Then we follow it up with a bad pick.  nice...

Put a fork in them!

Words can't even come close to describe how much I hate the Packers.  I want to see them get beat bad coming out of their precious first round bye.  I want Rodgers to retire and then to see them suck for eternity.

1 hour ago, Alaskan Grizzly said:

Other than the Kmet (questionable) fumble and Triubiskys near miss at the end of the game, the offense is doing well.  They were playing smart Bears-type ball-control offense.  But with GB being able to do as they please on offense, won’t matter how good the Bears O plays.  
 

Weird to have to be worried about the D playing well.  

Just milking the clock is not enough. I thought they were playing OK, not well. Playing well would be exploiting GB weaknesses and getting large chunks here and there. Playing well is not grinding it out and going for it on fourth down 5 times.

Well the Bears Offense did better then the last game against the packers, but the Defense has no answer how to stop Rogers

Bears get the Saints next week!

Cardinals lost so we are in. Didn’t want it this way but we are in. 
 

Fingers crossed we get Roquan, Jaylon and Buster back next week. 
 

Until the last couple of drives it was close and we could have picked off Rogers twice. 
 

I’m a glass half full person so I’m proud of how we played today. 

6 minutes ago, jason said:

Just milking the clock is not enough. I thought they were playing OK, not well. Playing well would be exploiting GB weaknesses and getting large chunks here and there. Playing well is not grinding it out and going for it on fourth down 5 times.

Relatively speaking yes, what you’re talking about is for an offense that is explosive and can stretch the field. That is not this offense.  For this current type of offense to work with the current players in place you have to play smart and control the clock WITH a complimentary defense that can keep the opponent’s offense out of the end zone.  
 

You see what happens when they get desperate on offense and they can’t control what the other teams offense is doing.  

6 minutes ago, 50england50 said:

Until the last couple of drives it was close and we could have picked off Rogers twice. 
 

I’m a glass half full person so I’m proud of how we played today. 

This 

I saw what I needed to see.  Trubisky doesn't cut it.  Pagano needs to be fired...

47 minutes ago, Mongo3451 said:

I saw what I needed to see.  Trubisky doesn't cut it.  Pagano needs to be fired...

Im confused.  I thought you wanted to sign Trubisky for two more years.  What did you see that was not already shown for the last two years?

16 minutes ago, Bill said:

Im confused.  I thought you wanted to sign Trubisky for two more years.  What did you see that was not already shown for the last two years?

It's the price point.  If he's signed for two years as a placeholder, fine.  Nothing else has changed.  I said all along this would be judgement day.  Rodgers, as great as he is, has only one title.  It wasn't close.

13 minutes ago, Mongo3451 said:

It's the price point.  If he's signed for two years as a placeholder, fine.  Nothing else has changed.  I said all along this would be judgement day.  Rodgers, as great as he is, has only one title.  It wasn't close.

I appreciate your opinion and find it valid lots of time.  But at what placeholder.  Mediocrity?  So sign him and two years later were 8-8.  And we're still stuck with Foles over that time.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            I just don't have enough time left on this earth to do the Mitch thing for another two years just to be back where we are now.   

P. S.  

The whole coaching staff and front office needs to go.  Not going to happen, so two three years from now we will still be debating the same thing.

10 hours ago, Bill said:

I appreciate your opinion and find it valid lots of time.  But at what placeholder.  Mediocrity?  So sign him and two years later were 8-8.  And we're still stuck with Foles over that time.                                                                                  I just don't have enough time left on this earth to do the Mitch thing for another two years just to be back where we are now.   

I get it.  I'm simply tired of the rinse and repeat.  Yes, I want a new QB, but I want OL before we draft him.  Show me a better short term replacement for Mitch and I'll take it.  Now, tell me how you are going to make that happen.