Jump to content

Parsons to Packers ffs


adam

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Stinger226 said:

Actual I never thought of that but playing outdoors in cold weather will affect him. Parsons can get them 15 sacks every year but their success will depend on Love . This does not make them unbeatable. At Dallas they had a high end QB and won but they went no where in the playoffs. A great pass rusher guarantees them nothing especially having to give up a high quality DT.

So the trade off is Van Ness and Clark to Parsons and Wooden. So the overall upgrade is less because you have a downgrade at DT with the upgrade at Edge and backup Edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone was happy we got BJ and all our new coaches. We have not seen one snap of the new season yet. and some people are nervous.  I think our preseason showed us a lot of good things going forward. If you want to say KCs starters are better than our starters, I could have told you that 4 months ago. 

Here is a good discussion by some intelligent people about the trade. David Haugh is annoying so be ready for that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, adam said:

So the trade off is Van Ness and Clark to Parsons and Wooden. So the overall upgrade is less because you have a downgrade at DT with the upgrade at Edge and backup Edge.

According to OTC the Packers will have 35 mil in dead cap money over the next two yrs for Kenny Clark. Plus his salary which I havent found yet for this year. He was making 24 mil, but dont know how the new money applies. 

This is a big risk for GB but if it gets them to the SB , they will be praised for it, if they dont GB fans will be whining for the next 5 yrs. 

https://overthecap.com/micah-parsons-traded-to-the-packers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been trying to call the espn1000 show to blow them some shit.  Everything they are whining about today is wrong.  Jurko took the day off so they lost all common sense. 

First they said the Bears don't have deep enough pockets to pay that huge signing bonus.  Wrong!  The NFL shared a record revenue of 432 million per team last year.  Do they think the Packers have that and we don't. 

Then they start crying about he's going to GB and we should've stopped it be signing him.  That's not how professional franchise work.  Lastly Clark was their best run defender and Parsons will now be their worse.  

Looking back at huge EDGE acquisitions, the only ones that worked were the ones that had established franchise QBs.  Don't make me repeat that.  Favre got Reggie White and Aikman got Charles Haley.  We got Julius Peppers with sexy Rexy and GB just got Parsons with Love.  I hope everyone sees the difference.  We aren't ready because Caleb isn't ready. Until we know if he can play, the the big gambles go to the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...