Yesterday at 08:02 AM1 day comment_233678 How I look at the roster: We need a starting S to play with Bryant. I would say maybe draft two. There are 5 that I judge are scheme friendly; Theinaman -Scott-Kilgore-Stukes-Clark. Several that could be starter quality Mc-Warren-Haulcy-Ramsey- Wheatley Edge rusher, we didn't add anyone here. I think Booker takes a step forward. Dayo comes back. Faulk)scheme fit but no production Parker) could be the pick Messidor) old but very productive Young) could be the pick Lawrence) sleeper bear pick Jacas) my favorite Moore) middle round pick Dennis-Sutton) very possible middle round pick Max Llewellyn) later round pick DT) McDonald) not a scheme fit IMO Woods) scheme fit but not a fanMiller) possible fit Halton) could be the guy Capehart) a low profile maybe Proctor) sleeper pick 8 Sacks 2025Benny) scheme fit Durant) scheme fit These are the 3 biggest needs in my opinion. The 3 first picks go here IMO Of course they could draft a LT, LB, CB, WR, RB or C. What say you Report
Yesterday at 02:57 PM1 day comment_233679 I always look trenches first and move outward. 1st rd - I take the best pass rusher at edge, 3t and/or 1t. If I don't see difference maker there, I look to see if Safety is BPA.Continue this process through 4 rounds. Order of importance, for me, is DL, S, EDGE, LB and OL. Report
23 hours ago23 hr comment_233680 4 hours ago, Mongo3451 said:I always look trenches first and move outward. 1st rd - I take the best pass rusher at edge, 3t and/or 1t. If I don't see difference maker there, I look to see if Safety is BPA.Continue this process through 4 rounds. Order of importance, for me, is DL, S, EDGE, LB and OL.My preferred approach as well except I’d be ok if BPA is a CB Report
20 hours ago20 hr comment_233681 What I want to come out of the draft with and where I think we could get it:Starting-caliber DE - 1st to 2nd round, maybe third if you trade up/down to the beginning of the round and someone is sliding (Derrick Moore?).Starting Safety - 1st to 3rd round, maybe fourth if you trade up/down to the beginning of the round and someone is dropping (Bud Clark?).Guy would could push right away to start at #2 CB - 1st to 3rd roundCenter that could conceivably start next year and/or push Bradbury this year if he struggles - 2nd to 5th round, unless they see Newman as the future at C in which case you maybe need a backup guard in that same rangeWR who dresses and could start in a 3WR set if needed - 2nd to 5th roundAfter that I don't much care. DT makes sense if you think there is a difference maker in the 1st/2nd, but much after that I'd just as soon play the three guys they signed, plus snaps for Shemar Turner there to go with Grady Jackson and Gervon Dexter returning. That seems to me like a solid, if potentially unspectacular, DT group, which is fine doing into a draft that's pretty unspectacular at DT IMO (which I theorize is precisely why they signed those DTs in free agency).OT - I've resigned myself to the fact that OT is a real first round possibility and I'm (grudgingly) OK with it, though I'd still be pretty surprised if it happens. Maybe you take a mid round guy with a lot of LT experience (Markel Bell, Jude Bowry, JC Davis, etc.) to give you one more crack at a LT, but you currently have Jones, Willis, Benedet, and Kiran (I still believe!) to battle for the LT position and you probably aren't going to do much better than that this year outside of the first round (I think that's why they signed Jones and Willis but we shall see).LB depth would be nice if you love a guy (I can't help but think Kyle Louis could be a target) but I'm pretty much good with the depth there.RB - If you like one and see it as a value pick, great, if not, I'm OK with what we have for now.TE - Same as RB. Report
15 hours ago15 hr comment_233682 7 hours ago, AZ54 said:My preferred approach as well except I’d be ok if BPA is a CBAbsolutely, if they are difference maker. I'll even include RB and TE, if they can be utilized as weapons... Report
15 hours ago15 hr comment_233683 15 minutes ago, Mongo3451 said:Absolutely, if they are difference maker. I'll even include RB and TE, if they can be utilized as weapons...That's what I say, get a guy that will be a multiplier. Someone who scores, takes aways scores, or shuts down other teams best. Report
15 hours ago15 hr comment_233684 12 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said:That's what I say, get a guy that will be a multiplier. Someone who scores, takes aways scores, or shuts down other teams best.Amen to that!... Report
14 hours ago14 hr comment_233685 What are your odds round 1 for the 3 options below and no 33.3% Trade upStay putTrade down Report
14 hours ago14 hr comment_233686 23 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said:What are your odds round 1 for the 3 options below and no 33.3%Trade upStay putTrade down5% trade up55% stay put40% trade down Report
