of all time. He has won his super bowl and he has nothing to play for but a few bucks. Plus the more I read about the gun/club incident the less and less I trust him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackerDog Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Plus the more I read about the gun/club incident the less and less I trust him. Yep... http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4359721 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Yep... http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4359721 That's from almost a month ago. And if you haven't heard, the main guy claiming Harrison shot him, got shot AGAIN last month by someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackerDog Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 That's from almost a month ago. And if you haven't heard, the main guy claiming Harrison shot him, got shot AGAIN last month by someone else. That's in the article I posted. There's something going on there that I don't think the Bears need to be part of. Unless he comes cheaply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 It's not even worth the drama for a penny.... Unless he comes cheaply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackerDog Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 It's not even worth the drama for a penny.... What's weird is that I thought, up until all of this stuff happened, that Harrison was one of the good guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Me too. Maybe it is relative as Harrison plays a position with so many "characters" and stayed out of real trouble, but in the last year or so, it really just seems like a lot of stuff kept hidden is coming out. I am not just talking about the gun/club issue, but how so many question his leadership and character in the clubhouse, which I never realized was even questionable. What's weird is that I thought, up until all of this stuff happened, that Harrison was one of the good guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I hear ya! I did too... Man, I swear if the game didnt need WR's, I'd rather not have any!!! What's weird is that I thought, up until all of this stuff happened, that Harrison was one of the good guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Thats sad to hear =( I dont really care so much for harrison, hes washed up i think. But our guys are just god awful Bennett looked pretty damn good against the Giants when he snagged one off the grass and caught another diving bomb from Cutler. Oh, and Hester looked pretty damn good when he inhaled a rocket acrossed his body when Cutler was rolling out...not to mention the fact that he would have easily had a TD if Cutler had hit him when he was WAAAY behind the defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Bennett looked pretty damn good against the Giants when he snagged one off the grass and caught another diving bomb from Cutler. Oh, and Hester looked pretty damn good when he inhaled a rocket acrossed his body when Cutler was rolling out...not to mention the fact that he would have easily had a TD if Cutler had hit him when he was WAAAY behind the defense. Cutler threw the ball to the spot Hester would have been at if he (Hester) didn't stop running. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Cutler threw the ball to the spot Hester would have been at if he (Hester) didn't stop running. Since I don't know the play call, I can't say who is right. Hester did pause, but once again, I don't know what they were supposed to do. To say that Cutler threw the ball to the spot Hester "would" have been is conjecture at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Sorry, but no way. What play call in the world has a WR run 50 yards down field and hessitate? @#$% happens, but I think it pretty obvious Hester simply mis-judged the ball. Hey, that isn't the end of the world. He and Cutler have time to get their timing down. Something like that doesn't happen over night. But there is no way you can put that on Cutler. He threw a good back. Hester simply misjudged it, hesitated a bit, and wasn't able to make the play. Since I don't know the play call, I can't say who is right. Hester did pause, but once again, I don't know what they were supposed to do. To say that Cutler threw the ball to the spot Hester "would" have been is conjecture at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.