ChileBear Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 Just read on USA Today that the Queens waived Moss. Hope the rest of the team implodes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 Wow, he really was worth that 3rd round pick eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 I'd take him now... You never know what might spark him to play well. He has it in him, he's just not doing it now. I'd roll the dice. But, I'm a gambling man. Wow, he really was worth that 3rd round pick eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearsFan1974 Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 Do you think the Bears would sign him? Do you want him? After all, he is a number one WR that we need. Just throwing that out there..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 Sign that fucker NOW!!!! Of course he's gotta get to us in the waiver list but if he does we could desperately use Moss. We need a #1 guy and we all know Cutler likes to throw it up there. How bout Moss and Aromashodu going up for Cutler's bombs?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChileBear Posted November 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 Sign that fucker NOW!!!! Of course he's gotta get to us in the waiver list but if he does we could desperately use Moss. We need a #1 guy and we all know Cutler likes to throw it up there. How bout Moss and Aromashodu going up for Cutler's bombs?! No. 1, I don't see him getting awarded to us on waivers. There are too many teams with worse reords that are going to want to give him a try. No. 2, another WR that quits on routes? No, I really think we will need to move on with the lot we got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 No. 1, I don't see him getting awarded to us on waivers. There are too many teams with worse reords that are going to want to give him a try. No. 2, another WR that quits on routes? No, I really think we will need to move on with the lot we got. Yeah I don't think he'll get to us either, I think Dallas or St Louis will try to get him.. And Moss would make Martz throw 60 passes instead of 40 which isn't a good thing.. I still would like to have him on the team for the sake of having a #1 receiver and he could also be on a 9 game trial run with us because he's a FA after the year so if he plays well for us he might resign with the Bears, if he doesn't then he won't and we won't be affected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 I'd take him. I want to see what a so called elite Wideout can do in our offense. Plus, we already know Hester is being used less and DA has been ignored so it would be nice to have one big target for Cutler to go to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 I'd take him. I want to see what a so called elite Wideout can do in our offense. Plus, we already know Hester is being used less and DA has been ignored so it would be nice to have one big target for Cutler to go to. Unless he can block a DE who cares Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 Unless he can block a DE who cares This!!! Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daventry Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 We don't need the distraction Moss brings, that press conference he held illustrates an out of control player....let someone else deal with him and let's focus on making the guys we have work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 There is zero risk here. Might as well take a chance on him for the last remaining games of the year and see where we are at at the end of the year. Our problems at the OL aren't going to change this year but adding a Hall of Fame receiver can help Cutler out quite a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daventry Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 There is a great deal of risk in regards to the distraction provided by events such as the press conference that he held after the last game, which I am sure is the reason he was let go. Can you say "out of control."? No way RM gain outweighs the potential loss...bye bye Randy, you should have learned long ago that you are not bigger than the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Anyone who has said, "OMG! We need a #1 WR!" - Here is your chance to speak up. The Bears probably won't get him, but you can't be against the Bears signing him and NOT be a hypocrite. Moss is a #1, perhaps one of the best WRs of all time. Of course, the realistic side to this is that the Bears really don't need a WR. They need an OL. If the OL gets better, then Cutler and the WRs suddenly start looking like superstars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Of course, the realistic side to this is that the Bears really don't need a WR. They need an OL. If the OL gets better, then Cutler and the WRs suddenly start looking like superstars. This. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 I've been clamoring for both...and I say nab Randy if it's possible. And if it all goes down in flames, I eagerly await the new staff. Anyone who has said, "OMG! We need a #1 WR!" - Here is your chance to speak up. The Bears probably won't get him, but you can't be against the Bears signing him and NOT be a hypocrite. Moss is a #1, perhaps one of the best WRs of all time. Of course, the realistic side to this is that the Bears really don't need a WR. They need an OL. If the OL gets better, then Cutler and the WRs suddenly start looking like superstars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Anyone who has said, "OMG! We need a #1 WR!" - Here is your chance to speak up. The Bears probably won't get him, but you can't be against the Bears signing him and NOT be a hypocrite. Moss is a #1, perhaps one of the best WRs of all time. Of course, the realistic side to this is that the Bears really don't need a WR. They need an OL. If the OL gets better, then Cutler and the WRs suddenly start looking like superstars. OK I'll bite. I am one that once said that Chicago needed a #1 WR but that was before I realized how badly they need someone on the OL more. Does that make me a hypocrite? Hardly. Not even contradictory like your post is. Moss is bad news and for what in skills he may still have he loses in leadership. Me thinks Minn saw that too late or why else would they be willing to piss away a third round pick for a player they used for only three weeks? And not only that but risk a Det, GB or even Chicago signing him? So I say no thanks and am glad to see Minn falling apart. At this rate the only real competition in the division is going to be Detroit. DON'T FORGET TO VOTE TOMORROW!