adam

Lol Win win for Bears

Who knows if this is true, in-division trade?

I am not a fan of the color rush or when they do gradient color changes. I don't mind the second one, but I would have to see it with jerseys to make a final decision.

Now I am seeing news about Watson requesting a trade. So it is game on.

Well, it shows that even over that period, all it takes is one year. Up until this year and even up until the playoffs, Licht had achieved nothing but signing Brady. I am actually surprised he lasted this long. He got to hire 4 coaches. Pace has hired 2. Arians has been on two teams in that period. Who knows if he would still be the coach in Chicago. So Mark's tweet didn't really say anything other than Licht has been with the team since the Bears hired Emery and Arians was hired instead of Trestman (which was a mistake). It wasn't like Licht was some wizard. Once they got Brady, a bunch of players signed for cheap deals to play there.

My reply: The Bucs are 56-88 since 2012, before this season had one winning season (9-7) and zero playoff appearances. Arians is the 4th HC in that time.

I hope we are not. Like I said above, Stafford is the MVP of the Garbage Time League. He has been stat padding for a decade.

Rodgers has as many NFC Championship wins as Rex Grossman. Since Rodgers came into the league, the Packers have as many Super Bowl appearances as the Bears. Rodgers has lost his last 4 NFC Championship title games. This, by definition, is a loser.

Which basically makes the Bears what the Texans are now.

If he goes to the Colts, they are a 10 win team and right on the cusp of the playoffs. I don't think he elevates them any more than Rivers did.

There are some numbers that I have heard about the coverages the Bears played on the backend in 2018 vs 2019 and 2020. Supposedly there was a significant shift away from 2-High or a Cover-2 look. Pagano played more Cover-1 or Cover-3 which restricts Jackson's roaming ability because of his specific responsibilities over the top. I will believe it when I see it because to me it looks like he was playing not to get hurt and there was a distinct difference in his play prior to injury vs after.

Stafford has been the ultimate stat padding and Fantasy Football QB. He put up huge numbers on a losing team, mostly playing from behind and when a lot of teams were in prevent. I am not as high on him as others. To me he was on par with Cutler. He threw a quarter of all his TDs to Megatron. It's not hard to throw for 5k when you throw the ball 700 times. In 2012, he had 4967 yards passing but with only 20 TDs and 17 INTs. He had 727 attempts! That is insane. The year that he had 5k passing yards, he finished 3rd in the league in yards and 10 QBs had 4k. Eli Manning had 4933 yards that year. Would he be better than Foles/Trubisky, absolutely, but I don't know how much and I doubt that difference would be worth the trade value. Just my opinion.

It makes a lot of sense. He would be fairly cheap and could replace Ryan after a year or two.

In other news, Ragone is now the Falcons OC and Jay Rodgers left for LAC.

Very well respected, I don't mind this move at all. He has received a lot of praise from players and coaches.

What do you think? I like the passion, and if Nagy fails to improve the offense, Mike can slide into the HC position easily.

Most of the cap heads are predicting the wildest free agency period ever. It should be fun and interesting. It is almost open season.

It would not be until 2022 because they take into account performance incentives that may kick in during the season. That is how we lost a 6th rounder because of incentives made another player's compensation more than Daniel's in Detroit.

Also, you would have to expect the Bears would be an attractive destination for a free agent if we had Watson.

That's fair, here are the last 3 years of pick 15 and pick 16: #15 Jerry Jeudy, Dwayne Haskins, Kolton Miller #16 AJ Terrell, Brian Burns, Tremaine Edmunds You can't get more average than the two middle picks of the first round over the last 3 years. Again, would you trade those packages for Watson? The answer is hell yeah every time. If you are picking outside of the top 12, the odds of you hitting on a star is low enough to justify the trade for someone of Watson's caliber. As long as we didn't trade the house and only needed to address OL and WR in the draft (after trading for him), we would be an immediate contender.

You trade the contract, so the money goes to the new team. If you cut them, you pay the dead money (all the remaining guaranteed money on the contract).

So you wouldn't trade Gabe Carimi, Shea McClellin, and Kyle Long for Watson? How about Kevin White, Leonard Floyd, and Mitch Trubisky? Also, if you are a good team that makes the playoffs, you would be consistently drafting in the 20s. The #1 pick is worth 3000, the #24 pick is worth 720, so it would take 4x #24's to get the #1 pick. So if you view Watson as a #1 pick value, giving up 3 firsts would be worth it. The 16th pick is worth 1000, so you would have to expect to be drafting in the top 15 to lose out on that trade.

Toney would replace Patterson and be much better as a WR too. I love that pick. I'm ok with Trask that late because if it doesn't work, its not like a trade up to #2 and passing on 2 HoFers. It is hard to see Trask being worse than Trubisky just based on comparing their college tape. Getting OT early is huge. Overall, I like the draft, especially because there are no reaches and only one small school pick.