3 hours ago3 hr Author comment_233688 6 hours ago, dawhizz said:What I want to come out of the draft with and where I think we could get it:Starting-caliber DE - 1st to 2nd round, maybe third if you trade up/down to the beginning of the round and someone is sliding (Derrick Moore?).Starting Safety - 1st to 3rd round, maybe fourth if you trade up/down to the beginning of the round and someone is dropping (Bud Clark?).Guy would could push right away to start at #2 CB - 1st to 3rd roundCenter that could conceivably start next year and/or push Bradbury this year if he struggles - 2nd to 5th round, unless they see Newman as the future at C in which case you maybe need a backup guard in that same rangeWR who dresses and could start in a 3WR set if needed - 2nd to 5th roundAfter that I don't much care.DT makes sense if you think there is a difference maker in the 1st/2nd, but much after that I'd just as soon play the three guys they signed, plus snaps for Shemar Turner there to go with Grady Jackson and Gervon Dexter returning. That seems to me like a solid, if potentially unspectacular, DT group, which is fine doing into a draft that's pretty unspectacular at DT IMO (which I theorize is precisely why they signed those DTs in free agency).OT - I've resigned myself to the fact that OT is a real first round possibility and I'm (grudgingly) OK with it, though I'd still be pretty surprised if it happens. Maybe you take a mid round guy with a lot of LT experience (Markel Bell, Jude Bowry, JC Davis, etc.) to give you one more crack at a LT, but you currently have Jones, Willis, Benedet, and Kiran (I still believe!) to battle for the LT position and you probably aren't going to do much better than that this year outside of the first round (I think that's why they signed Jones and Willis but we shall see).LB depth would be nice if you love a guy (I can't help but think Kyle Louis could be a target) but I'm pretty much good with the depth there.RB - If you like one and see it as a value pick, great, if not, I'm OK with what we have for now.TE - Same as RB.You worded that much better than I did, totally agree. As far as LT, people talk about Proctor, and Lomu but both those would seem to need time to develop. Now if the top of the draft drops the they may be able to start day one, I get it.The biggest thing I need to do is trust the brass to make the right choices rather I think they're a good player or not. Like the rest of you, I think we need a mulitpler but would we settle for 3 or 4 above average players? A TJ Parker, 6-8 sacks? A S that could start immediately and contribute? A DT that becomes rotational day one? A CB that could grow into a starter in year 2? A future starting OC? 17 hours ago, dawhizz said:What I want to come out of the draft with and where I think we could get it:Starting-caliber DE - 1st to 2nd round, maybe third if you trade up/down to the beginning of the round and someone is sliding (Derrick Moore?).Starting Safety - 1st to 3rd round, maybe fourth if you trade up/down to the beginning of the round and someone is dropping (Bud Clark?).Guy would could push right away to start at #2 CB - 1st to 3rd roundCenter that could conceivably start next year and/or push Bradbury this year if he struggles - 2nd to 5th round, unless they see Newman as the future at C in which case you maybe need a backup guard in that same rangeWR who dresses and could start in a 3WR set if needed - 2nd to 5th roundAfter that I don't much care.DT makes sense if you think there is a difference maker in the 1st/2nd, but much after that I'd just as soon play the three guys they signed, plus snaps for Shemar Turner there to go with Grady Jackson and Gervon Dexter returning. That seems to me like a solid, if potentially unspectacular, DT group, which is fine doing into a draft that's pretty unspectacular at DT IMO (which I theorize is precisely why they signed those DTs in free agency).OT - I've resigned myself to the fact that OT is a real first round possibility and I'm (grudgingly) OK with it, though I'd still be pretty surprised if it happens. Maybe you take a mid round guy with a lot of LT experience (Markel Bell, Jude Bowry, JC Davis, etc.) to give you one more crack at a LT, but you currently have Jones, Willis, Benedet, and Kiran (I still believe!) to battle for the LT position and you probably aren't going to do much better than that this year outside of the first round (I think that's why they signed Jones and Willis but we shall see).LB depth would be nice if you love a guy (I can't help but think Kyle Louis could be a target) but I'm pretty much good with the depth there.RB - If you like one and see it as a value pick, great, if not, I'm OK with what we have for now.TE - Same as RB. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.