#10 Pick Prediction

[jason]

Hate it

[OmahaBear]

I guess things never change. 

[adam]

Watch Kmet get traded lol.

[CrackerDog]

12 minutes ago, adam said:

Loveland at 10 to Bears. Meh.

Meh is right.  I loved watching him play at Michigan but he is NOT worthy of the #10 pick.  Disappointed 

[BearFan PHX]

I guess we know what Johnson thinks of Kmet. I see OT and HB as being our biggest holes, but if you dont believe in Kmet, then TE would be pretty important too.

[ASHKUM BEAR]

Not a huge fan at 10, but understand with Banks gone. 

Bears got WR#3/TE1. He replaces Keenan Allen.  Now trade up for Conerly or take Ersery and Henderson/Johnson  

[jason]

9 minutes ago, adam said:

Watch Kmet get traded lol.

Yep. And it’s a dumb move. Kmet was a third option at best all year. How is he supposed to succeed? Especially when other plays had Williams running for his life?

[BearFan PHX]

12 minutes ago, ASHKUM BEAR said:

Not a huge fan at 10, but understand with Banks gone. 

Bears got WR#3/TE1. He replaces Keenan Allen.  Now trade up for Conerly or take Ersery and Henderson/Johnson  

agree.

[Stinger226]

Everybody is looking at last year's offense and comment negativity. This is a different offense, a lot more snaps for everyone. Kmet will have more targets than last year . With a good offense everyone gets fed.

[BearFan PHX]

Starks goes to the Ravens - they have a history of great safeties and they just got another one.

[BearFan PHX]

And Now Tyliek Williams to the Lions. He's gonna be tough. Glad we've beefed up the OL.

[AZ54]

6 minutes ago, BearFan PHX said:

Starks goes to the Ravens - they have a history of great safeties and they just got another one.

He'd have been a great pick for us on a big trade back but Loveland is at least better value at 10.    

[BearFan PHX]

6 minutes ago, AZ54 said:

He'd have been a great pick for us on a big trade back but Loveland is at least better value at 10.    

he was one of the guys I was always taking in the 2nd round, of course he wasnt gonna last that long. Funy thing is I often had Coleston Loveleand there too. In the 2nd. Draft simulators are funny LOL

So now, the 2nd round picks are OT and D Line.

[Stinger226]

6 hours ago, AZ54 said:

He'd have been a great pick for us on a big trade back but Loveland is at least better value at 10.    

The problem with rankings and mock drafts,  the NFL teams doesn't make their big board up by what fans think. They do a years research to make picks. Johnson clearly wanted Loveland and I'm glad some smart people agreed. It makes the pick look better but in the end , it's what happens when the games are played.

[AZ54]

3 hours ago, Stinger226 said:

The problem with rankings and mock drafts,  the NFL teams doesn't make their big board up by what fans think. They do a years research to make picks. Johnson clearly wanted Loveland and I'm glad some smart people agreed. It makes the pick look better but in the end , it's what happens when the games are played.

The problem is Ryan Poles has not put a winning product on the football field.    Technically neither have I.  Until he changes that there is no data to prove he’s any better than the virtual fantasy  GMs here on this board.  

[jason]

2 hours ago, AZ54 said:

The problem is Ryan Poles has not put a winning product on the football field.    Technically neither have I.  Until he changes that there is no data to prove he’s any better than the virtual fantasy  GMs here on this board.  

100% concur. So many Bears fans have been saying “trust the process” or “trust the experts,” or mocking everyone else as armchair GMs for literal decades, all while the actual Bears GMs have continually shit the bed.

We can never know what would have happened if we made the picks, if the players would have coalesced into a winning team, or if certain combinations would have produced results. But what we DO know is that the Bears’ GMs have unequivocally failed for all but a handful of years since the mid-80s.