jason

Depends on where you read. Top 10 - http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2015/1/31/794...on-scherff-iowa Early 1st? - http://fanspeak.com/nfldraft/2015/03/04/br...couting-report/ Top 20 - http://walterfootball.com/scoutingreport2015bscherff.php Late 1st? - http://withthefirstpick.com/2015/01/31/bra...uting-report/4/

I don't care how it happens. Move him inside and keep Long where he is, or flip-flop, but these two together would dominate. He is NASTY, and plays with a serious mean streak. Completely rag-dolls opponents.

I still think Landon Collins' is a FS candidate, and at worst he becomes an all-pro SS in a few years.

I don't think it's that clear cut. The Bears lost Marshall, but they added Royal. Not the same player, but the Royal-Jeffery combo looks more like what Fox has had before. As we get closer and closer to the draft, I think more and more that the Bears should select the safety Collins out of Alabama. 1. Rolle is older, will need a replacement sooner. 2. Some have mentioned Collins is a SS instead of FS, which would work just fine since the Bears need a SS too. People have made a big deal out of the Ole Miss game, but each time the flaw had less to do with ability and more to do with eye discipline. Collins was clearly peaking on the first one, and just got caught. On the second one he was switching WRs while trying to read the QB's eyes, and there was a great pass. 3. Collins would immediately come in and get tons of playing time, but a rookie WR might not see as much time behind Jeffery, Royal, and potentially Wilson. Aside from that the Bears still have the Unicorn and Forte to feed on offense, which means minimal rookie touches for a WR.

You're probably right, which is fine with me. The guy I like a lot this year is Hroniss Grasu, but he's more of a finesse player. I'd rather have a bull on the OL than a quick-footed guy. Put him next to a beast OG, then put Long at RT, and you pretty much can guarantee a first down every other play when running to the right side.

Interesting quotes considering the other notes about him being a stop-gap.

Exactly. I'm figuring this means the Bears will push for Wiz.

Meh.

Hard to say. Could be NT, since some don't believe the guys we have fit the bill. Could be OT, since neither guy did well last year. Could be S, since last year's guys sucked, and we're not sure what to expect out of the FAs. It's surely not WR, however.

It is sort of comical. There is no way in hell the Bears draft Beasley, Ray, Fowler, or Dupree in the first round.

The only return player I care about is Peanut.

I'm just not a big fan of WR in the first for this team. Much bigger needs. Still great players available at #7.

I noticed, and I didn't really like the moves in terms of personnel usage. It essentially says, "Hey, we're throwing a few of the guys we have on roster in the trash can."

Drafting a RB at all this year would be stupid unless Gordon is available in the 5th (not happening).

I guess I'm just thinking of a non traditional way to use 3-4 DEs. I don't want them to be space eaters who take up OL. I want them to attack so the O doesn't know where the next blitzer or player is coming from.

Would any of these drafts be somewhat acceptable? ALL BAMA DRAFT 1 - Amari Cooper, WR 2 - Arie Kouandjio, OG - Backfills for Long's move to OT 3 - TJ Yeldon, RB 4 - Austin Shepard, OT 5 - Xzavier Dickson, OLB 6 - Trey DePriest, ILB ALL FSU DRAFT Trade down for an extra third and X 1 - Eddie Goldman, DT 2 - PJ Williams, CB 3 - Rashad Greene, WR 3 - Mario Edwards, DE 4 - Josue Matias, OG 5 - Nick O'Leary, TE 6 - Karlos Williams, RB ALL OREGON DRAFT Trade down for an extra second and X 1 - Arik Armstead, DT 2 - Jake Fisher, OT 2 - Hroniss Grasu, C 3 - Ifo Ekpre-Olomu, CB 4 - Erick Dargan, SS ALL AUBURN DRAFT Trade down for future picks 1 - Sammie Coates, WR 2 - Reese Dismukes, C 3 - Gabe Wright, DT 4 - Cameron Artis-Payne, RB 5 - Nick Marshall, CB 6 - CJ Uzomah, TE ALL LSU DRAFT Trade down for an extra second and X 1 - La'el Collins, OT 2 - Danielle Hunter, DE 2 - Jalen Collins, CB 3 - Kwon Alexander, OLB 4 - Terrance Magee, RB 5 - Jermauria Rasco, DE ALL WASHINGTON DRAFT Trade up with whatever scenario works 1 - Danny Shelton, NT 2 - Shaq Thompson, OLB 2 - Marcus Peters, CB 3 - Hau'oli Kikaha, OLB Honestly, I'd be pretty happy with that Bama draft. I'm not a big fan of Shepard or Dickson, and I would like a DB in there somewhere, but overall that's not bad. Pick up Blake Sims after the draft for shits and grins.

I can envision a scenario where Allen or Young as 3-4 DEs would create confusion on the offense. They'd have to account for a rarely seen speed from 3-4 DEs. Will they go in or out? Will they crash the B-gap hard, or try a spin move? To be honest, gap pressure is gap pressure. It causes offenses to play defensively. Well, pressure does that. And that's what Allen/Young/etc. do. You're telling me that Allen and Young are suddenly ineffective because they move slightly to the side? That's just nonsensical to me. With an effective defensive plan, particularly one where the LB blitzes are unpredictable, that minimal strength difference is negated.

I just don't agree. A front 3 that lacks size can be utilized differently, with the same principles as a 3T DT in the 4-3. Instead of holding ground, he can be asked to attack more often. This leaves the LB, particularly the OLB, responsible for gap discipline and edge coverage. I don't see any issue, however, if the Bears trotted out a front three of Allen-Rat-McDonald then followed it up with a rotation of Houston-Ego-Sutton/Jenkins. If the front seven is moving around harmoniously, I don't think the size is as big of a deal. In fact, 3-4 defenses tend to cause more confusion because of that exact fluidity - it feels like there are more players on D than there really are. Personally, I'm kind of hoping for that to be honest. I'm hoping speed wins out in all positions other than the NT, and the defense, while light, flies all over the place making huge hits. I much prefer an attacking defense like the Eagles ran for years than a flaccid D that holds ground and lets the offense pound into it for minimal gain (i.e. the Lovie special).

I can take on SF. Also, I'll take Chicago since it was mentioned earlier and nobody has jumped on the grenade yet.

I still don't see how anyone can say the Bears are short on DE. There are several players who will potentially work there. The Bears already had Allen, Bass, Houston, Lane, Merrell, Washington, and Young. Admittedly, 3 of those names are throw-aways, but that still leaves Allen, Houston, Washington, and Young. I don't care what they say about Houston; he's playing DE with his 300lb ass. And THEN they went out and signed McDonald and Jenkins. And that's not even taking into account that Sutton is probably going to end up getting a shot there because he doesn't appear to be 1st or 2nd in line for the NT job.

That would be atrocious.

I will take TEN and SEA. Two good friends can help me out with their favorite teams.

Rat-Ego-McDonald? Rat-Ego-Mac? REM? Putting offenses to sleep! I'm sold.

Yes, it is. And yes, you're right about the others, but I didn't see a realistic situation where those guys start given the number of bodies the Bears have.

I feel the exact same way. I like that draft a lot. I know some would throw a fit about going offense-offense, but I like it. Also not a fan of McCarthy, unless we're talking Jenny, and it's the late 90s.