-
Posts
8,850 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by jason
-
1. Didnāt watch. 2. Was Caleb inaccurate again on simple passes? 3. Who all had drops? 4. Winning like this is not normally a sustainable plan. But is it just good enough? Or are the Bears getting breaks? It seems the breaks are even, if not against the Bears slightly. So, is it actually sustainable this year? Are the Bears actually better than we realize considering the injuries, officiating imbalance, and self-inflicted mistakes? 5. This feels like the Lovie era. This team will win just enough to threaten or make the playoffs, get thumped, and have a draft pick in the teens. Unless you hit a home run on that teen draft pick, itās a sure fire recipe for perpetual 10-7 or 9-8 seasons with the same ending.
-
1. I didnāt watch it. 2. Why did Caleb suck? Bad throws? Bad scheme? Drops? 3. How did Santos miss the one FG? 4. Why did the Bears go for so many FGs? Or where did the offense stall? Outwardly, this looks like a game that the a bears should have won by 2+ TDs.
-
I think a QB who can breathe, slow the game down, see the field, anticipate the play, and make the throw under duress is the QB who becomes great in the NFL. The QB who canāt do that is destined for something other than greatness. Williams is still frantic at times, inaccurate too often, and that seemed like the type of play that Brady, Rodgers, Montana, et. al would have laser-guided to the outstretched hands of OZ. When he consistently sees those open receivers and hits them, Iāll believe it fully. Right now Iām just cautiously optimistic.
-
Oz and Kmet. More so Oz.
-
Nailed it, top to bottom. The combination of no pass rush and porous secondary makes average dudes like Flacco look great. When the Bears play great QBs they have a very good chance of getting eviscerated. Thatās the scariest aspect.
-
Agree on Swift v Monangai. Swift seems pedestrian at times, and doesnāt hit the expected hole immediately, costing him yards. Monangai sees it, hits it, drives hard, and regularly picks up extra yards after contact.
-
There were definitely some Justin Fields games where he was the best player and the primary reason for the win. As for today, love the win, love the clutch gene, but watch that last scrambling TD again. Two WRs wide open. WIDE OPEN. I would have been much more impressed if Caleb had stopped and fired a game-winning TD pass. As it stands now, the end of game scrambling heroics remind me of guess who? Fields again.
-
The EPA formula is so bogus in my opinion. Some things canāt be properly quantified.
-
Caleb reminds me some talented kids on my sonsā little league team. All the talent in the world, but something is missing mentally. Throw from 3rd? Gun it as hard as possible. Good throw and itās an out. Throw from 2nd? Gun it as hard as possible. Now itās an error and the runners are circling bases.
-
GOOD BETTER BEST!! I love that rallying cry. The team really seems to have bonded. Outwardly there is a great locker room culture right now.
-
Thatās been my philosophy on here for years. Why draft a QB high if youāre not going to protect him and give him weapons? Looks like thatās finally occurring this year. I just wish they had believed in Kmet as #1 pass receiving TE and drafted someone to whelp the defense.
-
I love the win and the drama, but just because Loveland had a great play/game doesnāt mean it was a good pick. My comment was a reply to the concept that the selection is somehow proven as the right move. I still think it wasnāt, since the defense has massive holes and Kmet has been woefully underused.
-
Nah. If you have a wallet full of money in your left pocket, and then fill a new wallet with cash & put it in your right pocket, it doesnāt prove that the new wallet was a good purchase. It just proves you have two good walletsā¦and based on the score, holes in your socks.
-
Optimism as a Bears fan is not common. And it wonāt come from me. Williams looks to me like Trubisky and Fields when it comes to making reads, going through progressions, and pocket presence. The main thing is, in addition to Williams having a way more talented arm, he also has better weapons and a far superior OL.
-
Make no mistake, heās a blocking TE if thatās how the Bears use him. Unless they start really including him on offense, heās primarily a blocking TE. Can he be a receiving TE? Sure. Thatās the only reason a team would draft a TE in the first. But right now heās a blocking TE.
-
I appreciate that you own it, but a 5-win team shouldnāt be spending a first round pick on a TE, much less a blocking TE. Blocking TEs go on day 3.
-
No real pass rush and 3rd string DBs is likely to make Flacco look like Brady. Weāve seen this movie many times over, where a journeyman is initially doubted, then torches the Bears for one of his best games of the year, and the people say, āWow! Look at Player X! What a great day he had!ā Whenever I expect good things from the Bears my heart is broken. So, I expect Flacco goes for 300+, puts up better numbers than Williams, and the Bears likely lose in excruciating fashion. In reality, Williams should have a breakout day, with 3+TDs - or passes that set up a few short running TDs - and make us all think he is still the man on which this franchise should rest its shoulders.
-
Where is Everyone who loved the Loveland pick? Where is the 12 personnel? Is it even being run? When it IS being run, is it even successful? When it IS being run, whatās the percentage of time the first round TE is blocking? Horrible pick at an unnecessary position. I know itās early, but what a waste. He is underutilized, and so is the other good TE on the team.
-
Yes. No. No. Dude can make all the throws that mere mortals canāt, but canāt make the throws a garden variety NFL starter can. The things thatās crazy is, Iām still seeing guys WIDE OPEN. And many of them are wide open because of the scheme. For years Iād ask myself, āHow the hell did GB receiver (insert name) get so wide open against our D?ā Now I see it happening and the #1 overall QB reads defenses like someone who just started playing Madden.
-
What Is The Problem With This Franchise? The Same ole Same ole - Owners
jason replied to Lucky Luciano's topic in Bearstalk
BINGO! Every damn person with the Bears thinks theyāre the smartest guy in the room. They reach. They trade. They go with ātheirā BPA š And the whole time everyone else is screaming otherwise. 90% of the fans say something different. Like this year with OT, DE, and RB. So what do the Bears do? TE and WR. š¤¦š»āāļø This has happened for literal decades now. I have said this for many years in a row: True BPA is stupid. You donāt draft Marino if you have Montana. At a certain point you must draft for need. Itās 100% necessary because a team is only as strong as its weakest link. The Bears should focus on huge names for football powerhouse programs, especially with a history of pumping out studs at a specific position. Want a WR? Start with Bama or LSU players. Want OL? Maybe focus on a kid from Iowa who throws hay bails for fun. Itās really not that difficult. That strategy may not find the hidden gems, but itās got a lot better chance of avoiding catastrophe. But you do you, Poles. Cut Kmet at the end of the year and find another Shaheen.š -
Keep in mind this foul has an undefined timing mechanism to it, as well as a perception angle. One, is the QB still the āpasserā? He continues to be the passer until the pass ends or he participates, roughly. A lot of Refs have a āthe ball is goneā-saying right after the throw, whether verbal or nonverbal, that acts as a timer. After the phrase equals a foul. Two, does the defender make āanyā attempt to pull back weight? With the timing of āis he still a passer by definitionā and the perception of ādid the defender pull back,ā there is a lot of wiggle room.
-
As stated, the training tapes Iāve seen from NFL guys makes it cut and dry. head contact w/ QB in the pocket = foul Itās almost like a facemask in that regard: no gray area. Even though the arm was hit first, heās still by rule a passer. And therefore can still get the roughing call. To understand rules itās often beneficial to take them to the extreme. If contact to the throwing arm were first, and a punch to the jaw were second, we obviously wouldnāt say, āHe hit the throwing arm first!ā Same concept.
