Wesson44 Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bears | Graham could play safety Comment (0) Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:16:50 -0700 Jeff Dickerson, of ESPN.com, reports Chicago Bears CB Corey Graham could be moved to free safety if CB Nathan Vasher returns to his old form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 Helluva a move. Seriously. Graham reminds me a lot of Tillman. He's listed at 6-0 193, while Peanut's 6-1 198. We always talk about moving Tillman . . . why not Graham? The majority of the talent in the secondary is at the corner position. Two years ago, Trumaine McBride looked ok at CB. We've added Moore. We've talked about moving Bowman to FS. Moving Graham "Fixes" the FS spot and allows for competition at the RCB position. Do it. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bears | Graham could play safety Comment (0) Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:16:50 -0700 Jeff Dickerson, of ESPN.com, reports Chicago Bears CB Corey Graham could be moved to free safety if CB Nathan Vasher returns to his old form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 Helluva a move. Seriously. Graham reminds me a lot of Tillman. He's listed at 6-0 193, while Peanut's 6-1 198. We always talk about moving Tillman . . . why not Graham? The majority of the talent in the secondary is at the corner position. Two years ago, Trumaine McBride looked ok at CB. We've added Moore. We've talked about moving Bowman to FS. Moving Graham "Fixes" the FS spot and allows for competition at the RCB position. Do it. This tells me they may not be impressed with Bowman at safety. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerBear7 Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 This tells me they may not be impressed with Bowman at safety. Peace This tells me they are not putting all their eggs in one baskets: Bowman played one good game and then was lost for the season due to injury. I think this is smart to have more competition for our sore spot on "D" -- FS. I like this idea! Beside Graham is a really physical tackler and seem to do fairly well in coverage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 nor anyone else Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrizzlyBear Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 Well it could also mean Bullocks is not panning out so far and Earl maybe on the way out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defiantgiant Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 I'd be OK with the move, provided that either Vasher or Moore can step up opposite from Tillman. I'm not sure Graham could unseat Bullocks, necessarily, but either Bullocks/Graham or Graham/Bullocks would be better than Bullocks/Bowman. Bowman is just too fragile to be used as a safety - I'm really hoping they move him back to corner. Graham's a better tackler than most of our other corners (aside from Peanut) and might be good enough at it to handle the transition to safety. He'd have to gain at LEAST 10-15 pounds of good weight, though. You just don't see safeties playing under 200 pounds. Ed Reed is the prototypical fast ballhawk-type safety, and even he's at least 200. Really, if Moore can push Vasher and Graham can make the move to FS, I'd be pretty happy with our depth in the secondary. We'd have: Right Corner: Nate Vasher, DJ Moore Free Safety: Josh Bullocks, Corey Graham, Al Afalava Strong Safety: Glenn Earl, Craig Steltz, Kevin Payne (unless he learns to wrap up properly) Left Corner: Peanut Tillman, Zack Bowman Nickel: Danieal Manning Dime: Trumaine McBride ...that's a pretty decent secondary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerBear7 Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 I'd be OK with the move, provided that either Vasher or Moore can step up opposite from Tillman. I'm not sure Graham could unseat Bullocks, necessarily, but either Bullocks/Graham or Graham/Bullocks would be better than Bullocks/Bowman. Bowman is just too fragile to be used as a safety - I'm really hoping they move him back to corner. Graham's a better tackler than most of our other corners (aside from Peanut) and might be good enough at it to handle the transition to safety. He'd have to gain at LEAST 10-15 pounds of good weight, though. You just don't see safeties playing under 200 pounds. Ed Reed is the prototypical fast ballhawk-type safety, and even he's at least 200. Really, if Moore can push Vasher and Graham can make the move to FS, I'd be pretty happy with our depth in the secondary. We'd have: Right Corner: Nate Vasher, DJ Moore Free Safety: Josh Bullocks, Corey Graham, Al Afalava Strong Safety: Glenn Earl, Craig Steltz, Kevin Payne (unless he learns to wrap up properly) Left Corner: Peanut Tillman, Zack Bowman Nickel: Danieal Manning Dime: Trumaine McBride ...that's a pretty decent secondary. The really key will be if we can get more pressue on the QB from our front 4 which automatically will make our secondary better. That is why I am have the Bears address DL early in the draft when the top WR's were off the board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 This tells me they may not be impressed with Bowman at safety. Peace What have we did yet to make a judgement on any of our players? We have to go to camp , before we can start judging players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonej Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 What have we did yet to make a judgement on any of our players? We have to go to camp , before we can start judging players. Great Post! For example at Rams camp the number 2 overall pick Jason Smith drafted as a LOT is penciled in at ROT. With the amount of guaranteed money that this pick will get if he is not protecting Mark Bolger's blind side then they might as well be the Raiders who dropped big coin on their number 2 overall pick who stiil has not assumed the position he was drafted at Robert Gallery lined up at LG when he was the top LOT prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 What have we did yet to make a judgement on any of our players? We have to go to camp , before we can start judging players. Instead of judging the players we don't have, why not judge the players we have? Based on the guys we have, we don't have a free safety. If we think Grahahm can play FS, make the switch. The main problem with Bowman is that our safeties are more likely to get injured. Bowman lasted one game . . . why not switch him and Graham? Bowman can battle it out with Vasher & Moore for the #2 CB spot, and Graham can be the starting FS. I personally like that idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonej Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Instead of judging the players we don't have, why not judge the players we have? Based on the guys we have, we don't have a free safety. If we think Grahahm can play FS, make the switch. The main problem with Bowman is that our safeties are more likely to get injured. Bowman lasted one game . . . why not switch him and Graham? Bowman can battle it out with Vasher & Moore for the #2 CB spot, and Graham can be the starting FS. I personally like that idea. I think Graham is a heckuva CB prospect and filled in very well for the injured Vasher. This would give us to big CB's that both come up and force against the run. I happen to think Vasher may be on the way out if its finacially right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 I find it interesting that this is probably the first positive blurb I've read about Vasher this offseason, the first thing talking about him "returning to form" rather than being on the chopping block. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 I think Graham is a heckuva CB prospect and filled in very well for the injured Vasher. This would give us to big CB's that both come up and force against the run. I happen to think Vasher may be on the way out if its finacially right. That's a heckuva a point about the big safeties. But what you're over-looking is: 1. The gaping hole we've had at safety has not improved. 2. It would cost the Bears 5 million against the cap for next year to cut Vasher. He's been bad, but not nearly bad enough to pay him 5 million to go away. Start Graham at FS and let Vasher & Moore battle it out for the LCB job. That would leave us in pretty good shape IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.