Stinger226

There looking at anybody that can generate a pass rush and I think they will find the right one.

If your head aint staight when your in the limelight looking for a big contract, let someone else take a risk on him, there are plenty low valve LBs that were productive and be worthy of a chance. I have only seen him play in one game but AZ54 has more info than anyone on here, so I go with him. FORGET IT

I totally agree on the upgrade of the OL, but just because he wasnt a big name doesnt mean its not an upgrade. He was a high pick and actually have started a ton of games. This GM looks to do things a little differently and we wont know until training camp what everything will look like. I would say he takes C. Williams guard spot for they will move him to a OT spot,as maybe a swing tackle? I dont think he can start and upgrade the position for us.

It gives us another option, competition will hurt our below average line.

I think this doesn't bode well for Spencer. He's making 3.5 mil, e Williams can play center, we have Louis also. One of them will be gone.

I think this doesn't bode well for Spencer. He's making 3.5 mil, e Williams can play center, we have Louis also. One of them will be gone.

I think we can use good players at CB, but they won't be drafting one in the first , no matter how much u want them too.

We have a new guy drafting, so hopefully, we don't get lids anymore.

We had 3.5 left and signed the two cbs. I think we have 1.8 left, but with us signing some people, some others will be cut. So if its small contracts those will probably just be washs. He might be better than Roach, but at least is better than the backups.

I think LT is our biggest need, but we will draft a DE or DT with the first round because of the available players at those spots that should be there.

We just have to many holes to fill, to get any player in the front of the draft, will just cost to much. Your right about the upper part of the draft always for star type players.

From the stuff I have been reading, there is a chance he wont even be drafted. Lovie is a speed guy, so if we get some one late rounds, they will be able to run.

That is a good list other than Dennard wont be a 2nd round pick.

McShay is a good talker but if you look at players he rates high, he misses just as many as he hits. I would take Kirkpatrick over Gilmore, but its a mute point, we wont be picking a CB in the first round.

The New York Giants seem to draft DL every year and it has turned out well for them. If the BPA is a DT, we need to take him. I would prefer Cox but it aint my job, so this is just Bear talk.

I don't care what positions we draft as long as the first four picks turn out good players, to many weak spots .

Draft is suppose to be his. Stength, no matter how it looks from this side , it just has to be right later.

We have to many holes to fill, giving up what u would have to to get to those spots ain't worth it . To me maybe you had a shot at Kahil, or maybe coples, at 12 who be considered, but probably to expensive.

You and I are big on the OL needing to be upgraded, I just dont feel as confident in C. Williams as a good player. You have already given me a researched history of why he isnt our LT, I just think , he isnt because he just isnt much good enough. I think if the draft goes wrong and we dont get a high level OT then we have to give hm a shot, but we need options if he fails.(again)

Cox would be a good valve and need for us. I think one of the top players will drop, the question will be which one. I think with Tannerhill will be taken early so that gives us one more shot at one of our needs. Do you think we would consider Brockers if he drops as a DT that fits our scheme.

I agree, not looking good going forward, the problem is a weak draft for safeties.

I hear a lot of teams like him, but dont like his lack of production for such a stud.

You have a talented list. I dont think we consider a DB in the first round, with so many potenial good players there at a position of need. Lavonte is not a first round pick, so he shouldnt be on that list. Coples should be first, and Reiff has to be on that list. I swear I have viewed almost every mock draft put out and have never seen Lavonte drafted in the first round. I think GBND,PFW, and NFP are good at there player evaluation and they have him listed as 48,39,36 respectively. A good player thou.

I agree with you list except for Poe( a combine guy with NO production)refer to Gilbert. and Gilmore as we wont be drafting a CB in the first round with so many potential good players being there at a spot of need. I think at the end of the list will be Merculis. as our first round choice. I think Rieff at the first one is spot on. If coples and Reiff are there, a big debate in the war room. I think Jones is a late first round to mid second round pick, which we shouldnt consider in the first round. 1a Reiff 1b Coples 3 Floyd 4 Cox 5 DeCastro 6 Kuechly 7 Martin 8 Ingram 9 Glenn 10 Merculis There are a couple of DB that are worth taking at that spot but simply think, they think, they could get a cover 2 starter in the 3rd or 4th round and wont draft one at 19. I think one falls from the front of that list other wise It will be from one of the the last 3 picks. I think, they think highly of Merculis, even thou there are better rated players on the board. If Reiff, Martin, DeCastro, and also Glenn are there they greatly consider drafting them do to our need to up date the talent at OL no matter what position.

Experts dont do very well at this, but we can try and I put a team on.