CrackerDog

Maybe. But your boy has to play his way into the spot now. It was his to lose and thus far he's managed to lose it. To a rookie drafted in the 5th round! I hope this fires him up but the quote from Webb in that article something like "I don't know if I'll start" feels like a guy who isn't fired up enough to go out there and bust his ass to win it. Unlike others here, I kinda doubt he gets cut. I do see the numbers game they're pointing to though and it's possible, if he falls out of favor enough, he could end up unemployed. PS. I read that Carimi has been slated for a backup role in Tampa. They don't see him being able to beat out either of their starters. Not a surprise to me but I think someone (can't remember who) mentioned that he'd probably turn into a stud. Not so far.

All well and good until he used the word "Stellar" in reference to Webb. Then I had to say enough was enough. I actually took SCS's side in the whole "Webb is being handed a job" thread because it was clear to me that just because the team didn't announce there was a competition, there had to be one. Or they simply realized they had no other option. Those that were proven wrong, slinked off. One preseason game was enough to send Webb to practice with the second string. I'm starting to like Nerdman and his coaching staff more and more each day.

I could be wrong but this certainly feels like one of those classic cases of "Guy on internet says something silly and then can't back down despite all evidence that he should". I've fallen into that trap myself over the years. I'm old now and I've learn to just say "My bad" and get on with life. As to Webb, it's always been clear he sucked but nothing makes it more evident than the fact that after one preseason game his coaches demoted him to second string behind a 5th round rookie. If that doesn't sink in for SCS, nothing will.

Is Webb your brother or cousin?

I found your statement "but for the last 2 months+ of the regular season he was more than stellar" to be an insult to the intelligence of this board.

I'd like to know when the last time an entire side of an O Line was rookies. I'm sure it happens but I assume it's rare. Hey, at least Cutler will see them coming! LOL! I sure hope they figure something out.

Well, well, well... After all that CRYING and MOANING! LOL! Based on what I saw, he deserved demotion, at least! But I fear we have nothing better. I look forward to seeing Mills play against the other team's starters. Look out CUTLER!

All well said. If I gave the impression I was panicked then that's my bad. I was very disappointed though. There were things to like out there too but unlike many here I expected a little more polish. New offense, yes. But these guys have been together for a while. Sure, there were missing peices out there and no game plan but dink dunk punt wasn't what I expected. Sure, Peppers wasn't playing so maybe I had no right to expect a pass rush but damn, the guys out there are still pros, no? On the positive side, Bears4ever34 said it best, Emery had a good night last night. His guys were solid, some impressive. Still need to hear about our injuries. Those could turn out to be nothing or they could be the big story of the night. Anyone here play long snapper?

Definitely agree on Bostic. He was out there with the big boys and shined. Funny thing is on the long pass to Wilson I'm not even sure Blanchard was throwing to him. But he certainly impressed.

Great. So nobody else was disappointed with what they saw out there. I stand corrected.

Yep. The pick was on Jeffrey unless he was supposed to stop unexpectedly.

Dude, tell me where I'm wrong! They kept Cutler and the starters out there much longer than planned and they produced SQUAT. As I said, it's one PS game but I saw little on O to get excited about.

Looks like the offense we ran with Shane Matthews at QB. Only with more turnovers. Not going to get too down on them after PS Game 1 but this team, on offense, wasn't ready to play tonight. Come on Nerdman, impress me!

Ha. There'll be no acknowledgment of this by either of the two girls who had that hissy fit. PS. Has anyone heard from Jason since?

You make a good a point. It could be a variety of things. Without actually being at camp and being able to analyze each throw, I have no clue whether I should be concerned about his picks or not. In practice. (Think Alan Iverson when you read that last line.) I'm concerned about having a new offense, period. New coaching staffs don't tend to have winning records. And with our line still having question marks on it, yeah, I'm concerned that Nerdman's Flying Circus is going to blow up. Well, that and you have to have a coaching staff truly committed to those plays which I never felt Lovie was. Not sure if it was balls or something else. Historically the play would be called, we'd practically telegraph it, and then it would fail and we wouldn't see anything like it for the rest of the month.

I once wrote, in my early days of being an internet football expert (and Packers Troll) that I'd be happy if their team bus crashed. I'd jump for joy if an asteroid landed on Lambeau, etc. I've grown since then... But I can't help but smile when I read stories like this. Is it wrong?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000022...ofter-last-year It was said in a positive way in that he's saying he so much better this year. The article linked above is pretty good. But in the video in that article, about 1:10 in, they mention that Cutler said "Not everyone on the team has bought into Trestman yet." I'm not sure what the context was but that's horrible if true. Let me know if you've heard discussions about Cutler's comment and what, if anything, explains it.

Technically he was better than average as his teams were above 500 (the average coach is 500) and his D was often in the top level of the league (points). His ST's always excelled as well although that credit may belong to others... Mediocre is an unfair word to apply to Lovie. As to the O, I'm not sure how anyone can blame Smith for having run the offenses he had to run with shitty QB's, in general. I do blame him for his part in choosing the OC's we've had with Cutler at QB but I was pretty excited with the Martz hire when it happened. The lack of depth on the O Line may have been Lovie's fault if he was constantly in Angelo's ear about drafting D. I'm not sure anyone will ever know the level of influence Smith had on JA's picks. Regardless, it was JA's job to ignore Smith if he thought other areas needed attention and let's be honest, the OL was neglected for years under Angelo. He wasn't a great coach on game day. That's fairly clear. But he had his teams ready at all times, they overachieved on many occasions and disappointed a few times too. He's a class guy and I wish him all the best. I thought he deserved another year as I don't recall any HC being fired for a 10-6 season, ever. But, he's gone and I don't feel too bad about it either. What does that tell you? I sure hope Trestman surpasses Lovie in every important category, especially W's. No matter what, the Bears are my team and I'm going to root for their success even if I disagree (in this case mildly) with individual decisions.

I didn't think he deserved to get fired after last season either but I've moved on (as I think you have) and I'm hopeful that the new staff puts a product on the field we can be proud of. Like Lovie's style or not, I think most people thought the team represented the city well and they were proud of their Bears during Lovie's time here. He was a class guy with a few flaws. Flaws that drove some people here crazy. As to "Why did they hire Trestman?" I think you don't get to that question until after they decide to fire Lovie. So that's why it's important in the scheme of things. I've liked his candor thus far, I think the team is responding to him on the practice field, he seems to have a lot of energy... Based on what I've seen so far, I'm mildly impressed. I hope the answer to your question is given on the field, with Wins. That's the only important reason to hire a coach. And as of today, we don't have anything but anecdotal evidence to go by. We'll have a little more next Friday with the real "answers" coming on opening day and thereafter.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000022...red-lovie-smith It was all about Jay.

The more likely case, IMO, is they realize Webb sucks and he needs as much time as possible at ONE spot. They don't want to confuse the poor dumb bastard.

I think anything negative about the Packers is Bears related and belongs on this site! http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1720418...s-training-camp

I'm talking about the overall number of early camp injuries rather than this specific one. Let's hope that doesn't continue and that Bushrod's is minor.

I hope that inspires you to try harder.

Fair enough. And just to be clear, I'm right there with you that everyone needs to compete for their job at all times. My only point is there are different ways of doing it. Ditka grabbed a guy by his jersey, threw him on the ground and told him he sucked and he just lost his job to the #2 guy on the depth chart. That was his way of "announcing" a competition. Modern coaches tend to be a little more discrete about it. :-)