March 22, 201313 yr comment_118799 RT @RapSheet: Speaking of the #Bears: They still want to re-sign DE Israel Idonije and are trying to do so. Must fight off the #49ers to make it happen Report
March 22, 201313 yr comment_118801 Gotta think he'll join SF... RT @RapSheet: Speaking of the #Bears: They still want to re-sign DE Israel Idonije and are trying to do so. Must fight off the #49ers to make it happen Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118904 RT @RapSheet: Speaking of the #Bears: They still want to re-sign DE Israel Idonije and are trying to do so. Must fight off the #49ers to make it happen I hope we bring him back. He's been a constant. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118910 I hope we bring him back. He's been a constant. Right now there signing 1 mil players. We paid him 2.5 last, so probably not going to happen.PLUS they got rid of 54, so I'm sure he wouldnt want to play here again. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118912 Gotta think he'll join SF... San Fransisco would be the obvious destination. However, I believe they have 17 picks in the draft. I'm sure they'll trade some but let's say they trade 5 and end up with a net 12 picks - they are not going to have a lot of roster space. I would wonder why a young team like the 49ers would want a player on the other side of 30. Peace Report
March 23, 201313 yr Author comment_118913 San Fransisco would be the obvious destination. However, I believe they have 17 picks in the draft. I'm sure they'll trade some but let's say they trade 5 and end up with a net 12 picks - they are not going to have a lot of roster space. I would wonder why a young team like the 49ers would want a player on the other side of 30. Peace I want to say it's 14 or 15, but I catch your drift. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118917 San Fransisco would be the obvious destination. However, I believe they have 17 picks in the draft. I'm sure they'll trade some but let's say they trade 5 and end up with a net 12 picks - they are not going to have a lot of roster space. I would wonder why a young team like the 49ers would want a player on the other side of 30. Peace You make a good point, plus I do see them trading picks, a good solid roster will maybe have 5 or 6 stick with the team? A lot of trades coming for SF for now and future picks. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118924 You make a good point, plus I do see them trading picks, a good solid roster will maybe have 5 or 6 stick with the team? A lot of trades coming for SF for now and future picks. Let's hope they'd like to move up to #20. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118925 Let's hope they'd like to move up to #20. The 49ers have 14 picks in this draft. I wonder what the trade index would say if we traded our 1 and 2 for their 1st, 2nd pick in rd2 and a 3rd? C'mon chart-meisters give me a stat! Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118926 The 49ers have 14 picks in this draft. I wonder what the trade index would say if we traded our 1 and 2 for their 1st, 2nd pick in rd2 and a 3rd? C'mon chart-meisters give me a stat! For their 2nd 3rd round pick, #94, it works out pretty much even....Bears pick value = 1250 vs SF value 1284. For their 1st 3rd round, #66, the value would be 1250 vs 1420 so it may not work, I'm not sure how wide a margin these types of trades have. Trading our 1st for their 2R #34 & 3R #66 would work out as well 850 v 820. Adding in pick #157 (5R) makes it nearly spot on @ 850 v 848. A mid first for a high 2nd, a high 3rd, and an extra 5th would be pretty nice, esp with our primary need being LG and a guy like Larry Warford more than likely being available at 34. Here's the chart btw.... http://www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.php Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118929 The 49ers have 14 picks in this draft. I wonder what the trade index would say if we traded our 1 and 2 for their 1st, 2nd pick in rd2 and a 3rd? C'mon chart-meisters give me a stat! For our 20 and 50, we could get their 31, 34, 128 (4th), 157 (5th), and one or two of their 7th rounders (they have 4). I am assuming they want to shed some picks and not necessarily make a trade where they only lose one pick. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118931 Here is a new look on draft value: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/...ick-value-chart Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118933 For our 20 and 50, we could get their 31, 34, 128 (4th), 157 (5th), and one or two of their 7th rounders (they have 4). or that lol....SF would be an ideal trade partner with their plethora of picks. Not sure if I'd rather have picks 31 & 34 or picks 34, 50, 66. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118934 Trading our 1st for their 2R #34 & 3R #66 would work out as well 850 v 820. Adding in pick #157 (5R) makes it nearly spot on @ 850 v 848. A mid first for a high 2nd, a high 3rd, and an extra 5th would be pretty nice, esp with our primary need being LG and a guy like Larry Warford more than likely being available at 34. I like this scenario the better, but the Raiders have pick #66, the 49ers don't pick until #74. Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118935 I like this scenario the better, but the Raiders have pick #66, the 49ers don't pick until #74. Whoops, you're right. Add in a 6th rounder as well then....So #20 for 34/74/157/180 would work out and leave us with 3 picks in the top 75 vs on 2 and having to wait all the way till 117. This make me wanna do another mock lol Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118936 I really hope that we can keep Idonije, he has been so solid as a player and what a great spokesman for the Bears! Hope the dollars add up and we keep him on.... Report
March 23, 201313 yr comment_118955 I really hope that we can keep Idonije, he has been so solid as a player and what a great spokesman for the Bears! Hope the dollars add up and we keep him on.... If SF is the only one to compete with I would say we have a good shot. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.