We need to keep Fangio.

 

http://bearswire.usatoday.com/2017/01/21/b...nt-dc-position/

We need to keep Fangio.

 

http://bearswire.usatoday.com/2017/01/21/b...nt-dc-position/

They can not leave unless it is a better job, he is under contract.

Yep, unless he was taking a head coaching gig or something higher than DC (Assistant to the Regional Head Coach), then we will be good to go.

They can not leave unless it is a better job, he is under contract.

 

They can leave if the Bears let them go. Remember the rumor was that Fox and Pace didn't want Fangio back. I would say SF was testing the water on that rumor. With no GM and no HC in place that likely means ownership sent the request, and quite possibly this was something discussed during interviews with Shanahan.

They can leave if the Bears let them go. Remember the rumor was that Fox and Pace didn't want Fangio back. I would say SF was testing the water on that rumor. With no GM and no HC in place that likely means ownership sent the request, and quite possibly this was something discussed during interviews with Shanahan.

I think that maybe a possible disagreement got blown out of proportion, so I do not think they want him to leave and this action proves that.

 

We need to keep Fangio.

 

http://bearswire.usatoday.com/2017/01/21/b...nt-dc-position/

Agree. The interesting thing is, why would Fangio go back to San Fran after he already left them the first time (upset he didn't get the head coaching gig). Either way, glad we are keeping Fangio around.

They can leave if the Bears let them go. Remember the rumor was that Fox and Pace didn't want Fangio back. I would say SF was testing the water on that rumor. With no GM and no HC in place that likely means ownership sent the request, and quite possibly this was something discussed during interviews with Shanahan.

 

good analysis.