Jump to content

Stinger226

Super Fans
  • Posts

    15,671
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stinger226

  1. Thanks.

     

    The guy to the right of Ditka is Red Grange. The last guy is Bronko Nagurski.

     

    Yes!

    Thats sweet, the only thing missing is a naked cheerleader, but thats just me.

  2. I notice a few names on twitter that probably means crab but worth throwing out there.(slow time until draft)

     

    I seen on a local South Carolina paper that it was mentioned the Bears targeting K. Quarles at DT (he is a 3T type, likely in the second or third round)

     

    Also God forbid, seen Tebow's name mentioned that were looking at(Ugh)--enough said

     

    If trading was a likely scenario,SF is the only team loaded with players and draft picks. So lets say(yes) 14th pick for late 1st-2nd-3rd-4th.

    WHY? SF cut Carlos Rodgers and lost Tarrel Brown in FAgency so they move up to get Gilbert or Dennard

    so here we go(used Draft Tek) full draft list

     

    30th pick-----Jernigan/DT/FSU-------intent on stopping the run this year

    2nd-1--------- Roby/CB/OSU---------a valve and need with Peanut on a one year and Bowman not being resigned

    2nd-2---------Jimmie Ward/FS/NIU--minus 5 lbs less that Earl Thomas, the kid can play

    3rd-1----------C.J.Fiedorowicz/TE/Iowa---with the extra picks we address offense, not addressed in FAgency

    3rd-2----------Kareem Martin/DE/NC----more youth at DE

    4th-1-----------DAT/RB/Oregon----- we add speed at RB and plays slot WR another weapon to our Arsenal

    4th-2-----------Zack Mettenberger/QB/LSU---extra picks lands us a QB

    5th-------------Max Bullough/MLB/MSU---- a troubled player with great upside

    6th-------------Gabe Ikard/OC/OKa------- a center prospect

    6th-------------Brock Vereen/SS/Minn---safety depth

     

    after scanning thru Draft Tek list, seems unrealistic slotting of players.

  3. I remember. That's why I never really thought the concept of him being a #1 WR made sense. Hell, I went to a game and had a sign that told him which way to run because he kept going backwards. Having said that, if the coaches give him a small number of plays, a small number of routes, and simple responsibilities, I think he could be successful. Give him just the corner, post, and fade. If he works OK with those, maybe add a dig or out route. As soon as he starts to obviously have problems, scale it back to the last thing he did well. The key here is to minimize it since he's going to be a #3 at best, and more likely a #4.

    He was great in his day, but lately there has been to many let the balls drop, fair catches. He never was very good with his decision making, just had the pure speed to take one all the way every so often. He is no longer that person. Offense is to over whelming for him. to much thinking and he gets confused, that is just the way it is.

  4. Guys,

     

    I'm going to try to create a photoshop banner for the site...

     

    With that, I was wondering the following questions about our site...

     

    1. When was it estabilshed

    2. Who are all the admins

    Ill get the pic for the banner, you just have to trust me.

  5. I've gotta figure out how to shrink this shit with out making it look a little fuzzy

     

    my sig is an updated one......since everyone (seriously) wants old school I'll probably just end up using mine as my sig I reckon.

    I will gladly find an avatar of worthy status of this blog.

    575764_491674537616676_1748725594_n.jpg

    1535576_697227800299074_1749758684_n.jpg

    1610081_712752662091408_175042865_n.jpg

  6. If it's something they wanna do (I still think they view Young as a starter), they can make it happen. In the first year of Peppers deal his cap hit is only 3.5m, the following year it goes up to to 12m, but they can release him for 7m in savings(5M in dead money). If the Bears think they need him, I'd do something like that.

    they can move Houston to 3 t spot, that would make for an interesting front 4. Young , Houston, Ratliff, Allen

  7. nobody, on vet mins, we can sign as many as we want. It is the top 51 or 53 contracts, so others below that amount would not be counted.

    We need to go out and put a stamp on J. Allen and get him here. Seahawks arent going to pay him big money. give him a 1 year 6 mil and have him grab 10 sacks and everybody would be content with that. We can play with the cap to get that done.

  8. I'm torn. The trades are horrible value, and I hate some of the picks, but some are really good.

     

    First of all, the Bears lose on all three trades trades on the draft value chart.

    The Bears and Chiefs trade ends up being 1100 for 1000.

    The Bears and Niners trade ends up being 760 for 671.2.

    The Bears and Titans trade ends up being 54 for 45.9.

    That's a net loss of 196.9. Horrible.

     

    As far as the draft goes...

    1. Mosley - ILB - Alabama - I get BPA, but drafting a first round LB - arguably the Bears strongest position in terms of talent and depth - is not how this draft should start.

    2. Jernigan - DT - Fl. St. - He would be a steal, for sure, so that's at least a bright spot.

    3. Brooks - S - Fl. St. - For all the picks he acquired, the best he could do to fix the Bears' current #1 issue (i.e. FS) was to get a guy from Florida State (Brooks) who is slow, undersized, has horrible hands, and is a weak hitter?

    3. McGill - CB - Utah - Tall DB who could sit/learn for a year or two. But not that great right now.

    4. Sankey - RB - Washington - I'm typically against a RB in this draft...but this guy collected so many picks that this isn't horrible. And to get the potential #1 RB in the 4th is a solid value.

    4. Martin C - USC - Same as the Sankey pick in terms of value. Many have Martin as the #1 Center.

    5. Reid - DT - Princeton - Hate this pick. Dude's gonna be a bust. 3.5 sacks in the Ivy League? Seriously?

    5. Martin - DE - UNC - Hate this pick. Just about everyone says this guy is very unrefined, lacks burst and skill, and isn't very strong.

