Jump to content

RD7. Pick233. Kyle Monangai


jason

Recommended Posts

  • jason changed the title to RD7. Pick233. Kyle Monangai
  • adam pinned this topic

Most people looked at Swift as a nobody. The coaches disagreed. They weren't looking for a load type back, they wanted a Montgomery type of back. 

No fumbles, great pass blocker, hard runner, a short yardage guy. He was all big ten 2 yrs in a row. Let's see him on the field before I bad mouth this pick. He's a violent runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DABEARSDABOMB said:

Bad oline play / good pad level. Let’s see what he can do with what is hopefully a better oline. 

I like surprises,he could be the daring of the draft. All big 10 2 yrs in a row does not scream failure. He fits what we need, physical running in short yardage situations. Pass blocks well and NO fumbles in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's competition for Roschon for sure.  I'm not that enamored with Roschon.  I think Roschon has better receiving skills but he's not "good" in that category and while it's reportedly not seen on film it's possible Monangai showed similar skills in his workouts.  He sure seems to be better at pass pro than Roschon.  

It's impossible to know what the team was looking for in a RB or rather who they wanted / where.  Poles said they let the board fall to them and it sure looks that way from the outside.  I also wonder if the team still has some hopes for Wheeler as a contributor.  Which is my way of saying that     A)    they didn't view RB as an urgent need and    b)    once their top RBs were off the board they weren't going to worry about it at all.  

It was interesting to hear the new HC say he was impressed that the draft team worked the board so well and didn't fall prey to filling a need.  Does Ben Johnson truly have a long term view on the roster?  It's hard to say because the offense got a lot of focus early in this draft.  We'll see what that looks like on the field.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AZ54 said:

I think he's competition for Roschon for sure.  I'm not that enamored with Roschon.  I think Roschon has better receiving skills but he's not "good" in that category and while it's reportedly not seen on film it's possible Monangai showed similar skills in his workouts.  He sure seems to be better at pass pro than Roschon.  

It's impossible to know what the team was looking for in a RB or rather who they wanted / where.  Poles said they let the board fall to them and it sure looks that way from the outside.  I also wonder if the team still has some hopes for Wheeler as a contributor.  Which is my way of saying that     A)    they didn't view RB as an urgent need and    b)    once their top RBs were off the board they weren't going to worry about it at all.  

It was interesting to hear the new HC say he was impressed that the draft team worked the board so well and didn't fall prey to filling a need.  Does Ben Johnson truly have a long term view on the roster?  It's hard to say because the offense got a lot of focus early in this draft.  We'll see what that looks like on the field.    

To me, they wanted Henderson, he got picked and traded back. Skattebo got picked right before our pick, traded back. Brashard Smith got picked, backup plan was Monongai.  They waited to the end and still got someone that can play duel RB role. They guess where a player is picked and design their board according but always had a backup plan. Clearly they had targeted some players, on their board. I would say questions on LB and CB but everyone else makes the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • adam unpinned this topic

I saw an interesting comp (there are many). Both Big Ten RBs, both drafted by the Bears, both will be used in a Ben Johnson offense. One was a 7th rounder, and one was a 3rd rounder. Guess the players:

RB A - last 2 seasons: 498-2541, 5.1 YPC, 21 TD
RB B - last 2 seasons: 515-2362, 4.6 YPC, 24 TD 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, adam said:

I saw an interesting comp (there are many). Both Big Ten RBs, both drafted by the Bears, both will be used in a Ben Johnson offense. One was a 7th rounder, and one was a 3rd rounder. Guess the players:

RB A - last 2 seasons: 498-2541, 5.1 YPC, 21 TD
RB B - last 2 seasons: 515-2362, 4.6 YPC, 24 TD 

I’ll guess on was A train albeit I thought he was a second rounder? Or is one the MSU back Langford (thought he was more a 4th rounder)? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DABEARSDABOMB said:

I’ll guess on was A train albeit I thought he was a second rounder? Or is one the MSU back Langford (thought he was more a 4th rounder)? 

I totally jacked that up, cutting and pasting. That's what I get for reading crap at 5am lol. One was Big Ten, one was Big 12. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DABEARSDABOMB said:

So it is Monty - I’m going to say Monty is player B. 

Correct, and both had 13x 100 yard rushing games in their last two seasons. Production-wise, those numbers are really close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, adam said:

Correct, and both had 13x 100 yard rushing games in their last two seasons. Production-wise, those numbers are really close. 

Also, while Monangai is smaller than Montgomery (5’8 211 v. 5’10” 222), their 40 times and 10 yard splits are virtually identical (Monangai is 4.6/1.54 and Montgomery was 4.6/1.55). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dawhizz said:

Also, while Monangai is smaller than Montgomery (5’8 211 v. 5’10” 222), their 40 times and 10 yard splits are virtually identical (Monangai is 4.6/1.54 and Montgomery was 4.6/1.55). 

Rule one of football:  low man wins!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...