AZ54

He never played the run very well when he was in his prime why would that be different now when he's also not playing the pass very well? Two moves in the middle of the season likely takes away one strength (Peanut covering the edge and his run support) and creates two weaknesses. Give Peanut and off-season to practice at FS then I'm good with him there. I see no reason to sign Asomugha.

We run a west-coast offense predicated on quick releases. He can do that and I think his arm strength is better than he's given credit for.

Packers were out-coached and out-GM'd (if that's a word). Emery did a far better job setting up our backup QB position while the Packers were playing musical backups all the way up to the beginning of the season. Trestman had his backup more prepared than McCarthy did. I include McCown filling in for Jay against Washington in that assessment. On the other side our Oline, for the first time shutdown their pass rush schemes. Run blocking was hit or miss but overall was effective. Now about fixing our special teams, can we get Toub back?

A QB I watched play last week and was impressed with his ability to throw the ball. He's not mobile and may not have the deep ball arm strength so he might drop a bit in the draft. Yet his abillty to hit receivers in stride in the short to intermediate game is very good. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/nfl-dra...ails-to-deliver

Great win. Saw some good things tonight from several players and many things we must improve upon. SMC...great game.. Make the hustle plays that's where you fit in. Peppers...finally influenced the game throughout. We needed that tonight. Rookie LBs...lot's to learn here....stay in your gap. I still think the future is bright for these guys but the learning curve will be painful. DTs....we really need Ratliff to shore this up. On offense everyone stepped up but game ball goes to McCown. He was really poised throughout the game. My other game ball goes to Marc Trestman. He had a game plan that worked very well.

It is time to settle this down with Steltz. I'll take the slower but surer tackle than all these missed assignments and missed tackles.

He had a great game.

I am assuming this so-called 1yr contract is in fact a contract for 8-12 weeks? Not a bad bet at all and hopefully this not only helps us later this season but if he plays well ideally it helps us to sign him to a new contract. There are no guarantees but surely if we gave him the best offer this year, and if he likes playing for the Bears, he might appreciate that enough to at least give us a chance to meet any offer he gets on the FA market.

Well said. Ask a Cowboys fan how they like their new 1-gap scheme which just happens to be ranked 32nd.

This is a good thing. That article makes it sound as if he is now healthy but likely not in shape to play. Even if he can't help us now he might be a big help in 3-4 weeks. Signing him should mean we can get Wootton back to his natural DE position and SMC back to his backup DE position.

I agree there is probably some truth to this but I also think there is a bigger part where the new guys just don't know how to adapt the defensive calls based on offensive alignment. Briggs can't exactly run around talking to each player just before the snap. As players have said, they need to learn it and execute it.

Lol, I might try it in a few weeks...nah I can't do this. Far from the old days when we did 16 400yd runs at 68sec with 1min of rest. The only good part of that was practice was over in 32 min. For an athlete playing a professional sport the Bears test should be easy.

Why would we do that? Peterson is a great athlete but he is not a great cover corner. Not yet but I think he'll get there. Anyway you're proposing we give up a lot of our draft picks so we can force him to change positions to something he's never done. He's better than our corners but isn't worth giving up that much.

Step into the light Mr. Bostic, it's your time to lead: http://www.chicagobears.com/multimedia/vid...2e-325baf272cba Keep blowing up the FB and shedding OL blocks and he will shine. Just has to learn it in the heat of battle now. I've watched this three times now and that hit on the FB still makes me smile at the thought of what is to come down the road.

I'm not totally surprised by this as the Steelers, then the Saints, and finally the Redskins showed a variety of looks in those games that we had never seen before and assignments were rmissed. I think the eye test we all see is that when they get their assignments correct, which is the vast majority of the time then they can hold their blocks. Long and Mills have played just 7 games, 3 of them against 3-4 defenses. They will get better as will Kromer and Trestman regarding game planning and play calling.

Draft Will Sutton out of ASU to be backup 3 technique, he should be available in 3rd or 4th Rd.

Perhaps you and I are the only ones who saw some of those plays Bostic made in the backfield for a loss. 6 tackles is not a bad way to start his career as a starter. I know it wasn't all good for him, especially early on, but once he sorted out his keys on their running plays he showed up. I'm very optimistic on his future for us. Wootton, playing out of position, impacted quite a few plays although his stat line doesn't reflect that. I even thought McClellin impacted a few plays as well. Cohen and Bass showed up a few times in the backfield as well but none of the Dline play was consistent enough. Peppers is not impacting plays. Even if you don't make a tackle you expect to see him get some penetration to break up a play. DT and DE is going to be a big focus this offseason. I give the Redskins credit for going to a no-huddle offense late in the game when we had two rookies at LB. Without Briggs to get players aligned quickly that was very effective.

I'd sign Cutler to a new mid-level contract, one that is written so we can get out of it easily if need be. Of course that means we'll be paying more per season but so be it. There is no way I want to commit to a rookie running Trestman's complex offense. Then I'm drafting a QB in Rd 1-3 to groom as Jay's replacement. If Jay improves or stays on the path he's been on this first part of the season then no worries as he stays our starter and we've got a solid backup. In general I think we need to go Dline in Rd 1 but if there is a QB there that Trestman believes can be our long term starter then I'm fine if we go get him. If everything goes great and Cutler improves to play at an elite level then there is plenty of precedent for trading your backup QB for another early round draft pick if he has shown some ability.