    5. Murray - QB - UGA - I like this pick. He has skill and if he recovers from injury he'll prove people wrong.

    6. Jones - WR - ND - Hate this pick. He's the exact WR the Bears don't need. Not a burner, and not very big.

    6. Colvin - CB - OK - Hate this pick. Undisciplined and slow.

    7. Linder - G - Miami - I guess this one isn't horrible, especially for the 7th. But he definitely is not someone the Bears want on the field.

    7. Connor - QB - S.Car. - Hate this pick. Why get a second rookie QB, especially one with such limited upside?

     

    Out of all that, Mosley is probably the only guy that sees the field as a full time player. And it's at a position of abundance. Jernigan definitely makes the rotation. Sankey, Martin, and Murray are good picks for the Bears future. Overall this draft plan would not make me happy at all. And Conte would STILL be starting.

    With that number of picks , I would be picking a lot different if it was my call.

  9. I think Matthews would make this offense unstoppable, but it would hurt the defense. Overall, I don't like this draft, but I think this would be Forte's reaction.

    fortesalivate.jpg

    Martin and Fuller just not enough defense, you almost have to take Mathews with that pick or someone gives you alot of picks for it.

  10. Sorta unrelated to your question but still Bears..... So now that Devin is gone, who changes the banner for the site? I think Brian (?) was asking about this a year or so ago but nothing happened. My thought at the time would be to do something 'old school' with pics of historic players; Butkus, GSH, Payton, Sayers, Luckman...etc

    Payton is my all time favorite player.(probably cause I had season tickets when he played. ) Good player , good man, prankster like me.

  11. I know it's bleacher report, but Matt Miller does deserve a little respect.... He has Mundy as the 26th ranked safety (out if 75)....Wright/Conte didn't even make the list.

     

    I think he's our starting SS and we'll grab our FS in the draft (Unless they surprise us and sign Clemons).

    I like Matt Miller I think he knows his shit and hits right most of the time.

  12. I think this is one of the richest safety drafts in a long time. If we don't take Dix, I like Ward in RD 2-3. The biggest impact we need is at DT, I think we have to take Donald if he's even there.

     

    1 Donald DT

    2 Bucannon SS

    3 Ward FS

    4 Hart DE

    5 Ellis DT

    6 Aikens CB

    6 Best TE

    I would love to get both Ward and Bucannon, but doubt if Ward makes it out of 2 nd round

  13. In this scenario, where we trade down and Donald is still there (That's what the article suggests) I'd probably go with(assuming we get a 2nd rounder for trading down)....

     

    1R- Aaron Donald DT- "A dream for teams looking for a 3T DT" -

    2R- Terrance Brooks or Ed Reynolds FS- Both are said to be good in coverage and that's what we need

    2R- Kareem Martin DE- I'm less pessimistic about Houston/Young than everyone else here, but depth is still a plus to keep everyone fresh

    3R- Charles Sims RB- RB needs to be addressed fairly early IMO, can Forte stay healthy 2 years in a row???

    4R- C.J. Fiedeorowicz TE- After the Rosario sign/cut/sign escapades I get the feeling they're not 100% sold on him. C.J. makes the red zone O deadly.

    5R- Walt Aikens CB- CB with good size who gets to learn under Peanut for a year.

    6R- Jeff Mathews QB- I'd like to think Trestman can get a lot of the Ivy League kid

    6R- Justin Britt OT- Still wanna see Eben brought back, but even with him re signed they can still use an OT prospect.

    Brooks is only 5-8? I would prefer more height at that spot.

  14. I'd take HHCD over Pryor or Bucannon because what the Bears need is not a thumper. The Bears need a true FS who can play centerfield, taking the correct angles, and breaking up passes. That's what HHCD excels in. The Bears don't need two SS's, where one of them just gets put into the FS role.

    Like AZ said he played with an all star team where do you divide how much of an impact not with that team. Dont get me wrong, I think he is a good player, just question his impact. 54 taks-4 PBU-2 inte.

    Pryor- 75 4 3

    Bucannon 114 1 6

    It seems to me they had more of an impact.

  15. Interesting take. It certainly would be nice if they can trade down, still get Donald, AND pick up another 2nd or 3rd rounder. In the end though I think I'd rather have Melton and HHCD/Pryor over Donald and an added 2nd or 3rd rounder.

    I would say that depends on who we get with extra pick and if we move down, who's there. He's gone, so dreaming about him, does us no good.

  16. Jeff Dickerson ‏@ESPNChiBears 53m

    Bears, McManis agree to one-year deal http://es.pn/Nu1xMc

     

     

     

    As a Northwestern fan I'm glad to see him back, think he has the talent to be more than just a ST player. They're 5 deep at CB right now, still wouldn't mind one more added in the mid rounds, perhaps Walt Aikens who the Bears have had a meeting with.

    Just another body, nobody special. Hope he has more but probably just a ST guy.I wonder why were not getting Bowman back. Check that out, I have to go back to work.

  17. With the diminished importance of kick-offs in the NFL these days i think even that might be too high. All told I would offer either vet minimum or up to 1 mil a year with performance escalators such as punt/kick off return average over X number of returns or number of TDs scored to get to the 2-3 mil point. If he can average 16 yards a punt return, 30 yards kick-off return and net 2-3 TDs then he is definitely worth about 3 mil a season.

     

    I think the days of pure returners are over. Unless he can do all 4 phases of special teams then he will quickly end up an afterthought.

    Spot on with your opinion

×
×
  • Create New...