jason

It definitely looks different, but we’ve seen many years that were different in the offseason/preseason. Way too many what ifs and optimistic lottery tickets. They have to prove it before I start buying jerseys again.

Disagree. With the Bears, it’s ALWAYS time to question everything. Until they can prove the organization isn’t a perpetual clusterf**k, everything must be questioned.

Which three are you counting? Decker, Ragnow, and Sewell? If so, I’d say you can’t discount Glasgow either. Oh, and BTW, Ratledge is going to a monster in that grouping. They might have an entire OL of mismatch players.

Well, Kmet definitely won’t get a ton now because there is a 100% certainty that he will be underused in 2025.

100%. I don’t think he will be a star because there are too many receiving mouths to feed, and the offense hasn’t yet displayed the competency required to creat multiple stars.

Friday NFL games are stupid. Let Friday Night Lights be about High School.

Bingo. Can’t build the best TE room in NFL history and leave other positions empty. That’s my primary point regarding this situation.

Comparing a rookie and an underused TE, regardless of how talented they are, to the best TE combo in NFL history, is quite a reach IMO. Can it work? Fingers crossed. But I don’t think it’ll be close to that and I think Kmet’s on a countdown.

Yes, of course, but that’s not the point. Any coach in the league would love to have Kelce, Kittles, and Bowers, but if you have them all then someone, if not two of them, is being used far less than their potential. The point is, when you have a two year old car that runs like a raped ape, but you have it sitting in the garage, you don’t go out and buy another, slightly different model car. Particularly when there is a hole in the roof. You drive the car in the garage and spend that extra money on the roof.

We have heard that one before. Many times on this board. I’ll be from Missouri on this one and say they have to show me before I believe it.

You don’t pick up a defensive back if any kind whose last name is “burns.”

I think that’s realistic, and it confirms what I think the Loveland pick means: they’re wasting Kmet until they cut him.

Agree. I’d say top ten in the NFL is the goal.

Correct. Which is also why drafting Loveland was a bad move. Like I said before, like the player but hate the pick.

120 receptions from the TEs? C’mon now. I appreciate optimism since I’m not a very optimistic guy, but that’s insanity. All three Lions TEs didn’t get 75 last year.