Has anyone seen Julius Peppers? He was a little bit more active today than the last game but watching the Redskins show no fear in running right at him for the game winning TD, with no need to double team him, says it all IMO. We can criticize all the others but the fact is he's the only one on our Dline getting paid to handle double teams and when teams can block him with one guy then that frees up blockers to get on our LBs. Regardless of cap hit I can't see Emery beginning the overhaul on D (actually continuing the overhaul since he focused on LB this past draft) by keeping Peppers around for this much money. You can easily replace Pepper's contribution on the field for a smaller contract to a vet FA ($2-3mil) and have money left over to address other needs at DT.

For vet min I'd keep him plus I think we'd get a little discount on the salary cap by doing so. When you consider the salary cap discount it's not worth pushing a rookie out there to return kicks IMO. To save special teams $$ I think Weems has to go and I prefer to fill his spot via a rookie or vet FA WR, preferably one with speed to mix in with our giants on the outside but can backfill on special teams as well. It's not that hard to find those guys among FA WRs coming off their rookie contract. Keep Hester back there as primary KR/PR for another season. If Hester demands far more than vet min and can find another team to pay him that then goodbye and good luck to him.

Thayer has some good analysis on our fullback and how he impacted the game. There was some discussion after the Giants game about how ineffective we were on runs up the middle but it was hit and miss. I felt it was worth sharing as it explains why the Giants impacted that with their 8 man fronts even using the 46 Defense at times. http://www.chicagobears.com/multimedia/vid...2d-260208440f47

After watching them on Sunday night the Redskins didn't put up much of a fight on offense or defense. RG III continues to improve his ability to run but he's not reading the field very well right now and he's definitely not taking care of the ball in the pocket. We need to take advantage of that and blitz to make up for our lack of pass rush. I know we'll give up some plays like this but we should be able to get some big plays too. Our defense is not in position to sit back and hope something good happens, we'll have to force it. Our offense on the other hand should be able to find consistent opportunities against the Redskins defense.

The thing is Gould couldn't hit from 50 early in his career, nor could he do kickoffs deep enough to force a touchback. To his credit he worked on improving his leg strength over the years and he has maintained his accuracy. He will still be a Bear next year.

I agree. I think part of the problem is they are having to play too much of a role in run support and that is now their first read instead of the pass. Even so on 3rd and long downs they are often out of position.

How many realize we have lost our top 5 DTs? Granted Paea should be back this next game. Otherwise we have lost: Melton, Collins, Turk McBride in camp, and Sedrick Ellis who quit at the beginning of camp. I keep seeing that Emery did nothing on the Dline this past offseason but he in fact did bring in some talent. None of it was great talent because there was no budget for it but he did what he could reasonably do given our cap space. I can't sit here and say what either Ellis or McBride would be doing on the field but I feel confident they'd be better than UDFA Minter from Montana State. I do like Minter and his potential for the future but right now that's all it is...potential. Emery offered Urlacher $2,000,000 more than any other team in the NFL and he didn't bite. End of story. I'm not sure how he'd improve a pass rush from the front four anyway and he was never that good at shedding blocks to make plays. Given the state of our DTs our MLB always has an OG in his face. We are going to be a bend but (hopefully) don't break too often D all year long. There is no other option and we will likely always see one player have a great game against us as Adam pointed out. We are at a point where we can try to take away something from the other team but our D won't stop everything. I agree that Tucker deserves some of the blame for the lack of discipline. Discipline, not regarding penalties but assignments and sound tackling, we need to see improvement there. I do expect we'll see improvement from players like Cohen and Minter as the season progresses. Not that they'll be great but they will get better at reads on runs and pass rush should improve a bit. Just get in the way a little bit more often would be helpful even if they can't make the tackle. I'm very excited to see Bostic on the field. He adds a lot of energy and his athleticism was immediately apparent. Much like how Long is becoming the energizer for the offense, we need an infusion of energy on D. I know Bostic will make mistakes but he is going to also make some big plays for us. I'm old enough to remember a young Urlacher getting his first few starts at MLB. He wasn't great but he made plays at times that made me say we got something here. My focus now on D is to watch some of these young guys that represent our future and how they improve the rest of the season. Frey Bostic Bass ...who has flashed a few times already Minter ...he's come pretty far as a small school UDFA just on raw talent, can he adjust to the speed of the game? Washington .... freak athleticism hasn't shown up on the field in pass rush. Can he earn some playing time? Speaking of Shea....I agree we should be using him as our wildcard. He can't be an every down DE but I've seen defenses use a guy with his talent to stand up and do a little bit of everything from rush to cover TEs, to drop into zones. Yeah they are called OLB in 3-4 defense but why not mix it in? Get Wootton back to the DE position where he impacted games for us. At this point it seems to me we are creating two or three holes on the dline by using him so often at DT. Shea can't handle that many reps. It is what it is...arguments for bust notwithstanding....just get Shea to spot (less reps) where he can make some plays during the game. He's shown he can do that. Plus Wootton will help on run D from DE far more than he is at DT. At the end of it we're 4-2 and I really didn't think we'd be there. We're still on track to match last year's 10 win season and that's not bad for overhauling the Oline and offense while we all hoped an aging D could hang on for one more year. The Giants arrived at the perfect time for us and we pulled off a win but let's be realistic, despite being 0-6 they are not nearly as bad as the Jaguars. In fact I wouldn't even put them in the bottom 5 teams in the league. Now we have one game in 25 days so we can work on sorting out some of these issues with the middle of our defense and our pass rush before we get back to a couple division games. Yeah, my kool-aid has a little kick to it... and now it's time to finish my beer and get some sleep.