Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Just trading DJ and Edmunds alone would increase our cap by $31M If you trade sweat, thats another $17M of cap space and another 3rd round pick. If you trade Jaylon Johnson, thats another $6.5M and probably at least a 2nd round pick. We'd get another $10M each if we could trade Dayo and/or Garrett, but i dont imagine we would have any takers, and the benefit of cutting them is much smaller. Kmet would get us another $8M, but i feel like he might just be a little overpriced. If they want to keep him, that works too. I think hes a little expensive, hes been a decent TE2, and usually those dont get paid $11.6M. It could go either way. If you could get a 2nd rounder for him, i think you do it. So you can trade DJ, Edmunds, Sweat and JJ for $54.5M in cap space and a 2nd, two 3rds and a 4th. I would do all of that, pick up a big name edge rusher like Crosby or Garrett, and draft DL. Add in Booker, Shemar Turner and Dexter at nose, and you might have the makings of a plan. We would need help at 3T, LB, CB and S but we'd have room and picks for that. It's a bold move, cleaning house like that, but I think thats exactly the kind of thing Johnson will want to do.
  3. Today
  4. If there's a chance to bring in Crosby in a trade, I'd consider to free up the money.
  5. I laughed at Detroit for drafting Gibbs and then that ILB a few years ago round 1, so I get it. But would you rather have Gibbs or Swift if you had a choice? Its Gibbs for me, but no I wouldn't want to use a 1st, but a 3rd I can live with. The Bears oline was rebuilt, looked great except for Ozzys injury and now being out for most of the year. If Johnson sees a RB that would pair well with Monongai, I wouldnt be surprised if that happens. Swift will stick around next season but they will invest in another sooner than later to have a #1 guy by 2027. .
  6. Yesterday
  7. jason

    Bears Free Agents

    Like always, I’m opposed to a RB with just about any day 1 pick, and most day 2 picks. Build the OL - as we have seen - and late round RBs can excel. Besides, RBs are not a real need at this point, they age like milk in the sun, and there are bigger holes to fill.
  8. jason

    Keon Coleman

    Respectfully disagree. He can obviously win jump balls, knows how to find soft spots in the zone, can fight through contested catches, excels at the back should reception, has very sure hands, and is difficult to tackle. He reminds me in many ways of Brandon Marshall. Watch this and tell me you don’t see talent.
  9. Mongo3451

    Keon Coleman

    I thought of this today watching Brandon Cooks talk about him on GMFB. The owner pretty much punked him out. He's made plays, but it looks like his mentality isn't there yet. Cooks said he's a great young man that is still learning how to be a professional. Maybe year three and life lessons will do the trick...
  10. This past week, when Mike Tomlin resigned from being head coach of the Steelers, some professional race hustler and national commentator accused the Steelers of being a racist organization. So, um, the owners are the Rooneys, famous for creating the Rooney rule? So definitely not racist. In fact all these teams want to win and make money more than they care about ANYTHING else, especially race. I think the some people in this national discussion have good motives, and some have bad ones. But all in all the idea that the NFL is racist is laughable. Certainly there are racist people in this world, but I wonder if creating special categories for people based on race doesnt do more to feed the race baiters such as the commentator I mentioned than it does to solve anything with good people of all races. I feel the same about DEI. Racism sucks. Race baiters suck. I dont think the NFL is racist, but I think because of their willingness to bow to some of these demands, it just invites more accusations of racism by those who arent concerned with fairness, but just want to make political points. And then there is the question of how Black is someone? If they have one Black parent is that enough? What about a single Black grandparent? People like Hitler and the KKK were asking those same questions. This is a farce. But all that said, if some stupidity gets us two 3rd round picks, then Ill take them.
  11. Maybe he’s just not as good as the others? Maybe not the best at relaying his ideas, his plans, the future of prospective organizations? Who knows? From his first year as a scout in 2013 to being even considered for GM jobs seems like a fairly meteoric rise. These are billions of dollars being discussed with NFL organizations. Do you really believe they care more about the racial percentage of someone in a GM role when 75% of their players are black and there are billions of dollars on the line?
  12. AZ54

    Keon Coleman

    He’s not any good. It’s just as soon roll with a draft pick
  13. jason

    Keon Coleman

    I don’t how the specifics would work, but given the disparity in contracts, maybe the Bears should call Buffalo and talk to them about a DJ Moore for Keon Coleman trade. That would get DJ’s primary money off the Bears, remove an issue (for those who believe it to be), and do the same for the Bills. I could see how both sides may view this as win-win. Thoughts on this?
  14. AZ54

