Im not diminishing Urlacher or Brown or any other.
Im just saying, if you remove all of Peanut's turnovers, Lovie's record is atrocious. Peanut alone was the difference.
Had we had someone terrible at MLB that would have done it too etc.
Thats the point, Lovie's "success" was so fragile, that you get rid of any ONE of those guys, and he's nothing.
But especially Peanut. You can see the turnover stats more clearly than you can mathematically calculate Urlachers coverage for example.
Urlacher is a HOF LBer. No doubt.
But without Peanut's turnovers alone, Lovie is crap.
You can give Lovie credit for where he put Urlacher in the scheme etc, but Peanut punching out balls was not about Xs and Os or coaching at all.