adam

2-pt conversions don't count for stats, even if he caught it, he would have zero receptions.

Thru 13 games it is clear that the roster is too weak to compete. At a minimum, they need a new LT, C, and RG. My assumption is they will keep Jenkins and Wright. I don't think Allen comes back, so they will need a new WR3, which is a need, but more like tier 2. TE2 is also in this group. On defense, they need a true Edge2, DT, CB2, and probably S. That is 9 starters or key contributors. For upgrades, they need to look at RB, LB, and rotational DT. That is 12 new bodies and we would be going into Year 4 of a rebuild. That is unacceptable in my opinion.

Cole Kmet did not have a target yesterday. That is only the 2nd game in his career where he did not receive a single target.

Thru 13 games: 1. Moore - 712, needs 72 per game for 1K 2. Odunze - 585, needs 104 per game for 1K 3. Allen - 471, needs 132 per game for 1K 4. Scott - 0, needs 250 per game for 1K

I have never seen a zone where the LBs are within 5 yards of the LOS but the Safeties are 25 yards downfield leaving a huge hole in the middle of the field. I was surprised Purdy even had an incompletion.

That was one of Caleb's worst games of the season. QBR of 32.5, 3rd lowest of all QBs, only O'Connell and Levis were lower. He is up to 2,746 Passing Yards, 16 TD, and 5 INT thru 13 games. Nix 2,842, 17 TD, 8 INT Daniels 2,819, 15 TD, 6 INT Williams 2,746, 16 TD, 5 INT So all 3 rookies are within 96 passing yards, 2 TDs, and 3 INT. The most alarming thing is his sacks, now up to 56 thru 13 games, a franchise record with 4 games left. The next closest QB in the NFL has 41 sacks (Stroud). So Caleb is on pace for over 70 sacks, which is insane. I would say at least a 1/3 of them are on him at this point.

The team needs to purge itself of whatever has infested the organization. Whether it is weakness, passiveness, being too nice, whatever it is, they need to clean house and start fresh while Caleb is still on his rookie deal. I would fire Poles, the entire coaching staff, and other staffers that have bred this losing culture over the past 3 years. For the roster, I am saving some cap space by cutting or trading Edmunds, Everett, and Bates to free up about $15M. Some dead cap for Edmunds but it would be worth it. I would be open to trading just about anyone on the roster for draft capital. Poles has now built a team that has had 2 losing streaks 7 games or longer. There are teams that have not lost 7 games in that same time frame, but people are defending Poles. This is the 2nd worst team in the NFL over the past 3 years and there is a good chance CAR passes the Bears with 2 more wins in the last 4 weeks to put the Bears at the bottom.

The roster is too weak. If SF could do that to the Bears with 10+ starters injured, then the 3-4 guys the Bears were missing shouldn't have mattered. Their 5th string RB scored a TD on the Bears defense. At the end of Year 3 and the team still needs a DT, Edge, CB, probably another S, and an upgrade at LB. That's 5 on defense. On offense, they need at least 3 on the O-Line at a minimum and a real threat to catch the ball at TE. That is another 5 players without counting depth pieces. There is no way this roster should be that weak after 3 full offseasons.

The way the defense looked, one other thing is apparent. Washington as a coordinator sucks too. Too many guys way out of position.

The Bears won't end up at #9 with 4 more losses. Probably #6 or #7 at this point.

The Bears have the #9 pick, #35 (CAR), and the #41 pick. Assuming they lose out, which looks very probable, they will have 3 picks in the top 40 and 4 in the top 70.

This will probably be the most active thread from here on out. The Bears currently have the 9th pick at 4-9, but CIN has not played yet this week at 4-8. If CIN wins, the Bears stay at 9, if CIN loses the Bears drop to 10th. This next week, JAX 3-10 vs NYJ 3-10, guarantees another 4-win team. 3-win CAR also plays 5-win DAL, and 3-10 TEN plays 4-win CIN. In order for the Bears to get a better pick, we need several of the current 3-win teams to win at least 2 more games. Realistically though, even with the Bears losing out, I don't think they get a pick better than #6, which still requires 3x 3-win teams to win 2 out of the next 4. This is a terrible year to be bad. The Bears could finish with 4 wins, with 11 straight losses and not get a top 5 pick.