    Pick #25

    There is far too much over analysis of the DJ Moore situation focused on one or two plays. Everyone saw the pouty guy last year. New coaches come in and the first thing they tell him is to clean up his body language and effort. Every player was told to improve effort. Luther Burden too. Big plays, toughness, good hands… there are plenty of positives DJ brings to our team. Players may take routes off when it’s not their turn. I don’t like that. What I despise is when you make a mistake or see the mistake on the throw and you quit hustling and just let the safety get the INT uncontested. Personally I don’t have that give up gene in me and I’d have been diving on top of the DB to break up the pass. Personal quibbles aside this is purely a roster construction decision for me. The WR group will be better with DJ next year but if another option presents itself where the Bears overall are better without him then do it.
  15. X2. 16 Mil for the D, plus a pick. Cut Edmunds to get money and get better without another transaction.(Sarcasm for the sensitive)
  16. Excellent example of what can happen when you don’t quit.
  17. 😭😭😭Buh bye, cave boy. BTW, how's your Unabomber diatribe digesting with the NFL...🤣
  18. ahhhh, the troll calling someone else the troll. guess it's just for fun? just you joking? whatever dude. take your ball and go home. i'm done with you.
  19. are you really this stupid? end of discussion. a waste of time talking to an idiot.
  20. Oh now you want to get chippy? I did my job last year pointing it out, troll. Now, back to your cave and do your homework! Easy for you, you only have to search this site...🤌🏽🤌🏽🤌🏽
  21. how bout YOU doing the work you are relying on as FACT. how bout YOU back up your mouth with facts and compare what your OPINIONS regard as the ultimate truth. i personally don't give a shite. you bring up these statements as facts like there is no other player on our roster to be used for comparrison who does this or this is the reason that his tenure in chicago is no big loss. do YOUR job and do an accurate assessment of our receiving corp and player comparisons. if he is the only player on our entire roster who takes plays off so be it. just show me or shut the F up.
  22. ...A token black? I don't like it one bit, if so. It's not cool to jerk someone around. It's also rekindles racial distrust. Thoughts...
  23. How bout you do the damn work. I watched the games and remember. I'm not a a DJ hater, nor is he a whipping boy. (Terrible term). His value, at this point, is better served by helping with the the cap and the defense. His heroic catches, minus the one he could have had, can be replaced. That can't be said for defensive help. I saw him walk off the field during a play last year when Caleb was looking for help. (Same side of field). I saw multiple plays of shitty body language.(Number one to rookie. Come in rookie). He also doesn't really see the open spots in the throwing lane very well. (As seen in multiple games). There's your number one. Back it up instead of running your keyboard with a new thread. Don't call us out for NOT doing the homework when you haven't done it.(Goes for Stinger too. Sorry brother)
  24. We have five other people that can make that catch.
  25. ok, i have made my opinions on keeping moore in past threads. i don't have the time or resources to go through a 3 year span of his games in chicago but if this is the argument that he quits on plays or is too expensive then someone needs to do the 'receivers' comparison to realistically back up your opinions or they are just a knee jerk reaction. 1. MONEY: this is nearly a mute point with me. good franchises find ways to keep their systems working under the cap every single year. added to this is on every good roster there is at least one high paid receiver. the other 'replacement' receivers are ALL on rookie contracts. our QB is still on his rookie contract. our RB's are low cap hits. so is the savings really that drastic that we replace him? with what? the cap balance is in place for the next 1-2 years. this is how it's done. 2. HEALTH: as i stated in the past, he is tougher than nails. can you guess how many games he has missed since his time in chicago? "0" games missed in THREE YEARS. in his entire career there are only TWO games he has not played in. those were his second and third year in carolina. that makes him a CONSISTENT weapon EVERY game for a qb to count on. he has been battered and bruised and still comes out and plays to a high degree. back injuries, which if anyone knows about them, is no small deal. groin injuries that he was hospitalized after the game in washington, knee injuries plus in my opinion possible concussion from the head slams twice in a row and probably a lot more i didn't list. every one of these would contribute to onfield problems and endurance. so yea, he may take some plays off that supposedly aren't coming to him. i wonder why with all the injuries i listed above? if he screwed up that particular play so be it. a learning experience or just a result of injury conserving himself for a play designed in his direction. now for all you stat monsters out there.... give me the printout of the replacement receivers game logs. we are basically talking about dunze and burden correct? none other come to mind. odunze: missed FIVE GAMES in his 2nd season. foot injury. burden: missed TWO regular season games and limited in some others. concussion, ankle injury, quad injury. have ANY of these receivers proven they can play an entire season yet let alone at a high level? potential? yea, but not proven in the real world. 3. PRODUCTION: face it, he is a clutch receiver when the chips are down. he has good+ hands. can get open on a regular basis. he is a very good WR blocker. he can be used as a RB on sweeps. in other words he can do everything you hope a WR can do and does it well. is he perfect? no. find me ANY WR in the history of the NFL that is perfect every play, every game, every season of their career. to keep him for 1-2 years more while the other receivers and qb are on rookie contracts shouldn't even be a chore to figure out. be fair, go through the game films. did these other players EVER take plays off or slow down on routes where the ball wasn't regulated in their wheelhouse? let me know how those film studies turn out then we can talk turkey. please post your results of indepth analysis of our replacements consistant, never take a play off, results.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...