Pixote

My oh My I am in love again. I just saw G Sayers on NFL Total Access.......... Alright, get your mind out of the gutter......... I love the coat he is wearing. I do not think I have seen the Bears coat he is wearing before. I have seen similar ones, of course, but not the exact version he is wearing. Does anyone know where it might be available for purchase (assuming you saw Sayers on the show before the game tonight)? I am too lazy to go surfing the net.

The picksheet for Week 15 is Ready! Remember - Thursday game alert! Good luck with your picks! http://www.talkbears.com/Contests/index.htm

Congratulations to flea for taking first place and to Gakman23 for a close second! Great job guys!

I agree, and although we might not be able to get a #1 in FA, we can still upgrade over the crap we currently are fielding at WR. With good TEs & a kick butt RB we can still be effective on Offense if we can upgrade our OL and address holes in our D.

Damn, if he is a RFA forget it, he is good enough to get the franchise tag. He has become Brees' favorite WR target and like I said before NOS would be friggin' idiots to let him walk.

I went to a KFFL article to check out the 2009 FA Class Article and found some interesting names on the list. In regards to free agent WRs that might be available (some may have already signed extensions since this article was put up or may sign before the FA period begins): TJH from CIN I think is a true #1 WR who could start as a #1 on any team in the NFL. However, I am sure he will be well sought after and very expensive. I wonder if the Bears would persue him? Bobby Engram is obviously near the end of his career but is still a great possession WR on 3rd down situations. J. Gaffney I think is the sleeper of the bunch. He is buried behind Wes Walker and R Moss so does not get many looks but from what I have seen is an excellent WR. Lance Moore is a kick butt WR with speed but I can not believe NOS would be foolish enough to let him walk. The above 4 are all listed as UFAs and any would be an upgrade for our WR group. Of course there are going to disgruntled WRs who want to be traded but I can not see JA trading away 1st day draft picks for a WR. I just do not think he would take the plunge.

PC had hiccups this morning, LOL. I deleted the multiple copies for you. Take care

Qestion for the board. I have not been following college football this year or the upcoming draft. Who is the Big prospect at FB coming out this year and what round would he projected in? I want to see the Bears upgrade at this position either in FA or the draft but would not consider it a position I would want to burn a high pick on, maybe 4th or 5th round at the earliest, but would prefer a proven FA (will any be available in FA?).

I agree, the big hits in the draft usually come in the first 3 rounds. If we can pick up an additional 3rd rounder we can get a quality "prospect" to fill a hole. It would be great if we can get such a compensation pick. Guess I will be pulling for Berrian to rack up some stats the remaining part of the season, LOL.

LOL, you beat me to it. After reading the post you responded to I was going to say the same thing. He is hardly in a position to be considered an injury risk type of player. I expect big things from Williams next year.

Until I see our OL become dominating I want to see OLmen drafted day one, especially in the first round. I would like to see another OT in round one this year, and WR & OG addressed in rounds 2 & 3. If we add another 3rd rounder via compensation for Berrian, a BIG IF, then best player available coupled with need.

The picksheet for Week 14 is Ready! Remember - Thursday game alert! Good luck with your picks! http://www.talkbears.com/Contests/index.htm

Good job Gary! Yours truly comes in second, with 11 wins, with Gary besting me with 12 correct.

Your writing off all these players already? Williams may still be the answer for us at LOT. I think it is way too early to write off players like Harrison, Steltz, & Bowman. I have been disappointed in Bennett but still too early to tell.

It's possible Orton could be the answer at QB. I also feel Hanie in the near future could develop into an excellent option at QB. I do not feel QB is a high priority at this time. RB & TE are fine. Would not mind seeing a 2nd string RB drafted to back up Forte. However, OL needs a lot of work and WRs, well, we definately need not only a true #1 but a solid #2 as well. I think we have the DTs on our squad already if we had proper coaching / schemes.

When I look at your post by going to edit/full I am not seeing the link to the photo, just the line that would appear under the photo. You might want to try editing the post using the "insert image" link at the top of the editing area and see if your image shows up that way, or just provide me the link and I will give it a shot.

I would definately not trade for a quality WR unless I was confident we had a QB that could get him the ball. In the same regards, why trade for a top shelf QB unless you had the WRs to throw to or a OL to give him time to do so? I would not trade for a killer DE unless I was sure our DTs would provide the push up the middle to allow him to be effective. The problem we are in right now is we have too many question marks to fill unless we go into the FA market and hit it big in the drafts.

