All Activity
Today
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
Flashback to Lamarr Houston's celebration sack. Hate to see great players injured, but Bears can use the help.
-
Ben Johnson Thread
The NFL always likes to take it to the Bears, probably bc the owners still hold traditional values and are not in the elite wealthylevel like many other owners If the Bears received those (2) 3rd comp picks, my god how much better they could be. 2026, DT Gracen Halten who SF took round 4 who looks real with 15 tkl and 2 sacks in 5 games. He fractured his ankle, so out now but a 3T for years. Then for 2027, another top 100 prospect would help ease the loss of the 1st.
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
I just watched the video of both the Maye sack, which was an illegal hip drop tackle from behind (no flag), and then the Hutchinson celebration. I assume Maye had his ankle rolled up on. With Hutchinson you can see his right knee buckle laterally as he lands after the jump. To my uneducated medical opinion that lateral movement of the knee looks like a classic torn ACL.
-
New Stadium Proposal
Yeah, you guys are probably correct. When I first read it, the deal sounded awesome. Now, after you guys pointed out the flaws, unrealistic and wishful thinking. The Illinois legislators are supposed to reconvene in Springfield this month. Let's see if they vote to keep the Bears in Illinois.
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
NE played the easiest schedule in NFL history last year and somehow lucked into the easiest path to a Super Bowl as well (home against LAC and HOU, and then DEN w/o Nix). So them about to be 5-5 is not surprising at all. I would say they are probably a fringe playoff team, but get 4 automatic wins a year against NYJ and MIA. The Hutchinson injury is huge. He was one of the best Edge in the NFL, yet the DET defense was 30th in yards and 17th in pts. I would suspect both of those get worse with Hutchinson out. They were one of the best in sacks and pressures with most coming from Hutchinson.
-
New Stadium Proposal
First off there's a $10B price tag in a state that is bankrupt and can't afford the more economical options that I think are in the $4-5B range. The state of IL has said repeatedly they have no money to help finance anything. That's fair, they don't so where is all the money for this massive project coming from? Where are the Bears going to come up with all the additional money? These developers threw out a bunch of wishlist money/investors but there's literally nothing behind it. Then there is the timeline at this new location. They first have to build all the new housing, only then can they tear down existing site and begin the stadium construction process. Lawmakers have already said there is no way they'd approve anything until all the families have moved into the new housing locations. After 4 years of bad faith negotiations why would the Bears want to go even deeper into that morass? At this point the team should just take the only viable option to remain in the area and move to the IN site.
-
Ben Johnson Thread
Nah. Goodell just loves being an a** wipe. He couldn't care less about straightening out the poor officiating. He couldn't care less about making sure fans can watch all Prime Time games without having to take out a loan to buy all the streaming services needed for the exclusive broadcasts. And he enjoys just being a bully, a clueless jerk.
-
Ben Johnson Thread
I think the Bears chose the right path using all assets to place around their new investment drafted QB to start this new era. Sure, the defense sacrificed from it, but now that the offense is established we are seeing the work being placed to get the defense back to were it needs to be. Thinking of how the Bears are now a top contender, maybe Goodell seen this and why they said you are not getting those two comp picks.
