Stinger226 Posted Sunday at 07:16 PM Author Report Share Posted Sunday at 07:16 PM 3 hours ago, Mongo3451 said: I love this! https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16GD6fRagx/ EB is hardcore. They say Ben Johnson has that in him. Anyone know what temperament DA, has ? I love when coaches just say what it is instead of politically correct speak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted Sunday at 09:34 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 09:34 PM 2 hours ago, Stinger226 said: EB is hardcore. They say Ben Johnson has that in him. Anyone know what temperament DA, has ? I love when coaches just say what it is instead of politically correct speak. me too! This is part of what i thought was missing from Eberflus! I like when the coaches yell at the players. They can do it to break them down, but they can do it to build them up too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago Collectively, between Johnson and Allen, they have to be a top 5 play-calling duo for both sides of the ball. Then you add Bieniemy, Randle El, and Harris, and we have some of the best position group coaches as well with a ton of experience either playing and or coaching. HC / Play Caller - Johnson DC - Allen ST - Hightower RB - Bieniemy WR - Randle El DB - Harris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago On 5/10/2025 at 11:01 AM, ASHKUM BEAR said: If Ben Johnson prefers the Laporta type TE and Kmets role is TE 2 or blocking, then I agree with Phoenix that he will be traded sooner than later. But Johnson isn't going to do exactly what he did in Detroit and might find a way to implement both. With the personal they have, they can run so many formations that will defenses won't know how to defend We have heard that one before. Many times on this board. I’ll be from Missouri on this one and say they have to show me before I believe it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 16 minutes ago, jason said: We have heard that one before. Many times on this board. I’ll be from Missouri on this one and say they have to show me before I believe it. I'm on the other side of this one re: Loveland and Kmet, but we are 100% aligned, that I need to see it on the field too. I've read all kinds of stuff over the years and gotten overly excited year after year. I wanna see it on the field. I expect we will, but I need to see it. Youre right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 5 hours ago Kmet has been a productive TE. He had a down year, last year, because of the dysfunction of the offense. Johnson has a creative mind, the more options the better. Playing 12 scheme a lot wouldnt you think 2 catching options at TE is better than one TE playing the inline role? I dont get the disconnect that more options for Caleb is a good thing. Right now they are building an offense, not relplacing players with a new TE or new WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, jason said: We have heard that one before. Many times on this board. I’ll be from Missouri on this one and say they have to show me before I believe it. We all would need to see it, but it worked before. Patriots 2011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 2 WRs and 2 TES had over 90 targets. 58 targets to RBs, and the rest of the WRs 51. I can see that divided more between our 5 biggests weapns and very little for the rest of the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 20 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: We all would need to see it, but it worked before. Patriots 2011 Comparing a rookie and an underused TE, regardless of how talented they are, to the best TE combo in NFL history, is quite a reach IMO. Can it work? Fingers crossed. But I don’t think it’ll be close to that and I think Kmet’s on a countdown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, jason said: We have heard that one before. Many times on this board. I’ll be from Missouri on this one and say they have to show me before I believe it. That is me too - I want to see it in the season . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 34 minutes ago, DABEARSDABOMB said: That is me too - I want to see it in the season . I think at this point we've all been so abused by the Bears, it is wise to want to see it on tape before getting too ahead of ourselves. I really want it, but I need to see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 55 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: We all would need to see it, but it worked before. Patriots 2011 Gronk is the unicorn in the room. He's the greatest inline TE of all time. Loveland can counter that due to him being more talented than Hernandez. It's still hard to offset the GOAT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 53 minutes ago, jason said: Comparing a rookie and an underused TE, regardless of how talented they are, to the best TE combo in NFL history, is quite a reach IMO. Can it work? Fingers crossed. But I don’t think it’ll be close to that and I think Kmet’s on a countdown. The numbers won't be as great as that, but it's the idea of two TEs that can work on the field together. If you replace the receptions on NE going down to Moore, Odunze, Loveland, Kmet and shave some from each of those for Burden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted 25 minutes ago Report Share Posted 25 minutes ago 3 hours ago, ASHKUM BEAR said: The numbers won't be as great as that, but it's the idea of two TEs that can work on the field together. If you replace the receptions on NE going down to Moore, Odunze, Loveland, Kmet and shave some from each of those for Burden. If it was Bowers and Loveland, they'd make it work, and work well. The whole question here really rests on how good Kmet really is. We all have our views, but we will all see him on the field, with Johnson using him correctly. if he balls out, then we will keep him and be fearsome. If he doesnt, hes gone at some point. Those that rate him highly will expect him to play well, and should feel pretty good that he will stay. Those that rate him less well will expect him to play at a mediocre level and feel good that he will be gone. Im in the second group, but I will be very happy to be proven wrong. It's not impossible by any means. Kmet's measurables are really great. So we will see if he can quickly ascend under Johnson's tutelage. He can wake up and take his destiny, but its not easy to do, and his window is probably pretty short. I hope he does it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.