Thanks Noots. I know it is not fun writing up these articles when the Bears struggle. We all appreciate the great work you do in breaking down the games for us. I would prefer to read your analysis of the Bears games than any other sports writer out there in print or on the net. There are weeks when your articles do not get many responses but I am sure it is not out of a lack of appreciation but just frustration on the part of the fans trying to sort out why our team is unable to turn the corner and play like we feel they should be capable of.

I agree, Lovie will pull the switch on coaches who do not perform and I will be anxious to see if we get more changes in the upcoming off season. We have too much talent on this team for our defense to be playing like they are. I think changes need to be made on that side of the ball for sure. On offense, I do not know if it matters much unless we get players to surround the cornerstone of our offense which is undoubtedly Forte. We need to solidify QB, WRs, and our OL or we will always be known for mediocre offensive play.

If a teams medical staff evaluates a player before the draft and says he is a safe pick and Angelo selects him does that make the pick a bad selection by Angelo or is he victimized by either bad advice from the teams medical staff or bad luck? I think Dusty has shown promise this year. He just can not stay healthy. I know many will disagree but I think Bradly was a good WR when healthy, not great but better than what we have now, unfortunately he was never able to stay healthy.

Dusty has had a few good games this year and disappeared in others with the rest of the line. I know it is his 3rd year but technically he is a first year player. I think it might be too early to put him on the list. Tank Johnson was becoming a kick ass DLman before he got cut, certainly not because of ability, but because of his off-field problems. I am not sure you can fault Angelo for that. He drafted a talented DT who played well. Bradly was a good WR when healthy, he just never could stay healthy. Again, is this Angelo's fault? The other 7 for sure, just not sure if I would lay the blame on the 3 I listed on Angelo as being players that were not good decisions at the time of the draft. All 3 IMO were good picks that went south for one reason or another. The other 7 were players who never showed the skill sets they were drafted for and were bad picks. Maybe we should start listing Angelo's top 10 BEST selections? He has had as many if not more Good hits as bad ones, IMO.

Unfortunately, I do not think Orton is 100% and will still struggle even against a suspect MIN defense. God I hope I am wrong but I just do not see how we win this game, or even keep it within a TD, in Minny after we barely escaped with a win at home, not because of our offense, but primarily because of our defense, which, despite beating up on a very bad STL team, still seems to be struggling. The thing that aggravates me about our defense is that the players are kick ass players but because the DL is under-performing we are forced to play up in the box to stop the run and therefore can not stop the pass. We make chumps like Gus F look like world beaters. If you can not pressure the QB with the front 4 without bringing up the LBs you can not play a cover 2 and expect to win. Our failure on defense is not the players themselves, I feel it is because they are being forced to run a scheme which we do not have the personnel to run.

Thanks guys, I appreciate the feedback.

I think of the TEs I'd have to go with Visanthe Shiancoe & Stevens. RBs are close. J Lewis has an easier matchup than M Moore but Moore has done fine by me when I have started him in the past. Parker aggravating his knee will put Moore in the field again and he is an excellent pass catcher outlet for Big Ben as well. The Colts (I feel) will blow out CLE and they may have to abandon the run. I would go with Moore in what I see as a tight contest with NEP and Moore getting goal line attempts.

Ok guys, if I win this game week 13 I am in the playoffs in the ESPN league I am playing in. In this league you do NOT get point per reception. I am trying to decide on my WRs. I started T Owens Thursday and he did fine by me, got 15 points. I have Moss slated against PIT. My third RB/WR/Flex is what I am concerned about. My options are: TJH of CIN vs BAL, L Moore of NOS vs TBB, D Hixon NYG vs WAS (Burress is out) and K Walter of HOU vs JAX. I have R Brown of MIA vs STL & M Moore of PIT vs NEP as my RBs I have P Hills DEN, & R Williams MIA but do not see playing either of them in flex. I am also trying to figure out if I start D Brees against TBB or P Rivers against ATL. I am leaning towards Brees as his RB support is weaker and will probably continue to throw more often. However, one could argue Rivers has the better matchup. On Defense I have CHI & BAL and as much as I love CHI and hope they come up big as they did the last time they played MIN (gave up a bunch of points bt still scored big in FF) I think BAL is the safest start against CIN. Anyone want to give me their opinions?