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
I wanted to see NEP beat DET to keep them from tying for 1st with the Bears. Ain't going to happen. NEP "are not" what many thought they were. However, this seems like a bad one for both winner and loser. NEP has Maye injured on a sack, limping to the locker room. Out for the remainder of the game. Detroit's best defensive player (on a team with a questionable defense) is in the locker room. Hutchinson jumped into the air after sacking Maye and injured his knee when he landed. And all of this in just the first half of the game. LOL
-
Ben Johnson Thread
Halfway through Johnson's 2nd year as HC, he already has 4 more wins than Eberflus did in 3 full seasons. Johnson - 18-8, 1-1 vs Eberflus - 14-32 Johnson has coached in 9 total losses, 6 of the losses were when the defense allowed 27 or more points. The Bears are 3-6 in those types of games in the regular season, and 1-0 in the postseason. The Bears are 15-2 under Johnson in the regular season when the defense allows less than 27, Lions 19-16 in 2025 and 9-3 in the Monsoon Bowl this year. That got me thinking to look back at each loss and see what happened: 2025 - Week 1 - MIN - Ben Johnson's first game as HC. Bears lead 17-6 heading into the 4th Quarter and the defense shits the bed, allowing 21 4th quarter points, McCarthy gets a game ball for 143 passing yards. Bears lose by 3. As much as you want the offense to score more, 24 pts against Flores in Week 1 is pretty good. This one was on the defense. 2025 - Week 2 - DET - The Johnson era is off to a terrible start. The Bears get dominated by the Lions. The defense allows 52 points and it could've been more. Bears lose by 31. The biggest loss for Johnson as a coach. Not many teams win when their defense allows 52 pts. 2025 - Week 8 - BAL - Another defensive failure. 30 pts allowed to Tyler Huntley, 14 pts allowed in the 4th quarter. Offense left too many pts on the field, but defense was terrible. Bears lose by 14. Probably the first all-around loss, 16 pts for the offense is not enough, and 30 pts is too much. Full team loss here. 2025 - Week 14 - GB - Bears down 14-3 at half, make it a game, but ultimately the defense can't stop TDs. 3x Explosive TD Passes allowed is the difference. Bears lose by 7. Game was close but with was probably another full-team loss; offense needed a little more and defense needed to be a little tighter. 2025 - Week 17 - SF - Highly competitive game, but the Bears defense allowed 6 TDs and lost by 4. This was a defensive loss. 2025 - Week 18 - DET - At the time, it felt like the Bears backed into the playoffs and Division with 2 straight losses. Compared to the previous game against DET, this one was closer, but the defense couldn't make a stop and DET got the walk-off FG to win by 3. Offense only scoring 16 was the difference; this was an offensive loss. ----------------------------------------------- 2025 - Divisional Round - LAR - To think the Bears had the ball on the LAR 48 after LAR possessed the ball in OT, and they lost the game is still a tough pill to swallow. Too many turnovers, Moore giving piss poor effort. The defense held the LAR juggernaut offense to 17 in regulation and 20 in OT with LAR getting 2 possessions in OT. So thru Johnson's first season, 7 total losses, it felt like 2 full team losses (BAL and GB), 3 losses by the defense, and 2 losses by the offense. However, one theme about 2025 was the officiating; the Bears were on the wrong side of a ton of calls, but they were not good enough to overcome them. ----------------------------------------------- 2026 - Week 2 - MIN - In a literal monsoon, Swift fumbles at the one, Caleb gets hurt, Santos has a FG blocked, and Bagent can't do anything; Bears lose by 6. This is one of those throwaway games. Reminds me of Fields/Eberflus beating SF in the monsoon in Week 1, then the Bears went 2-14 the rest of the way. 2026 - Week 5 - GB - No Caleb, no Sweat, no Gordon, no Monangai. Simmons not on the team yet. Still would've liked a better effort from the defense; 2x 40+ Yard TD Passes to Watson is unacceptable. Lost by 24, second-biggest loss for Johnson. Would definitely want both sides of the ball to be better, but hard to gauge the offense without Caleb+Monangai, and the defense without Sweat+Gordon, and no Simmons yet. How many teams win when you have 4-5 of your top 10 guys out, on the road? Very few. Year 2 feels completely different, the Bears two losses have had external factors directly impact the games, and now they are not letting bad officiating beat them. The worst loss in terms of opponent record was losing to the then 2-5 Ravens who finished the season 8-9. Every other loss for Johnson has been to a winning team.
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
It feels like Simmons negates any benefit Cousins provides. With it being Week 18, there is a chance that Bryant is playing by then as well. I still think the monsoon game was completely weather-related.
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
I wonder if Minny having Cousins back will be a factor?
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
That first MIN game was so fluky. Swift fumbled on the 1-yd line. Caleb got hurt, then Santos has his FG blocked, and even after all of that, they had 3 plays from the 12 to win it and Bagent shit the bed. I know the result is the result, but that was at least 10 pts off the board, if not more. For the next matchup, the Bears will have Simmons who would cancel out any benefit from Cousins. So it feels like the Bears will have the edge in Week 18. Not that you mentioned it, but in the other loss against GB, the Bears were without Caleb, Monangai, and Sweat, and obviously didn't have Simmons yet. Can you imagine how Cincy would look without Burrow and Lawrence? They probably wouldn't win a single game. The Bradbury thing will be interesting to watch. I think it will come down to if Caleb is comfortable with Jones or Bradbury more.
