ASHKUM BEAR Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 56 minutes ago, AZ54 said: Exactly. These days 1.3m is barely above a practice squad salary. I understand the salary isnt much. It's him taking a roster spot when his only value is his return ability. Id rather have a player that is a 3rd RB or 4th WR, like Burden. If he was above average, sure but not sure he is even there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 27 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: I understand the salary isnt much. It's him taking a roster spot when his only value is his return ability. Id rather have a player that is a 3rd RB or 4th WR, like Burden. If he was above average, sure but not sure he is even there. On that I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixote Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 34 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: I understand the salary isnt much. It's him taking a roster spot when his only value is his return ability. Id rather have a player that is a 3rd RB or 4th WR, like Burden. If he was above average, sure but not sure he is even there. Our special teams blocking on our returns is no better than our tackling when the opposition returns. I can't say I am impressed by either group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 45 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: I understand the salary isnt much. It's him taking a roster spot when his only value is his return ability. Id rather have a player that is a 3rd RB or 4th WR, like Burden. If he was above average, sure but not sure he is even there. yeah, this is definitely the thing, you were right about that, Id like to see Burden (when hes healthy) get a shot. Youre right Duvernay isnt that good - I was just pointing out the money isnt an issue, it is, as you say, about the roster spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted 13 minutes ago Report Share Posted 13 minutes ago Definitely we can do better than Hightower but there is a lot of good coaches in the room that would contribute to helping the STs. Correct me if Im wrong but is most of the STs comprised of LBs, DBs, and a few RBs and WRs? We have had injuries in the DB and LB group that has second stringers who would normally be playing ST starting and now young inexperience players are taking those spots. I think continuity in special teams is just as important as the OL needs it to be. Hightower will not be here next year but if we changed now would that do any good? Why was Daniel Hardy on the onside kick play? Young guy with very little experience. I would think WRs and RBs would be the bulk of players out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.