Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

TalkBears Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Parsons Trade - Mack 2.0

Featured Replies

I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. 

What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons?

I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. 

36 minutes ago, adam said:

I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. 

What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons?

I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. 

I dont think they are trading all that high draft capital to pay a star 30 mil a yr. Poles has maintained good cap situation since getting here and to many holes to fill on both side of the ball. 

3 hours ago, adam said:

I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. 

What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons?

I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. 

No, the Bears need to use their resources to make sure their franchise player has the talent around him to make him flourish.  Once we have an offense capable of playing with the best, we can figure out the defense.  

No way.  This draft is too deep in edge rushers to waste away two top picks and cap space.  

Probably not anymore. We're too far away from contending to be making "go for it" deals right now. Unless I can get McVay, Shanahan, or Stefanski, I'm holding on to those draft picks to rebuild this OL and DL lines.

2 hours ago, Bears4Ever_34 said:

Probably not anymore. We're too far away from contending to be making "go for it" deals right now. Unless I can get McVay, Shanahan, or Stefanski, I'm holding on to those draft picks to rebuild this OL and DL lines.

right. HC, and the lines are our needs.

11 hours ago, adam said:

I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. 

What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons?

I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. 

Absolutely not - they need to fix both lines - but priority 1 has to be the oline.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.