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearsFan1974 Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 OK I'll bite. I am one that once said that Chicago needed a #1 WR but that was before I realized how badly they need someone on the OL more. Does that make me a hypocrite? Hardly. Not even contradictory like your post is. Moss is bad news and for what in skills he may still have he loses in leadership. Me thinks Minn saw that too late or why else would they be willing to piss away a third round pick for a player they used for only three weeks? And not only that but risk a Det, GB or even Chicago signing him? So I say no thanks and am glad to see Minn falling apart. At this rate the only real competition in the division is going to be Detroit. DON'T FORGET TO VOTE TOMORROW!!!! Yes Moss is bad news, but we still need a receiver. Yes we need O-Line but we NEED a receiver. I'm not saying we're gonna get the second coming if we sign Moss, but what do you think NE expected when they got him from Oakland after lackluster years? I say it can't hurt because he'll still draw double coverage and that will open up our other receivers. That might open up the running game as well because the pass threat would make teams put in an extra DB...now if only Martz would call a run and do 3-5 step drops on pass plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Yes Moss is bad news, but we still need a receiver. Yes we need O-Line but we NEED a receiver. I'm not saying we're gonna get the second coming if we sign Moss, but what do you think NE expected when they got him from Oakland after lackluster years? I say it can't hurt because he'll still draw double coverage and that will open up our other receivers. That might open up the running game as well because the pass threat would make teams put in an extra DB...now if only Martz would call a run and do 3-5 step drops on pass plays. Like it or not...the phrase "yes we need O-line BUT..." immediately makes me disagree with your post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defiantgiant Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Yeah, I'm with you guys: unless Moss can put on 150 pounds and play tackle, no thanks. Cutler needs a go-to receiver, but Moss isn't the right one. He's pretty much exclusively a deep-ball guy at this stage in his career, and the Bears can't pass-protect long enough for Cutler to air it out, so what's the use? On the other hand, I'm starting to wish they'd made a play for Vincent Jackson, if the price was right. This season, I think Cutler's showing how he needed Brandon Marshall around to bail him out sometimes. A big receiver who fights for the ball should be high on the shopping list in the next draft, right after some o-line help. Here's a thought - does anybody else think there's a chance Moss ends up in Detroit? Scott Linehan's his old coordinator and Nate Burleson's his old teammate. On top of that, they're pretty high up in the waiver order and Burleson has been just adequate as a #2 option when he's not hurt. Moss and Calvin Johnson on the same offense would be a nightmare for other teams' secondaries. Here's hoping he goes to St. Louis or somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearsFan1974 Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Like it or not...the phrase "yes we need O-line BUT..." immediately makes me disagree with your post. Ok call common sense that Moss can't fill 2 needs on our offense, but in reading all the posts and watching the games, we NEED a WR and O-Line. If I'm not mistaken Moss is still a good WR and better than anything Angelo has put together. Yes we need a Line and if there was a viable solution, I would like to think the front office would make a move, just as I would think they would make a play to better our WR core with adding Moss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Logic! Thank you for that post... Our WR's suck. Our OL sucks more. Do you not get a cheap WR just becasue your O Line sucks more? At least doing something about one issue is better than doing nothing about 2 issues... Ok call common sense that Moss can't fill 2 needs on our offense, but in reading all the posts and watching the games, we NEED a WR and O-Line. If I'm not mistaken Moss is still a good WR and better than anything Angelo has put together. Yes we need a Line and if there was a viable solution, I would like to think the front office would make a move, just as I would think they would make a play to better our WR core with adding Moss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daventry Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Logic! Thank you for that post... Our WR's suck. Our OL sucks more. Do you not get a cheap WR just becasue your O Line sucks more? At least doing something about one issue is better than doing nothing about 2 issues... [/quote Again, I would love to get a top-quality WR, but not with the baggage, including work-ethic and distractions, that RM brings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Yes Moss is bad news, but we still need a receiver. Yes we need O-Line but we NEED a receiver. I'm not saying we're gonna get the second coming if we sign Moss, but what do you think NE expected when they got him from Oakland after lackluster years? I say it can't hurt because he'll still draw double coverage and that will open up our other receivers. That might open up the running game as well because the pass threat would make teams put in an extra DB...now if only Martz would call a run and do 3-5 step drops on pass plays. 1. I hope your capitalization was not meant to imply that the Bears NEED a WR more than they need OL help. Because that would be retarded. 2. "I say it can't hurt..." - I disagree. It could potentially hurt the growth of the Bears' young WRs by keeping them on the bench and/or learning from a guy who has a bad attitude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 2. "I say it can't hurt..." - I disagree. It could potentially hurt the growth of the Bears' young WRs by keeping them on the bench and/or learning from a guy who has a bad attitude. This. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.