All Activity
Past hour
-
Trade Rumors
https://bearswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/bears/2026/11/01/bears-tyson-bagent-ravens-nfl-trade-deadline-rumors/92557623007/ I can't see them offering anything more than a Day 3 pick. However, I could see Poles swapping picks. Maybe get a 3rd and give a 5th, not sure that would equate to a 4th Rd pick. It's risky with Caleb still gimpy. Maybe if the long rest this week helped Caleb heal up they'll be more inclined.
Today
-
Trade Rumors
Oh man, last year the pundits had Baltimore winning it all. I would take a 2nd or 3rd for Bagent, he showed his limitations and needs a game to change that, but dont see that opportunity coming.
-
Trade Rumors
I pray you are right, because the only team I would want to see him play for in the NFC North is the Bears. ;-) Which I would think is impossible.
-
Trade Rumors
MIN already has Jones and Mason, and RB is really not their problem, QB is. For GB, it makes more sense, but with the Jacobs stuff up in the air, and the fact that they already traded for Kaleb Johnson, a 2nd trade for a RB would be unprecedented.
-
Trade Rumors
I don't like this (Quotes from Bleacher Nation): I looked up this "McCaffrey-like" package as I couldn't remember the details: (Ask Gemini AI response)
Yesterday
- Trade Rumors
-
Trade Rumors
I'm guessing the hold up is the pick. What's 35 year old, non QB, worth? I'd give a 6 next year or a 5th in 28’.
-
Trade Rumors
Baltimore lost Lamar for the year, and Huntley is also out. Bagent time with Declan? A 2nd for Bagent?
-
Trade Rumors
I’m not giving up more than say a 5th and we get a 6th back or something. If im making a trade I am getting a DB.
-
Trade Rumors
I agree, and was trying to post this earlier before my job got in my way. There is still a lot of noise about Mack returning to the Bears. I didn’t view him as a worthwhile centerpiece to get our D over the top but adding him to a front anchored by Jeffrey Simmons is different. Reportedly Mack wants out of LA and a shot at a Superbowl…don’t know if that’s true of just media speculation. It would make sense for an elite vet in what might be his last season. I’m surprised to see him, at age 35, still handling starter amount of snaps but maybe I shouldn’t be. If this trade were to happen I don’t know how we fit him in under the salary cap so it seems like we might be sending them a player. I don’t see anyone they’d want but I would absolutely trade Sweat for Mack. Since I”m already troling around the AI search: "Khalil Mack played 68% of the Los Angeles Chargers defensive snaps in the 2026 season. This figure represents his snap participation through the first six games of that season, during which he recorded 11 solo tackles and 3 sacks."
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
I agree, but who's gonna stop him haha.
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
I'd like his snap count around what Jarrett is getting. Let's keep him prime for several years...
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
I heard he takes himself out when he needs a break and playsat his high level every snap. We have a difference maker for sure.
-
Trade Rumors
Almost every site I visit for Bears info has strong rumors that we are still trying to get K Mack to add to our defense, even after acquiring Simmons. They say it would cost a late-day 3 pick and about $8 million this year.
-
Bears traded for Simmons, 2x First Rounders, holy shit
I read or saw somewhere that Tenn used Simmons on 90% of defensive snaps. If that’s correct it’s an insane amount of work. I figure this week his snap count will be much lower just because he’s learning the defense but long term DA needs to keep him more in the 70% range. From Brave AI search: "Jeffery Simmons played 86.6% (or 86.7%) of the Tennessee Titans defensive snaps through his first seven games of the 2026 season. This workload is part of a consistent trend, as he has played at least 80% of available defensive snaps in every season since 2020."
-
Week 8 Official Game Thread - CHI @ SEA, Nov 2nd, 7:15PM CDT, MNF, ESPN, CHI +3, O/U 46.5
The Bears have a superior O-Line, skill position group, and the QBs are about as close as they have ever been.
-
Year 2 QB QBR Tracker
The mental gymnastics over Williams is comical at this point.
-
Trade Rumors
Taylor would be bonkers in Johnson's offense. With all the legal stuff going on with Jacobs and the fact that he is actually running worse than the backups they were already playing seems like they may have less patience with the legal stuff. We will see.
-
Year 2 QB QBR Tracker
- Week 8 Official Game Thread - CHI @ SEA, Nov 2nd, 7:15PM CDT, MNF, ESPN, CHI +3, O/U 46.5
Feels like there is a little smoke and mirrors going on with this Seattle team. I watched them play against KC last week but KC just looked bad. There were plenty of open receivers but Mahomes just looked real bad for some reason. They aren’t a bad team. With all their rotational coverages Ben mentioned their rules during his press conference. Much of that you can decipher from film study but I can see where Ben spent some time talking with the former leader of their secondary Coby Bryant. Can we get a couple big plays by using their rules against them? Running against their front will be tough so I think this a game where the pass game has to open up the run.- Trade Rumors
I don't think GB has given up on Jacobs. Jones is injured again (needs to hang it up), and Mason is a far cry from a difference-maker. I know there is no chance in hell it would happen, but could you imagine Taylor lined up behind Caleb?- Trade Rumors
With Jones and Mason in MIN, it feels like RB is a bigger need in GB.- Trade Rumors
Let's hope he doesn't wind up in Minnesota.- Trade Rumors
Late to the party. He's been on the market.Last week
- Trade Rumors
Evidently Jonathan Taylor (Colts RB) just hit the market. Colts having a fire sale? - Week 8 Official Game Thread - CHI @ SEA, Nov 2nd, 7:15PM CDT, MNF, ESPN, CHI +3, O/U 46.5