Yesterday
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
I feel like winning the division comes down to getting our running game going. Minnesota will likely play us the same way they did the first game maybe with some tweaks. To beat them we must be able to run the ball or all that LOS stuff plays into their hands. To win the LOS I think we need to see Logan Jones on the field since he's stronger, quicker, and faster. Bradbury is getting beat too often and inside pressure is not good for either running game nor passing. I've seen some videos of pundits saying we should stick with the veteran because he makes the right calls. Jones is 25 and was coached well at Iowa and now has half a season to learn. In his limited snaps he played well enough to see the future and I think his skillset fits better with the blocking schemes we were doing last year with Dalman that gave us more creativity in the running game. While I understand not wanting to throw him out there against the top defenses in the NFL, especially Seattle on the road, things are different going forward. I don't look at it like what is the best option on the next game or two rather what gives us the best chance to win games in the playoffs. That answer IMO is Jones if we can get him some good game experience before the playoffs. RIght now is the perfect start going against NO and if we don't do it now then it's not likely we will anytime afterward. I also don't think the sky will fall down if we reverted back to Bradbury if Jones struggles.
-
New Stadium Proposal
I would love for them to stay in city in a new state of the art facility!
-
Week 10 Bye Week Open Thread
Week 10 - What to Watch MIN @ GB (MIN/GB - Division + Wild Card + Upcoming Opponents) Biggest game of the week for the Bears. GB favored by 3 at home. Cousins back for MIN. I am leaning towards wanting MIN to win, since GB still has Parsons coming back so they need to stack some losses before that occurs. NE @ DET (DET - Division + Wild Card + Upcoming Opponent) Detroit only favored by 2.5 but Pats defense looked terrible last week against GB. SF @ DAL (SF - Conference Bye, DAL - Wild Card) SF favored on the road by 4.5. A DAL win would be massive for the potential #1 seed. CAR @ NO (Wild Card + Next Opponent) NO is the next opponent, and the winner could be the South Division Winner. SEA @ LVR (SEA - Wild Card) With Cousins going to MIN, hard to see LVR winning this one. LAR @ ARZ (LAR - Wild Card) LAR is hit hard with injuries, but ARZ is also thin and injured (Wilson out for season).
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
Simmons = force multiplier
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
The analytics I've heard so far backup the trade value. I don't have the details so allow me to paraphrase (and don't quote me). Clay Harbor has been on the air saying that our blitz rate dropped from over 40% to 22%. Meanwhile our pressure rate remained the same at 38%. Jaylon Johnson had a QBR against of 120 or 130...as Clay put it, he gave every QB we faced their best game. In the last two games he's down to ~40-50. Yards per pass was ~13 now down to about 4. That's not just pressure on the QBs it's also giving Jaylon help with more bodies in coverage. It just goes on and on... Booker and Sweat have about the same amount of pressures/sacks each in the last two games as they had in the first 7 games.
Last week
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
Simmons may be the best non-QB on the team, instant All-Pro in the prime of his career. Still wild that we got him.
-
New Stadium Proposal
Speaking as a non-resident, it was years I’d been to Chicago until the recent game here a few months ago. And man it’s nice with the stadium along the waterfront and all the surrounding amenities (museums, navy pier, downtown access etc). From first blush on this new proposal I like it for the relative similarity in locale. Although I like the Arlington Heights location only because it keeps them sorta in Chicago, this is ‘more better’. But again I’m speaking not as a resident and don’t know all the intricacies of politics etc involved.
-
Blue Chips...
This interaction is goofy to decipher, but has some mental gymnastics. It may have unlocked Montez Sweat on a play to play basis. https://www.facebook.com/share/r/19g31XU2ms/
-
New Stadium Proposal
I don't think the Bears want to play in another public owned stadium as this mentions. It is sad they cannot build their own on the lakefront, such a wonderful location for them.
-
New Stadium Proposal
Heavy.com had an article describing a new stadium proposal, one I love the sound of, and I would think the Bears' ownership would jump all over it. A $10 billion proposal includes a 75,000-seat domed stadium engineered for the Bears but also allowing use for concerts, the Final Four, the Super Bowl, etc. Has the commercial and entertainment districts surrounding it. Includes a developer offer to buy back the property the Bears own in Arlington Heights. The best part is it would remain within Chicago City Limits! Details: Bears Bronzeville Stadium Proposal Unveils $10B Plan With Arlington Heights Twist
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
Simmons mic'd up... double teamed, and once was triple teamed yet still making plays. He picks up details like Akeem Hicks used to do when he calls out the OG who is going to pull.
-
Blue Chips...
Yep, thought the same tjhing when I saw it. It's rare man who can do that stuff to a 300lb Olinemen.