Jump to content

jason

Super Fans
  • Posts

    8,774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Cutlerville, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

4,450 profile views

jason's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Honestly, how can anyone DEFEND the Bears staff or front office when it comes to offense? The Bears haven’t been a feared or creative offense for 30 years or more. Other than a fluke year for crowding and Trestman, it’s been ugly.
  2. Reason this out with me. Poor guy has manual Kia. It drives well. Poor guy sells the Kia to a teenager. Young kid doesn’t like driving manual. Barely drives it. Does that mean the Kia doesn’t drive well? The point is, I don’t know if the Bears can say they made a good move. The only thing certain is that Alshon made a bad one.
  3. It definitely looks different, but we’ve seen many years that were different in the offseason/preseason. Way too many what ifs and optimistic lottery tickets. They have to prove it before I start buying jerseys again.
  4. Disagree. With the Bears, it’s ALWAYS time to question everything. Until they can prove the organization isn’t a perpetual clusterf**k, everything must be questioned.
  5. Which three are you counting? Decker, Ragnow, and Sewell? If so, I’d say you can’t discount Glasgow either. Oh, and BTW, Ratledge is going to a monster in that grouping. They might have an entire OL of mismatch players.
  6. jason

    Sack Reduction

    Well, Kmet definitely won’t get a ton now because there is a 100% certainty that he will be underused in 2025.
  7. jason

    Sack Reduction

    100%. I don’t think he will be a star because there are too many receiving mouths to feed, and the offense hasn’t yet displayed the competency required to creat multiple stars.
  8. Friday NFL games are stupid. Let Friday Night Lights be about High School.
  9. jason

    Sack Reduction

    Bingo. Can’t build the best TE room in NFL history and leave other positions empty. That’s my primary point regarding this situation.
  10. Comparing a rookie and an underused TE, regardless of how talented they are, to the best TE combo in NFL history, is quite a reach IMO. Can it work? Fingers crossed. But I don’t think it’ll be close to that and I think Kmet’s on a countdown.
  11. jason

    Sack Reduction

    Yes, of course, but that’s not the point. Any coach in the league would love to have Kelce, Kittles, and Bowers, but if you have them all then someone, if not two of them, is being used far less than their potential. The point is, when you have a two year old car that runs like a raped ape, but you have it sitting in the garage, you don’t go out and buy another, slightly different model car. Particularly when there is a hole in the roof. You drive the car in the garage and spend that extra money on the roof.
  12. We have heard that one before. Many times on this board. I’ll be from Missouri on this one and say they have to show me before I believe it.
  13. jason

    UDFAs

    You don’t pick up a defensive back if any kind whose last name is “burns.”
  14. jason

    Sack Reduction

    I think that’s realistic, and it confirms what I think the Loveland pick means: they’re wasting Kmet until they cut him.
  15. jason

    Sack Reduction

    Agree. I’d say top ten in the NFL is the goal.
×
×
  • Create New...