Stinger226 Posted yesterday at 01:46 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 01:46 AM PFF came out with their TEs ranking for 2025. Kmet is ranked 29th. Kincaid 10th Dalton Kincaid 2024 stats: 44 catches of 71 targets./448 yards- 2 TDs/ 2 drops/ 10.2 yards per reception Cole Kmet 2024 stats: 47 of 55 targets/474 yards- 4 TDs / 1 drop/ 10.1 yards per reception Dalton Kincaid 2023 stats: 71 of 93/ 673 yards- 2 TDs / 9.2 yards per reception Cole Kmet 2023 stats: 73 of 90/ 719/ 6 TDs / 9.8 per reception Kincaid had Josh Allen throwing to him. Kmet had Fields and Williams throwing to him. Can someone explain had they graded this with Kmet clearly the better TE? 2 year totals Kincaid 116 of 164 / 1021 yards/ 4 TDs Kmet 120 of 145 / 1193 yards and 10 TDs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted yesterday at 01:52 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 01:52 AM The addition of Coleston Loveland... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted yesterday at 09:37 AM Author Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:37 AM 7 hours ago, Mongo3451 said: The addition of Coleston Loveland... He was ranked 23 . If you look at BJ run offenses, TE is an important position and if we're projecting, wouldnt you have Colston ranked higher than 23 ? Last year LaPorta was ranked 6th. Cole Kmet was ranked 18th, Kincaid was 28th. Last year was a bad year for Kmet due to a dysfuntional offense and rookie QB. Taysom Hill was ranked 15th with 23 reception/ 187 yards/ 6 TDs PFF just puts content out there that is hard to wrap your head around. If you projected a split in the total TE reps, I would say both would land in the midteens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted 18 hours ago Report Share Posted 18 hours ago 6 hours ago, Stinger226 said: He was ranked 23 . If you look at BJ run offenses, TE is an important position and if we're projecting, wouldnt you have Colston ranked higher than 23 ? Last year LaPorta was ranked 6th. Cole Kmet was ranked 18th, Kincaid was 28th. Last year was a bad year for Kmet due to a dysfuntional offense and rookie QB. Taysom Hill was ranked 15th with 23 reception/ 187 yards/ 6 TDs PFF just puts content out there that is hard to wrap your head around. If you projected a split in the total TE reps, I would say both would land in the midteens. The media in general hates Kmet. Even with Loveland, Kmet is still a top 20 TE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted 18 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 18 hours ago 13 minutes ago, adam said: The media in general hates Kmet. Even with Loveland, Kmet is still a top 20 TE. If Caleb is humming both TEs should be 10 to 15 as far as stats. With DJ and Rome running down field, one of the TEs should be open every play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted 18 hours ago Report Share Posted 18 hours ago PFF has Andrews at #4 AND Likely at #9. That is crazy talk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago 4 hours ago, adam said: PFF has Andrews at #4 AND Likely at #9. That is crazy talk. Likely at 9, this is clearly a receiving biased ranking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago PFF is random. People love it because they do a lot of clear rankings and ratings, and they use numbers, so they are fun and easy to understand an compare. But PFF is nonsense. Now, despite my feelings about what I think Cole Kmet really is, *IF* he was to break out and be a great player, then we might be looking at film of the Patriots when they had Gronkowski and Hernandez for ideas. I'm sure there are a lot of ways to use two great TEs, especially with Moore and Odunze on the outside. So I understand the excitement from those that think Kmet has that kind of skill set. Of course, neither one is Gronkowski, especially Loveland being more of a tall and nifty slot receiver, so the same concepts wouldn't map over 1 to 1, but the matchup problems are obvious, and a true dual TE threat is a real problem for defenses. If Loveland could be a Tony Gonzalez type for us, that alone is gonna be great for Caleb and our offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.