His 2nd punter he drafted in 3 years. Great use of draft capital. Auto draft using a big board with BPA picks would've yielded a better team after 3 years.

Poles has to go. The Bears need a clean slate to start fresh with Williams. Someone needs to come in and build inside out, all trenches until they are top 10 units.

Well that game was on Poles. This is the 4-9 team he built in his 3rd year as GM. Edmunds is a terrible and overpaid MLB. Almost every other player is overrated. Braxton Jones is not a starting LT. Wright over Jalen Carter looks worse every day. I am glad he used his first two draft picks on a Nickelback and Safety. That sure is paying dividends. The list goes on and on. He lucked into the CAR trade and that is the only thing saving him from not having the worst team in the NFL in his 3rd year. SF had their 5th string RB score a TD.

Here are the worst records against the top half of the league. It makes sense that most of the bottom feeders are on the list, but I was surprised to see DEN on there. They are 8-0 against bad teams and 0-5 vs good teams. If they make the playoffs, they are the first team eliminated (AFC side). ATL would be the same for the NFC. There is only one team on this list with a losing record AND a positive points differential, the Chicago Bears. You cannot make up how bad this team has been under Flus. JAX 0-8 CIN 0-7 CHI 0-6 MIA 0-5 DEN 0-5 (8-5) NE 0-5 NO 0-4 CAR 0-4 LVR 1-7 NYJ 1-7 SF 1-6 NYG 1-5 ATL 1-5 (6-6) Besides one-score game losses, how about turnover differential? The Bears are 4th in the NFL with a +10. BUF +17 (10-2) PIT +15 (9-3) LAC +11 (8-4) CHI +10 (4-8) HOU +10 (8-5) It is literally near impossible to do what the Bears have done over the past few years. This is in direct relation to the type of coach Flus was and how he performed on the sidelines. He gave away no less than 10 wins in the past 3 years with his ignorance. The silver lining is this team is much better than their record indicates.

Bosa is their top defensive player and Trent Williams is arguably their best player on offense as an elite LT. Both out including no McCaffery or Mason at RB.

Bosa is out for sure:

An interesting note in the rookie QB comparisons. Not only do they not talk about opponents, but they don't even mention things like pressure rate. Of the QBs with at least 10 starts, Bo Nix (27.3%) has the 3rd lowest QBP and Jayden Daniels (29.2%) has the 6th lowest. On the flip side, only 2 QBs with 10 starts have a higher QBP than Williams (37.6%).

Teams ahead of the Bears in the draft order have some favorable matchups in the event that the Bears lose. Both other 4-8 teams have easier opponents with CIN at DAL, and NO at NYG. TEN also plays JAX. So there is a good chance that we 3 teams with another win below the Bears. That would make a Bears loss equal pick #9 and a Bears win equal pick #12 or #13.

In their last two games they have been outscored 73-20 and now they have more players injured.

Trent Williams out, Bosa doubtful. McCaffrey and Mason done for season. After returning from a frozen Buffalo game where they were beat up. This SF team may be mailing it in for the season. We will see, but that team had way loftier goals than the Bears and are only 1 game ahead of the Bears thru 12 games.

I thought Warren literally said in the presser that Poles was the "Point Man" on the HC hire?

He hasn't thrown one since he played us 4 weeks ago. Goff had one though.

Say what you will about Caleb, but straight up game comparison against the same team, same location, and same day of the week as Jordan Love against DET: Love 12-20, 60%, 206 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT, 23 rushing yds Williams 20-39, 51.3%, 256 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT, 39 rushing yds Also, the biggest thing for Love was field position. Campbell was doing everything in his power to give the game to GB. GB had starting field positions of the DET 30 after a turnover on downs, the DET 16 after an INT, and the GB 48. Even with that, Love only put up those numbers. Lastly, his 206 yards includes a 59-yarder to Watson, so he had 147 passing yards the rest of the game besides that one play.